The article and title have been updated.
Council votes again to dump public EV fast charging station β then changes its mind
I think it's saying that they'll go ahead with the chargers now. In having trouble parsing the edits to be honest
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
The article and title have been updated.
Council votes again to dump public EV fast charging station β then changes its mind
I think it's saying that they'll go ahead with the chargers now. In having trouble parsing the edits to be honest
All I could see was this
This article has been updated to correct an error that the Livingstone shire council refused to rescind the decision to pause all EV charger installations on the Capricorn coast.
Yeah, it's really confusingly worded
Last week the Livingstone Shire council voted to cancel a deal to install the Capricorn Coastβs first EV charger, and a followup meeting held on Thursday to reverse the decision initially failed to win over the required number of four councillors.
But a surprise second motion from the mayor reversing last weekβs decision while also asking state and national local government associations to investigate renewables, got up.
So my read of it is:
But I'm not that confident in my comprehension of it
I move a motion to rename Capricorn Coast to Cooker Coast.
What a stupid own goal. smh
mayor Adam Belot was basing his about-face on the heavily-debunked Channel 7 News report on nickel manufacturing in Indonesia
He may not have shares in oil or even received much of a bribe. Just rabidly ideologically driven.
I don't understand the useful-idiots who don't even want renewables to succeed. I understand questioning of viability (we need to guard against green-washing) but they get angry whenever there is news of progress with renewables.
But he probably does have shares in oil or received a bribe tho. Better to seem like an idiot than corrupt.
Am always surprised by how little it costs to bribe Australian politicians.