this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
124 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8039 readers
1226 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

Social media is fine, we just need to remove the profit incentive from it.

[–] zehnkirchen@feddit.org 8 points 5 hours ago

Love it. Social media is bullshit. It is not "social" at all....a proper german translation would be "gesellschaftsmedien" and that tells you it is worth shit. what should we do with the ppl ill with stockholm syndrome that are caught up the in smut of US corpos?

saw tantrums of teenagers for not being able to procrasinate and get childish dopamin kicks. as children can not control their temper this was absolutely necessary and I think we should ban corporate social media all over europe.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah why educating kids on the dangers of social media when you can restrict them ...

[–] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I can educate my children all I want – if their peers are on Social Media nonstop, they will be too.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip -5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get the point. Because their friends are on social media that absolves you from educating your kids?

bad reading comprehension

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 45 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

β€œWe can’t forcefully scan your chats directly yet, so we’ll force you to hand over your ID.” Seems like it’s happening all at once, all over the globe the past year or so.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It is supposed to be anonymous with our MitID system, which is already in place for almost everything. How it works (on paper at least) is that the social media site would send a question to MitID, like "is this person at least 16?" And MitID just responds with yes/no

So again, in theory, no social media site should be getting your ID here. Only the government, which absolutely has it and is in fairly high trust from the people in Denmark.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The rub there is that the government probably now has a record of every site you have an account on.

What we really need is a system that's anonymized in both directions. Where the website can verify the specific claim, age, nationality, etc, but the issuer of the verification, aka the government, can't track where that verification has been used.

I think this should be possible, but it's different from the way standard identity providers operate, and I haven't heard of any of these government identity providers operating that way. That may be because it's easier, and it may be because governments like the idea of knowing everything we do.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 48 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Restricting social media for old people would prevent more harm.

[–] lysol@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, but there are legit issues with social media for kids as well, especially with trash like tiktok.

Restricting how the algorithms of social media platforms work instead of restricting the age would be much better though, but that would mean rich people earning less money. And we can't have that right?

[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Restricting how the algorithms of social media platforms work instead of restricting the age would be much better though

Problem is also bullying among peers. As I read somewhere, bullying in the school is (mostly) just in the school. Bullying online is everywhere at all hours of the day when you have a phone.

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

That's kind of where it all started

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-12/emma-mason-reflects-on-tilly-legacy-social-media-ban-australia/106116832

Fifteen-year-old Matilda "Tilly" Rosewarne was relentlessly bullied by her peers on social media, and on February 16, 2022, Tilly took her own life.

[–] zehnkirchen@feddit.org -1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

...because...?

the young ppl will receive more brainwashing overall? the kids have no experience to measure the info with? the teens make zero use of verification depth?

na, i am sure social media causes a much bigger harm to kids as you also can see from who is getting treatment. but the hate filled steep thesis without any arguments tells me how tarded you are.

[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

…because…?

I'm guessing the commentator is thinking about the Karens and Trumps out there, that uses these media to attack others, but often with a bigger reach and things that have much bigger implications.

[–] zehnkirchen@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

nice idea but no. you think a karen is making the decision that a certain amount of ppl hears her hatespeech? nope. it is not. it is american CEOs. none else. if you want a better place AND have social media, remove the boards and stockholders of the s&p500 from earth and there you go.

[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"tarded"? Exemplary childish personal attack there.

I think what they were referring to was the people doing the brainwashing, and general indiscriminate use of online services where they disregard consequences outside of their bubble.

It's a hard thing to measure, of course. But I think long-term the effort is better focused on the young indeed, and not the old farts at the end of their life.

[–] zehnkirchen@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s a hard thing to measure, of course.

It is not. many univerrsities did the job and came to a conclusion. you didnt. yet you have a strong useless opinion. congrats!

Damage is done and we won't see the big picture of WWIII. We weren't using some toy, we were ammunition in a new kind of weapon.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today -4 points 8 hours ago

probably to stem the anti-zionist rhetoric, and to prevent criticism against right wing groups.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It's backfiring in Australia, so why would it work over there?

[–] zehnkirchen@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

LOL. how old are you?

[–] cliffracer_cloaka@piefed.social 17 points 10 hours ago

I love the sources you provided!!

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 16 points 10 hours ago

What do you mean by backfiring?
The only thing I've read about were some influencers loosing some amount of their followers and engagement, and thus possibly money.