this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
53 points (96.5% liked)

The Deprogram Podcast

1677 readers
154 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).

Resources:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What are some of your guys' biggest red flags when it comes to talking to people about politics? (they don't really know what they're talking about) Personally one of mine is when people call the USSR Russia

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

I'm a Westerner so I know that our politics are unpopular here. With this in mind I try to look for common ground on specific issues. Usually my red flags are when I detect a naive reactionary or anti-solidarity sentiment.

E.g. 1: one time I was on a second date with someone, and they started hating on homeless people towards the end. This led to me not dating them further.

E.g. 2: People who say racist things about South Asian people. This is very specific to my geographic context, but basically they're probably the most highly persecuted immigrant population within my slice of the world and face a fuckton of systemic racism. Obviously racism in general I find intolerable, it's just that due to South Asian immigrant vulnerability, this one stands out as very immediately and acutely harmful as well.

[–] KoloradoKoolAid75@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 14 hours ago

Honestly, I can create a flow chart with the red flags and their corresponding right-wingers and non–MLs.

Slandering AES is a certain way to find a non–ML. If they believe Atatürk was a leftist politician determines whether they're an ultra or a left anti–com.

Condemning the global north but using its talking points while talking about contemporary politics is a solid sign of a right-winger. I don't bother about finding their tendencies, but they tend to give it away with their rhetorics anyway.

[–] rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

For me, it is the following:

  • They use US flags in their cloths or their profile picture in their social media even though they are Latin American compatriots

  • They talk about the fascist Elon as if he was a genius or someone of high regard.

  • They talk about Bukele(or worse Milei fan) as if his fascist police state was the answer to their country's problem.

Any of these are signs that they are fascist/imperialist sympathizers.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

I think those are all more then just signs tbh.

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

Yeah when people are such blatant cipayos they advertise they're unable to talk about reality lol

[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 28 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

any utterance or sympathy towards the following:

"both sides"

Civility™

"marketplace of ideas"

any form of "i don't like people" - usually said after seeing bad news, wanting to get away from the badness and evility of the world. people who do this are either fascists, cowards, or selfish to an insane degree

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"The free world" is probably my (least) favorite one.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 12 points 18 hours ago

We should adopt that one to refer to AES countries.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Racism.

I was on a date with a lady from Hong Kong recently and she started complaining about how there was Muslims on the subway here.

I was like, what do you mean?

'Oh I was so scared!'

Like they wherent doing anything she just associated them with terrorism and crime.

Yeah they arent getting a 2nd date lol.

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The anti-decolonial tendancies from certain Hong Kongers is not much more than this:

  • England no longer wanted to trade ill-gotten silver from the Americas for Chinese wares so they brutally forced Indians to farm opium, and when the Chinese did not want to trade with opium the English bombed their coastline to submission, and the English as further prize for winning that war resulted in the annexation of Hong Kong and the creation of HSBC bank to launder that drug money.
  • The crumbs of that wealth was used to develop Hong Kong, and instead of having solidarity with mainland chinese, indians and global south who effectively subdised their quality of living they instead see solidarity with brutal fascists of empire. There is not much saving these particles of Hitler.

Needless to say this may not go down well but it may be satisfying.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Absolutely spot on.

I lived in HK for 6 months so im familiar with the type.

People native to hk tend to either be like cool with communism and pro China and also not a reactoid, or this kind of lady which is basically someone who was cool with the apartheid and segregation and is vocally super racist against anyone who isn't white.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

which is basically someone who was cool with the apartheid and segregation and is vocally super racist against anyone who isn't white

Lot of people don't know this about Hong Kong, that it used to have basically an apartheid system under which British colonizers were subject to completely different laws than the Chinese population, and even had their own exclusive parts of the city where no Chinese were allowed to live.

Also the biggest irony of the so-called "pro-democracy" demonstrators in Hong Kong who were waving all those British flags is that there was no democracy under British rule. The British just appointed the colonial governor who ruled with an iron fist. There is more democracy now in HK than there was for 99% of the colonial era.

When there were anti-British protests in the 1960s in HK, the British colonial authorities just gunned down dozens of people. Compare that to the much more violent and much more extensive HK riots a few years ago when the police didn't kill a single person.

I know they are a small minority but how any ethnically Chinese Hong Kongers can still be simping for the colonial era is something I will never understand.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 20 hours ago

Yeah when she was done moaning about being in the same subway carriage as someone she perceived to be Muslim (like lets be honest, they where just clearly SE asian im not sure how she could tell) she immediately started talking about how much she hated 'mainlanders' lol.

I did manage to get in some bits about how I really liked Mao and Deng though and how nicer Shenzhen is relative to HK lol....

[–] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

The amazing part, to me, is that these two halves manage to get along just fine in everyday life and work. There's obvious tension when the topics come up, but until you float that tension you can't really tell one from the other (unless they own an EV, in which case it's Tesla vs all the mainland brands and that indicator hasn't failed me yet).

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

Racism or chauvinism toward people in the global south.

I can talk with a person who has misconceptions about socialist states due to anti-communist indoctrination. I can't do much to change someone's mind who just views non-Europeans as subhuman.

And the same goes for people who look at the poor as "lesser than" and blame their situation on "their own failures".

Disagreeing on politics, economics or history is one thing. A lot of people are ignorant, uneducated or miseducated. That's just something we have to learn to deal with. But when it enters the territory of dehumanization that's when it crosses a line.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

when it enters the territory of dehumanization that’s when it crosses a line

This is the straw that broke my liberalism. When the SMO started and all of reddit was chanting "death to orks" I realized that the difference between the western "rules based order" and nazism was cosmetic.

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Pro-lqbtq+ zionist liberals do this against the Palestinians all the time whenever they see a queer leftist who advocates for the emancipation of Palestine. They almost always weaponize Islamophobia to make their argument. Little do they realize is that Israel has murdered way more queer people in Palestine Hamas could have ever imagined.

[–] AYJANIBRAHIMOV@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

“Disagreeing on politics, economics or history is one thing. A lot of people are ignorant, uneducated or miseducated. That’s just something we have to learn to deal with. But when it enters the territory of dehumanization that’s when it crosses a line.”

Same, 100% agree 👍🏼

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 23 hours ago

But when it enters the territory of dehumanization that’s when it crosses a line.

It is the point where changing the material conditions to sublimate the "fasciopathy" becomes insurmountable by the individual.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 30 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

For discussions "tankie". It suggests they have gone down that particular liberal anticommunism rabbit hole, they have people reinforcing these believes, and they aren't interested in genuine discussion beyond name calling. Very unlikely that you manage to change their mind or even just have an interesting or pleasant conversation.

In person, there might be enough common ground to do something. Online, stay clear.

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

It is sometimes an oppurtunity to advertise for those lurking how awesome being a tankie is.

https://redsails.org/tankies/

https://redsails.org/dont-work-that-way/

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Leftist infighting as a performance. Not sure who that's good for.

I just tell them I wish we had tanks and block. But honestly on Lemmy I don't encounter those people much, I know where they are.

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Leftist infighting as a performance

True but given the limitations of being (terminally?) online it may help battle test our framings for the non-online world.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 9 points 21 hours ago

I found that I can just be online somewhere else or block people.

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Calls Khmer Rouge communists.

  2. Thinks we need to disavow violence to do progressive politics.

  3. Calls China State capitalist.

  4. Believes former bourgeois diaspora from socialist countries were innocent victims affected by communist dictators.

  5. Talks about ethnic 'homogeneity' as a characteristic for lower crime rates in a country.

  6. Calls George Orwell a good writer.

  7. Thinks 'lend-lease' defeated Nazism.

[–] syzygy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Calls George Orwell a good writer.

I take it Orwell isn't popular around these parts?

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Even his politics could have been forgivable if he wasn't a mediocre, overrated writer.

[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 6 points 16 hours ago

"I have decades of experience in X intensely-capitalized industry (like the pharmaceutical industry), and all other countries' successes in that field are because of the US"

[–] roux@hexbear.net 17 points 22 hours ago

Piggybacking of yours, when someone thinks that Russia is socialist.

Mine are "both sides are bad", "the Nordic countries are socialist", and the classic "better dead than red" rhetoric.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 22 hours ago

I'm autistic so if I talk to anyone more than a 2 minutes I've said "the billionaires are destroying the planet and will kill us all if we don't kill them first" If they don't run from that we are good. I'll push back on bigotry but If they want the billionaires dead I'll be willing to explain that all prejudice is a learned behavior that is fostered by the ruling class to keep us divided.

[–] yunqihao@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If I'm talking about China with someone and they call the CPC the CCP I know I'm in for a long winded rambling of liberal/fascist slop 9 times out of 10. Although it is kind of nice to have as an almost shibboleth that lets me know straight away where the bar is.

[–] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, does the spelling matter?

[–] yunqihao@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

CPC: Communist Party of China.

CCP: Chinese Communist Party

CPC is technically correct and follows the same style as every other communist party i.e. CPSU, CPI etc.

For some reason western libs decided to start calling it the CCP instead, my leading theory is that it was a redscare propaganda tactic to draw it closer to the CCCP in peoples minds during the propoganda torrent.

The end result in the end is that libs, ultras, fascists etc. tend to say CCP while ML's MLM's etc. say CPC.

[–] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

Interesting. I always assumed it was because "Chinese Communist Party" rolls off the tongue better but thank you for letting me know. I'll try to avoid saying "CCP" from now on.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

CPC is the offical english acronym of the party. However there wasn't a offcial one for a while, thus often the literal translation of the parties name from mandarin was used, with the corresponding acronym CCP.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 12 points 22 hours ago

They're Americans

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 19 hours ago

When a person commenting or replying to you on Youtube has no profile picture and their username contains a generic Western name.

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't mind liberals equating USSR with Russia, not because it is factually accurate (it most certainly is not) but because they concede a common ground that western european aggression eastward precedes fall of the USSR and that current anglo-saxon geopolitics is an extension of nazism/lebensraum.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

And the fact we have to even use nazism as a "universal" proxy for what is considered evil says it all. One can imagine without german fascism seen as a competition against USAmerican and English imperial interests, and then the subsequent defeat of it by socialists, we wouldn't even have that to use as a baseline (with Westerners) for what we would like to consider is not acceptable against humanity.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 6 points 21 hours ago

Saying Ew a lot, talking about iq