this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4673 readers
230 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unfortunately not a great article, it's just sourced from AAP, the ABC at the moment is too busy doing live coverage of an American shooting for some reason


From Bloomberg:

Australia will ban supermarket price gouging from July 1 under a new law the government says would protect shoppers from excessive grocery prices charged by major retailers.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Minister for Competition Andrew Leigh said the changes would make it illegal for “very large” grocery chains to charge prices deemed “excessive” relative to their cost of supply plus a reasonable margin.

Penalties would be steep: as much as A$10 million ($6.7 million) per violation, or three times the value of any benefit gained, or 10% of annual turnover if that figure can’t be determined.


I don't know what "excessive" means and what the rate would be.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Excessive really does need to be quantified or else terms like price gouging are still undefined and it's more of a vibe.

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also who gets to determine what "excessive" means, and whether they've already been bought by lobbyists.

[–] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I assume the ACCC but nothing is really spelled out in this article. Whether that is the article's fault or the loose way the regulations seem to be written I do not know.

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

These days it's probably both 😉