this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
49 points (98.0% liked)

World News

51516 readers
1540 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China is likely to have loaded more than 100 intercontinental ballistic missiles across three silo fields and has no desire for arms control talks, according to a draft Pentagon report which highlighted Beijing's growing military ambitions.

China is expanding and modernizing its weapons stockpile faster than any other nuclear-armed power. Beijing has described reports of a military buildup as efforts to "smear and defame China and deliberately mislead the international community."

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

good. i hope they bully the us into behaving like a first world nation

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The article notes China has a strict self-defence only, no first launch policy.

Their entire arsenal is mobile in order to facilitate that kind of strategy.

The US, which makes no such promises, keeps missiles in dedicated launch facilities ready to go year round, is also expanding and updating its arsenal of nuclear weapons.

Which seems more alarming?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

The US? Im not sure if im entirely missing the point youre making here

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The US and Russian nuclear postures are far more alarming.

China still has a "relatively small" nuclear arsenal (approximately 600 warheads, of which 24 used to be deployed in missiles - apparently it's 100 now). That is not enough for a counter-force strike (disarming strike) at either the US or Russia, just enough to credibly threaten with unbearably big casualties. It should be noted that the arsenal has been growing, and will likely keep on growing. :(

The US has 3700 warheads with 1770 deployed in weapons. About 17 times more. Enough to immediately wage a civilization-ending war.

And then there's Russia. Nobody knows if their weapons work, they no longer cooperate with weapons control, but they have approximately 4300 warheads and last time when things were counted, had 1718 deployed in weapons. Enough to immediately wage a civilization-ending war.

While I would prefer China to keep its warheads off weapons, I cannot currently point a blaming finger as others aren't doing that either. :(

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think the article is about China creating dedicated launch facilities.