When I read this crap, all I can think is that yeah backlash is growing because the forced implementation is growing. Another useless sentiment-based article.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
428 points (96.9% liked)
Technology
77769 readers
5566 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lets use LLMs for things LLMs are useful for. It is not a panacea, and it is not appropriate for every use case
Yeah, LLMs are interesting tech products to play with and find some niche uses for.
But for the love of god they are not "prop up the entire stock market and numerous multi-trillion-dollar companies indefinitely" good!
What is it useful for? I actually have a hard time finding a use for it... Its alright at book recommendations, sometimes.
I found it's useful for code where I know like 70% of what I'm doing. More than that and I can just do it myself. Less than that and I can't trust and diagnose the output.
I'd rather have old fashioned stack overflow and tutorials, honestly. It's hard to actually learn when it just gives answers.
I use it for coding advice sometimes, as an amateur hobbyist it's really useful to point me in the right direction when facing problems I'm unfamiliar with. I often end up reinventing the proverbial wheel, just worse, but LLMs can help point out standards and best practices that I, as an outsider to the industry, am unaware of.
You have to be careful at low skill/knowledge levels, because it'll happily send you down a crazy path that looks legitimate.
I asked it how to do something in oracle SQL, because I don't know oracle specifically, and it gave me a terrible answer. I suspected it wasn't right so I asked a coworker who's an old hand at Oracle, and he was like "no that's terrible. Here's a much simpler way"
I find it's good at writing boilerplate and scaffolding code, the stuff I really hate doing.
github copilot is fantastic for exactly this reason… completes a few lines, auto corrects, automatic find and replace, automatically fills a 3 line function body that would otherwise be an extra dependency
Movie recommendations is my biggest thing, personally.
And lots of other purposes. Just because a ton of people are misusing this tool and treating it like GAI doesn't mean that it isn't a useful tool. Even something as simple as proofreading a letter has massive utility for some people.
Definitely proof reading. Especially for people who can barely write intelligibly. They can check themselves if the meaning is still correct and they will learn grammar from the process.
I just got the notification today when opening Office programs that copilot was there
all the help threads about how to turn it off have out of date info. seems like you can no longer disable it in Excel/Word/PowerPoint
You can disable it with the uninstall function.
Microsoft Works 2000 still works fine.
This comment is fantastically chaotic and I love it so much.
RIP Microsoft Works, what a legend.
The disabling process is kinda convoluted.
- Delete word
- Install libre office
- ???
- Profit!
This is one reason I'm so glad we devs can install linux at work. I have LibreOffice installed sure, but if I need to use the Microsoft Office suite for some reason, it all works great as webpages in librewolf!
load more comments
(2 replies)
The crazy thing is, none of these articles seem to want to admit that AI is bad. They keep making articles like this. Keep saying that approval is falling among the general populace. But when touching on why that is, there's always some wiggle words. Always some spin.
It's never "people being forced to use it are seeing it as a detriment to them" people using it are seeing a decrease in efficacy of the results it gives for the amount of prompting required. Or people don't like it because it's going to have significant detrimental affects on the environment and their utilities.
All of those are solid reasons for the decline in both the use of AI LLM'S and the approval of them.
The cost of goods and services relating even tangentially to AI are going through the roof. The amount of slop is increasing at a furious pace, directly contributing to things like enshittification and dead Internet theory. The effect on the economy is looking to be extremely catastrophic.
But oh no. It's lack of authenticity on social media spaces that people are worried about. Sure.
The crazy thing is, none of these articles seem to want to admit that AI is bad.
As the old quote goes- "A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, "You are mad, you are not like us.""
In such an environment, nobody wants to admit they are not mad, lest they be attacked.
Or as someone else said- I want a future where machines cook and clean and do menial work, so us humans can focus on art and poetry and writing. Instead we have a world where machines create art and poetry and books, so the humans can focus on cleaning and menial work. I don't like this timeline.
Also, "AI could be used to to replace my job. Not that it'd do a good job at it, but it'd be a great excuse to lay me off."
Yeah. I often forget this one because AI isn't replacing my job any time soon. At best maybe it could potentially be used to streamline some processes to do with tech data and work flow management (what tests and protocols get done when, and combining tests/troubleshooting steps to prevent rework). But that would have to be a very targeted and very very regulated and tested thing before it could be viable.
It's almost like it needs a dedicated person to hold its hand as it does your job. I wonder who would be well suited for that task.
Another AI?
The orgs publishing this junk are pushing the writers to use AI. So the writers and editors can't shit talk AI because their boss will get upset.
AI is the Donald tRump of business!
It likely doesn't help that the kids use "AI" as slang for "bullshit".
I have so much admiration for the younger generation for this. Language is powerful and they know it.
Tim Walz knew it, too, with weird. Then the DNC told them to stop saying it to try and court Republicans. I'm so over winning, thanks DNC!
It’s good to see the sentiment growing. Anecdotally, there are non-technical people in my circle that use LLMs frequently as search engine replacements or to do stupid shit like generate pictures and emojis. I hope that begins to decline with the general sentiment called out in this article.
The sheer number of useless LLM integrations in every website, every mobile app, and hell, even smart TVs is insane. I feel like it’s causing people very real feature fatigue. And all of the Internet content and advertising slop is making the takeover seem so much worse.
Edit: Grammar, formatting
I react with either neutral apathy, disgust or surprise when somebody tries to show me their latest AI generated blob. Repeat twice and they stop using it. Our fear of social embarassment is higher than our desire to use AI.
"Look at this picture of me in a Ghibli style I generated"
"Oh... It's kinda bad isn't it? I'd avoid sharing it"
"Oh remember what we were debating earlier? Gemini said that..."
"Oh I know what you're going to say, it said something totally dumb, right? I know, one must be very stupid to trust it haha so anyway what were you saying?"
load more comments
(17 replies)
Three years ago, as OpenAI's ChatGPT was making its splashy debut, a Pew Research center survey found that nearly one in five Americans saw AI as a benefit rather than a threat. But by 2025, 43 percent of U.S. adults now believe AI is more likely to harm them than help them in the future, according to Pew.
1 in 5 people seeing something as positive is not a high approval rating in the beginning.
I mean 4 out of 5 Americans probably held the opinion:
load more comments
(5 replies)
Slop is terrible obviously, but at least in exchange for the slop we get… higher energy costs and acceleration of climate change
What began in 2022 as broad optimism about the power of generative AI to make peoples' lives easier has instead shifted toward a sense of deep cynicism that the technology being heralded as a game changer is, in fact, only changing the game for the richest technologists in Silicon Valley who are benefiting from what appears to be an almost endless supply of money to build their various AI projects — many of which don't appear to solve any actual problems.
many of which don’t appear to solve any actual problems.
That's putting it lightly. If only the issue was merely not having sufficient use cases, rather than actively making lives worse through environmental strains, supply chain hoarding, and misinformation.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›