this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
29 points (89.2% liked)

The Deprogram Podcast

1650 readers
16 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).

Resources:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you were in a situation where it was plausible to convert an average working class fascist to a leftist through establishing common ground, what could you think of?

All I could think of was:

  • We agree the mainstream media lies
  • We agree the status quo is failing
  • We agree we deserve better pay
  • We agree the system does not really care about us

Anyway, did you know evil Russian dictator Joseph 'just a spoonful' Stalin killed 67 × 10⁴²⁰ people with slave labour gulags which makes him just as bad as that Hitler guy? Vote Kamala Harris!

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly i think some right wingers may be easier to "convert" than many liberals. It all depends on how deeply entrenched their views are and how big a role racism plays in them. Because as you pointed out, there are already points of agreement which are not shared with liberals about the unreliability of mainstream media, the recognition that the system is not working, and so on which can be built upon.

The main obstacle is to get them to recognize that bigotry and racism are a false consciousness, that these are deliberate distractions by the ruling class meant to divide and impede the formation of actual class consciousness through the use of scapegoats and prejudice. This also goes hand in hand with rejecting notions that some people are inherently more deserving than others, which is an idea used to justify the exploitative hierarchies created by capitalism.

In general i would say it's not so much whether someone is a liberal or a conservative that determines how easy it is "convert" them, it's how invested they are into their current ideology. The more they think that they "know" about the world and the more their worldview is "calcified", so to speak, the harder of a time you will have in convincing them to be intellectually open and willing to rethink their beliefs.

[–] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah liberals don't really want change, or at least a significant transformation, they want capitalism with a smile on it's face, exploitation with kindness. And their ego tells them they have politics figured out, thus making them uninterested in other options such as M-Lism of course - generally anyway, people are nuanced after all.

I disagree with you somewhat on your first paragraph (totally agree on the other two though) because I think right wingers are often very closed-minded, they often aren't willing to actually listen to your arguments, often just looking for a way to create a cool sounding argument that claims to prove some contradiction in your views but the response usually relies on twisting your words and views to hit you with some false 'gotcha'.

Thank you for such a well-worded response.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I disagree with you somewhat on your first paragraph (totally agree on the other two though) because I think right wingers are often very closed-minded

Many of them definitely are. That's why i said "some". As i said it depends how invested they are in right wing ideology. Most people are mostly apolitical.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

A core conviction of fascists is, that someone else should have to suffer for their situation to get better. And they consciously choose the objectively evil, though easy way to make that happen: inflict the suffering on vulnerable people. This is easier then targeting powerful people and actually works shorterm, so no point arguing against it. German fascists for example benefitted immensely from forced labor and stealing belongings of their victims.

You can only try to convince them about mid and long-term effects (contradictions in capitalism aren't solved, crisis will happen, fascism constantly needs new victims and becomes a death cult which ultimately destroys itself every time).

But it's not just about rational arguments. To overcome their racism and bigotry, they need to reconnect with their ability to feel empathy for people they see as "others". The problem is, that they deliberately and selectively killed it off and that's not easy to reverse.

Without empathy, they could eventually agree with your arguments, but still just not care that much. Like: "Okay, maybe Israel is doing genocide in Gaza, sounds kind of bad, but... eh, whatever." That's literally the collective reaction of western civilization.

One thing, that's sure to ignite empathy and to slowly erode racism is personal friendship with someone from the group they hate. But it's dangerous, takes forever and it's probably impossible for most people.

Any other idea how to do it? Actual praxis in common struggle somehow? If it's former friends or family, there might be emotional common ground to build on.

As a mass tactic, maybe a campaign that centers solidarity and empathy in propaganda. And maybe mixed with measured violence, because some people need to feel their victims fight back to realize that they're human too.

[–] haui@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Depends on what you see as fascists. The leftlib fascist (working class person who was disillusioned into a right or alt right stance) or the core ideologists who just want black and brown people to die?

I cant help with the latter but the former we get with "socialism with national characteristics" it is my new theory, after reading 90% of fanon (and going) it was that which capitalism prevented by inventing german national socialism.

Of course, hitlers NS being not socialist at all and hyperreactionary, murderous race science, the non-extreme-right-deviationist would have been something like germanic socialism which puts back the national and cultural consciousnes of the former german tribes and evolved german people and inspires pride which was taken through imperialist overwriting of culture.

Those are just rough outlines but I believe that the liberalist ideology is rooted in some lesser form of colonialism, making the imperialist vassal germany still a lesser colony with military bases and involuntary coups but none of the outright dehumanization of the people like in african countries.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

We both hate the elite pedophile cabal, it's just that we hate the real one while they hate the fake psyop one.