this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
65 points (69.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45225 readers
801 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For awhile it was single downvotes, but it seems that moved up to 2-3 on each comment. Even the most benign stuff gets hit, the pattern is clear.

Can I find this person and block them from seeing my posts? Never really delved into how lemmy works.

Probably doesn't matter much because after awhile the forget and leave me alone for a bit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 hours ago

With all the cranks on here, downvotes are a sign of doing something right. Some instances hide downvotes entirely. Others offer settings to not show them.

Not sure blocking them affects the downvote count shown to you.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 19 hours ago

You can discover who is doing it with Lemvotes

But no, you can't block them. Here in the real world (as opposed to the dystopian centralized platforms that have largely supplanted public discourse), it is not possible to isolate a specific individual and deny them access to information provided freely to the rest of the general public.

Should their public engagement rise to the level of harassment, there are legal options you can take to compel their restraint. But downvoting everything you do does not rise to such a level.

[–] Cromer4ever@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

A few negative votes don't affect you in real life, do they?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago

To prove you wrong I down voted this post and I don't remember any interactions with you in the past.

[–] pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to say - get over it.

This is not Reddit, where downvoting would actually prevent you from posting.

This is the Fediverse, where, you can keep going. Who gives a fuck?

The whinier you are about being downvoted, the more I think you deserve it. Just like anyone who I've come across who has amassed a lot of upvotes, turned out to be the biggest assholes I've come across.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The whinier you are about being downvoted, the more I think you deserve it.

I would argue that his massive history and modlogs of him being a shitty person with inflammatory comments and toxic takes are why he deserves it. It should be obvious that after two years of mod corrective actions for egregious behavior he's not going to change.

Him doing the "oh, woe is me" act here feels pretty hollow.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

How could OP not have seen this coming?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Yes clearly these downvotes are his personal bot brigade and not people just reacting to him being a dick

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

Downvotes aren't that big of a deal my friend.

[–] CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I fed a couple of your comments into lemvotes and found out who it was pretty easily. I imagine this is a bannable offense somewhere?

https://lemvotes.org/comment/lemmy.world/comment/21432178
https://lemvotes.org/comment/lemmy.world/comment/21432359

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Looks like a normal short term lemmy fight, someone didn't like what they said in a thread and opened their history and downvoted everything on the first screen. Going back 3 days and the downvotes stop.

lemmy.world appears to be their main account, this seems to be the post that triggered them do do their downvoting spree: https://lemmy.world/post/41260627

Looks like the sock puppet master was angry for about 20 minutes, and got tired of manually downvoting. Still pretty terrible vote manipulation making lemmy a hostile place.

@shalafi@lemmy.world

[–] Username@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 day ago

I think on the original offending post, OP made some somewhat inflammatory comments about ADHD and Autism further down. I imagine the downvoter felt personally hurt by these comments, hence the temporary spree, driven mostly by emotion. I don’t agree with the vote manipulation but not knowing their full story I would caution against people coming across this and retaliating against this person. It seems like it was just a short response and hopefully they have had a chance to cool off now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neat! Don't think I have the energy to do much about it, but that's a great site, thank you very much!

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Lemvotes is a pathway to many discoveries some consider to be depressing.

[–] Unrefined@anarchist.nexus 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surprised the offender has a db0 account...

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

For anyone else wondering:

Divisions by zero lemmy.dbzer0.com

Be Weird, Download a Car, Generate Art, Screw Copyrights, Do Maths

Communities about Anarchism, Generative Al, Copylefts, Neurodivergence, Filesharing, and Free Software. (And Math!) Follow the Anarchist Code of Conduct and honor the Disengage Rule. Don't be shitty to each other. Keep it SFW. Obey the spirit of The Golden Rules. Fuck around and find out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 7 points 23 hours ago

I highly recommend going into settings and hiding downvotes from yourself. Stick to dealing with the people who at least bother to engage in written form.

Downvoting is lazy and adds zero value. It's pure masochism to let yourself get even a tiny bit annoyed just because some rando on the other side of the world spent 0.5 seconds clicking a down arrow on your comment - which they probably didn't even read to the end.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No matter what you post, someone will downvote it. It simply just doesn't matter

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago

Blocking a user only stops you from seeing them, not the other way around. They can still interact with your posts.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (6 children)

Is it because of that time you were defending pedophilia and regurgitating MAP talking points?

EDIT: or maybe it's the constant repulsive content that has resulted in pages, and pages, and pages of mod actions for years? For things such as: racism, transphobia, actual antisemitism, advocating violence, racism again, and look...

pedophile apologia again...

Man... I wonder why people would downvote you..... it's a a real headscratcher.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 12 points 20 hours ago

I'm not seeing that, pedophilia is a condition and the user was responding in earnest to a comment asking "why?". I personally would not conflate this with defending child molesters

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 14 points 23 hours ago

Nothing about that comments comes across as defending it. Also, pedophilia is not synonymous with sexual abuse.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So, your argument is that

explanation = approval

? That pathetically superficial take pretty much amounts to media illiteracy[^media-illiteracy]: see fallacy Confusing an Explanation with an Excuse.

Can anyone factually explain atrocities in your presence without you treating any explanation as a defense even when it's explicitly stated that the explained subject is immoral?

They answered the question & your not liking the answer doesn’t make it less true. There are better ways to deal with facts than insufferable irrationality.

[^media-illiteracy]: > @JUNlPER
> this is always one that gets me. so many people are unable to realize that you can present characters doing something bad without endorsing it. not sure when this kind of baby brained thing started but its so silly to see so often > >> @ducktales2020
>> more than anything they conflate Presenting Something with Agreeing With Something, but don’t apply it to good guy/bad guy narratives. when everyone’s bad they short circuit

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

are you lost?

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I mean it's a shitty take and really doesn't evidence good understanding of the topic (I used to work forensic psych and have met a LOT of pedophiles) but as far as shitty internet takes go it's meh at most and wild to me that you went to the effort to dig that out from two weeks ago for this discussion.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

There were a few pedo defenders in that thread (see the other user that got fully banned for doubling down over and over again). I tagged the profiles making excuses for pedos which is why I knew who OP was (roughly).

Just kinda feel like people who try to equate pedophiles as part of the queer community are probably shitty people. And probably have shitty takes.... and looks like they have a lot of shitty takes. So much that theyre whining about getting downvoted.

I mean, Jesus, just look at their modlog... banned for pedo apologia, actual antisemitism, civility, etc etc etc. Pages of mod actions....

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So you're saying falseWhite and krimsom are a stalker!
Very sad and pathetic.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

FalseWhite is a serial vote manipulator, so... Yeah. Dude's not even trying to hide; all the accounts they use to vote multiple times on posts use the same exact name.

Though, OP is also a pedophile/defender of pedophiles, so I mean... They're gonna get downvoted by anyone who knows who they are just for that. 🤷‍♂️

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah..uh...nice modlog, OP...

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

falseWhite mass downvotes from accounts on at least three instances that I've seen. There are several others that I've noticed, but it hasn't bothered me enough to look into it beyond that. I figure eventually these accounts will get banned for something or other, and it isn't worth that much time or space in my head.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

careful or jordanlund will silence you for brigading.

1000002764

load more comments
view more: next ›