this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
148 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

54413 readers
1185 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've got two domain names set up for work and personal email, but I'm absolutely drowning in unread emails, around 4,000. Most are those annoying notifications like "Your security code is xxx," "Your parcel has shipped," and requests to rate my experience.

Right now, I've been trying out Inbox Zero with an old Gmail account. It's cool, but honestly feels a bit overkill and only works with Gmail and Outlook. I switched to my own domains to get away from Google in the first place!

So, I’m on the hunt for an email provider that has solid SPAM filters and can create a priority inbox without all the pesky notification clutter. Bonus points if it supports custom domains.

Any suggestions?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ji_reilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

Echoing the base principle I see in other comments: proactively limit what can land in your inbox. I have a rule in Fastmail that only mail from senders in my contacts gets to inbox. If no rules apply, mail ends up in the firewall folder, which I check periodically.

I've been on a big unsubscribe wave for newsletters and notifications that I had previously opted into. If I haven't been reading them within a week, they get dropped. Next step is to resume use of RSS for the topics I want to periodically check up on instead of crowding my email.

The other base principle is to segregate email addresses for personal correspondence and interactions with companies/services/accounts. I've not been good about that out of laziness. That's more about data privacy and while most of my FnF still use gmail it is moot.

[–] DumbRedNeck1@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm doing trial periods at fastmail, zoho and namecheap (fronting for titan ).
Zoho will fail back to a low volume, web only version if the bill doesn't get paid while the others just stop working.

Those were pretty much the top three I found across all the "top 10" reviews I could find -- aside from the ones that obviously cater to spamming (marketing) customers.

Would love to see reasons for/against them.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

I've been using Zoho for about 6 months and have no complaints. I pay about $12 a year for a couple of gigs of storage - not a huge amount, but enough for personal email as long as you delete stuff fairly regularly.

You can create up to 30 email aliases, which I use a lot. For instance, I have an email address for newsletters, a couple for generic web logins, and then some specific ones for important accounts such as banking.

It's easy to make filters to sort email as it arrives. This is how I handle the "priority inbox" situation. Any email from my family or other important senders is all put into a single folder, and I have an email app on my phone which checks this folder and notifies me of new mail. All other mail is either moved by other filters e.g. newsletters or just left in the inbox.

[–] maus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm chronically bad at not marking emails as read and suffer the same bloat. For handing emails security codes and shipping notifications,I use Proton mails Sieve filters.

Specifically I make it where these type of emails automatically get deleted after 7-30 days based on subject

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 116 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Regardless of which e-mail service you end up using, I find that an incredible simple rule to filter all e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in it's body to another folder saves your sanity. It's still a folder you should go through a few times a week to read all the newsletters and shit you're subscribed to, and sometimes the occasional false positive, but your inbox will mostly contain e-mail you actually want to read. I have another rule that filters mail from specific senders that I want to read immediately to my Inbox before it hits the unsubscribe rule, but those exceptions are uncommon enough (I only have 7 after years of doing this) to not take much work.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

This is a great tip!

[–] TechnoCat@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Brilliant tip. Thank you

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Do you not sign up for any newsletters?

[–] jasonweiser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

You can manually add an exception to the rule for trusted senders.

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes, those go to the "unsubscribe" folder, so I read them less often than my normal mail.

[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you can use kill-the-newsletter to receive those via rss

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Doesn't work, in my experience.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m not self hosting email but my rule is that no email gets to be in the inbox except for VERY rare exceptions

When an email lands in my inbox, I immediately make a rule that labels it correctly and moves it the fuck away from my inbox.

This way I can have notifications on for inbox emails and they’ll either be important or a new sender whose next email will end up labeled and NOT in my inbox

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

but I'm absolutely drowning in unread emails, around 4,000

WTF are you doing with your e-mail address that you get these amounts of mails. These are more mails than I got in the last decade.

At first maybe try to unsubscribe whatever you subscribed and stop putting your address into random services. Use a temporary mail for stuff like that.

Also mail filters can help with sorting mails from certain senders into folders. Bascially every provider has them and if not programs like Thunderbird have these built in on the client side.

Most are those annoying notifications like "Your security code is xxx," "Your parcel has shipped," and requests to rate my experience.

Uhm simply delete them when you e.g. inputted the code or got your parcel? Or change the settings that you no longer get them?

So, I’m on the hunt for an email provider that has solid SPAM filters...

Under your circumstances no provider in the world can do that, because nobody can determine if your "Your security code is xxx" mail is spam or legitimate... YOU have to determike that for yourself.

[–] Markus29@feddit.nl 2 points 18 hours ago

I have no idea, it's an old email I used for a lot of services before I knew about email aliases like Mozilla relay.

Like I said, most of them are useful once, like a shipping notification or a sign in security code. But most of the time I just copy the code from the desktop notification and leave the email. I don't know why so many services moved from a password based login to email security codes, it's annoying that's for sure.

I'll try to set up some filters to delete them after a day.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't unsubscribe, just send to spam. Unsubscribe just confirms you're a real person and you get put on a list for more spam. Spam folder achieves the same thing without sending any sort of signal back to the sender. Also if enough people flag it, it'll go in my spam folder automatically. Thank you for your service.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

When you're getting notifications/newsletters from legitimate platforms like e.g. Amazon or GitHub it's smarter to unsubscribe from these specific mails. Otherwise you will be screwed when some important mail somehow ends up in the spam folder.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing important goes in my email.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not sure what this sentence means, but feel free to use pigeons instead.

[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use the Thunderbird email client to set up filters which send email to set folders.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Same. pfsense will filter a lot of spam with Spamhaus_Drop type feeds. Then T-Bird with a lot of rules for different sorting options. Also, I use a lot of alias email addresses so those are easy to filter right into the trash can. It's interesting to watch who sells my aliases.

[–] kumi@feddit.online 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How about using sieve rules? A nice plus is that if you ever move to self-hosted in the future, you can bring it with you.

I know at least Fastmail supports user-configured sieve. I don't have experience with Fastmail myself but in general mostly heard good things.

https://www.cstrahan.com/blog/taming-email-with-fastmail-rules/

http://sieve.info/tutorials

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

One of these can just be solved with a mailbox rule within the email client itself for what it’s worth. Make a rule that’s based on keywords in the subject line and have them moved into a folder that you clear out every couple of months. Downside is the email client need to be running/opened for it to process them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

You can do most of that without any fancy AI or machine learning: Since you already have your own domain, setup some mail redirects and filter all mails going into them into subfolders. I have a redirect for onlineshopping where all those order confirmation and delivery informations and unwanted newsletters go. I have another I use for creating accounts - all 2FA etc. are going there. And then I have the main mail for actual communication and another redirect for all those interesting substack newsletters and so on.

[–] ugo@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use my own version of inbox zero.

I manually archive emails I might need in the future (like rent payment confirmations, job position applications that got past the screening interview, official correspondence with local administrative bodies, and very few other things).

I keep things that need action or are ongoing in the inbox (like online orders until they arrive, event tickets).

I delete useless emails (newsletters, code confirmations, online order emails or event tickets once the order arrives or the event passed) possibly preceded by unsubscribing.

That’s it, I usually have 0 to 3 emails in my inbox. No plugins, no filters.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

This is the way.

[–] stagen@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago

I can recommend the Spark Desktop email client, you can use it for free and without subscribing.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
IMAP Internet Message Access Protocol for email
IP Internet Protocol
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
VPN Virtual Private Network
VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)

5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 12 acronyms.

[Thread #988 for this comm, first seen 9th Jan 2026, 10:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Get a proton mail. The complete plan not only supports custom domains, they also let you create unlimited alias.

This is the best thing ever. Alias work with custom domains too and they basically give you an endless amount of single-use emails allowing you to sign to each service/website with a different email (that will then be forwarded to your inbox).

This not only leaves your real email safe and unexposed, but it also lets you organize your inbox more tidily if your aliases have a structure and you use email rules for them (e.g. you can create aliases for your shipping stuff called [website].shipping@[myalias].com and then make a rule including all the adresses .shipping to a specific folder).

[–] Witziger_Waschbaer@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

That's what I do, but with mailbox.org instead of proton, to name an alternative. They even offer temporary random addresses with the click of a button.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

Everyone suggests proton and their whole infra just makes me sus. Just because of how much they are the "go to" alternative.

Maybe I'm paranoid. But I feel like these companies that focus on "privacy" are just not as good as we all assume.

It's like all the YouTube sponsored segments of "Ingogni". It just makes me feel like these companies that sell "privacy" are just consolidating data on the people that are worried about their privacy.

This is less a comment about proton I guess. But, incogni, is sus as fuck. Like, really, "give us all your personal info and we'll "scrub" it from the internet, trust us."

Are they sharing your emails. Probably not. But I just don't really trust anything.

Edit: lots of strong responses. Which I appreciate. But, my comment was more "vibes" based on Proton. But I'll take a stand on these "Ingogni" types services. I think they are sus as fuck.

If you don't trust anything, then your only option is self-host everything,

Is Proton perfect? Not at all. Are they better than Google? Well... if you trust the external audits (1) and external sources in general (2), then, they probably are.

But if you don't trust anything, then you probably don't trust those audits either, so it's pointless to even mention them.

(1) https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/proton-vpns-no-logs-policy-holds-up-under-scrutiny-of-fourth-independent-audit

(2) https://www.webpronews.com/unlocking-proton-mails-encryption-fortress-a-deep-dive-into-secure-email-mastery/

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Ingogni is super suspicious and I don't believe what they claim to do is even possible. But to me it's what they claim to do that makes them suspicious, and that's and entirely different thing than what proton does, and at least proton has documented audits to back up their privacy claims. INB4 the links to articles talking about proton complying with law enforcement requests, every company does that, even respected ones like mullvad. It's not important that they hand over information they're legally required to, it's important that they save as little as possible so they can hand over everything without identifying you.

And also, any privacy conscious service is never better than your own opsec, so if you get caught because your recovery email was your apple ID, that's on you and not them.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Guys...it's Incogni. Like incognito?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

This comment describes Brave browser

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Unlike those “we will delete your data for you.” Services. Proton operates under a Zero Knowledge Encryption, I.E. no one even themselves can read your emails.

Is it perfect? No obviously, if you use a recovery email that is not properly secured (say a Gmail account.) then congratulations your now vulnerable via the State asking Google.

But the privacy focus IS genuine

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›