this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
58 points (96.8% liked)

World News

51798 readers
2494 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/44989415

China has made condoms and other contraceptives more expensive as it tries to boost birth rates ... Consumers must now pay a 13 percent value-added tax for contraception including condoms, after Beijing removed exemptions on the products from January 1.

...

The government has sought to boost China's flagging birth rate, concerned about the rapidly ageing and shrinking population, as well as record low marriage rates.

But young people in Beijing told AFP that taxing contraceptives will not address the root issues they say are stopping people from having children.

...

"The immense pressure on young people in China today — from employment to daily life — has absolutely nothing to do with condoms," a resident in her thirties, who wanted to be known only as Jessica, told AFP.

Jessica said there was a notable class divide in Chinese society and many people felt their future was too uncertain to start a family.

"The rich are too rich, and the poor remain poor... (and people) lack confidence in their future, so they may be unwilling to have children."

Xu Wanting, 33, who read about the new tax online, said she did not believe it would directly increase birth rates.

...

China's leaders, including President Xi Jinping, have pledged to address the country's demographic problems ... But the contraceptives tax is trivial compared to the true cost of raising a child in China, one of the world's most expensive countries for child-rearing, said Alfred Wu, associate professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.

...

They face concrete obstacles in China, Wu added, such as a weak job market, "prohibitive" housing costs, a stressful work culture and workplace discrimination against women.

A 19-year-old student surnamed Du told AFP in Beijing she felt the impact of more expensive contraceptives would be limited.

...

"Young people today... worry about whether they can shoulder the responsibilities of being parents," she said.

Web archive link

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“The rich are too rich, and the poor remain poor… (and people) lack confidence in their future, so they may be unwilling to have children.”

Sounds like it's the same problem everywhere.

So question: will people accept the growing divide between rich and poor or will there be revolutions at some point ?

What would it take to make people rebel anyway ? I guess when there is nothing left to lose e.g. already starving to death ?

[–] prac@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sacrificing an entire generation’s well-being just to keep the tax engine running is a wild strategy.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Wait what are they doing now? Besides the end of the VAT exemption for condoms, which is like 13% and applies to other goods by default.

[–] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 days ago

Will the Chinese do as China says? Yes.

[–] pfr@piefed.social 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Vasectomies are relatively cheap and very effective

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Vasectomies are relatively cheap

Cheap compared to raising a child, but I wouldn't call the almost 800€ I paid for mine "cheap". That's almost a years worth of groceries for me

[–] pfr@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Damn, that's expensive. Did you get a general anaesthetic? I got mine done in the chair under local anaesthetic only. Was roughly $500 AUD which I'm guessing would be just under €300 roughly

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

That’s less than a month worth of groceries for my family.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Anal, gods contraception

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The state can only wield sex as a weapon.

Free sexuality is an act of rebellion.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s insane, how does this increase population

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Seems like no matter what country you're talking about the rich would rather do anything but address the underlying problem as that would mean a less extreme wealth gap.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Exactly—taxing condoms won’t pay for a house or a kid’s education. It’s just another way to avoid fixing the massive wealth gap that’s actually stopping people from starting families.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The least unequal societies all have low birth rates though. While inequality is still a serious issue in these societies, I'm not aware of any evidence or mechanism suggesting addressing this would increase birth rates.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A more equal society than the most equal to have ever existed (in modern times at least - some hunter-gatherer tribes are highly egalitarian)? No, I don't think so, but the kind of issues Americans popularly hypothesize as reasons for low birth rates are just not relevant in these societies, and I don't see lower inequality having much effect on the real reasons people have no or few children there.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

My unsourced and anecdotal explanation would be that inequality is one part of it with the other major part being global instability. I have zero desire to have children and the reasons are split just about 50/50 between affordability and the expectation that my theoretical child and/or I will die in a war or climate-related disaster. This has only been more reinforced with the US being the US and already throwing its bloated, rotting and explosives-filled carcass of a state onto other countries

[–] pfr@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Be careful with that rational logic... Oh wait, this isn't Reddit. Carry on.

[–] despite_velasquez@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

On it's own, probably not, paired with decreasing access and quality of sex ed, probably quite a lot

[–] prac@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So the plan is just ‘hope they don’t know any better’? That’s even more depressing than the tax. It still doesn’t fix the fact that nobody can afford a house or daycare.

[–] despite_velasquez@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pretty much, this is the same strategy the US employs: destroy sex ed, limit contraception, criminalise abortion. It "worked" for Romania during the communist era, where the fertility rate was almost 4, but it created a huge generation of abandoned and traumatised kids.

In the state's mind, this was still a net benefit, as even traumatised and abandoned kids eventually have to work and pay taxes

[–] prac@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sacrificing an entire generation’s well-being just to keep the tax engine running is a wild strategy.

[–] despite_velasquez@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it blows my mind Romanian politicians arguing for this when the collective memory of about 300,000 women dying trying to perform unsafe at home abortions is fresh within this generation of people over 40.