this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
1274 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

78511 readers
2999 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Because, it's NEVER been about protecting kids, or other vulnerable people. The filthy rich don't give one flying fuck about vulnerable people.

[–] OldGrayDog@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 hours ago

If you want to get it banned, make some deepfake porn of them and their family members and watch how fast it disappears.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Time to spread vids of Cook and Pichai 69ing

this was as close as I could get without burning too many rainforests--maybe people with better AI skillz can get an actual image of them fucking

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because money. And the laws are useless against them.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

And the blackmail in daily life

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I've been an Apple user since the 80s, I used to be penpals with their CFO Ellen Hancock. Would get care packages from their PR team full of promo items. Exchanged emails with Wozniak and Jobs. I was deeply obsessed.

Obviously things have drifted away from the core "underdog" vibe that Apple exemplified for so long, as their popularity and device adoption surged, they've been less of the Apple I knew.

But Cook's behavior this year has me realizing I've bought my last Apple device. Bring on Linux in every form.

I know I don't matter at all, but it would have taken epic amounts of bullshit to make me sour on them, and here we are.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I recently saw a video about what changed and it’s very clear that it is almost entirely Tim Cook’s fault. He’s a rotten snake who no one ever seemed to really like and who was constantly wrong about nearly everything and yet was left in charge and, with zero surprise whatsoever, immediately and consistently fucked it all up.

He was handed a roadmap to making money without sacrificing quality or much integrity(corporations seem hell-bent on making sure they always suck a little bit at the very least) and he threw it away to be a little bitch instead.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yep, sounds like Tim Apple. XD Could you send a link to the video? Sounds interesting.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Your individual change is a drop in the ocean but everyone making that change is a tidal wave. I have very recently moved to linux after almost 30 years using windows. It is an incredible set of OSs with brilliant support from a fantastic community and it keeps getting better.

We need to make the change and encourage others too.

[–] bdama@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You're not alone. Used to be the biggest Apple fan, worked there for nearly ten years until 2023.

Last year I made the cut, the new PC I bought was custom built and is running Linux. My MacBook Air is running Asahi Fedora Remix primarily and the iPhone was sold on. Disconnecting from iCloud was a pain, getting pictures off of their system took me three months but it was worth it. Self hosting my stuff now and 2026 is the year to switch my family and friends over as well.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I used Apple with an Apple 2, then once bought an Apple laptop just before they switched to intel cpus as an experiment. For reference I had already been running Linux for years at the time, so that was a test. It lasted three or four months before I ran back to Kde, couldn't stand how rigid, awkward and closed the interface was. As an aside, it was pretty much impossible to extract my data from their "photos" app. They renamed everything and dumed it in a maze of illegible directories.
That was my last contact with Apple.

Even Microsoft felt more user friendly to me.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Just finishing off setting up ElementaryOS on my wife's early 2015 MacBook Air. It's based on Ubuntu LTS, but with a custom theme to make it macOS-esque. Seems pretty good so far, but time will tell if she enjoys using it.

Edit: Everything but the webcam just worked out of the box. The webcam was a motherfuck though. Took the better part of 3hrs trawling forums to find the full instructions for installing the kernel module to get it running....

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 31 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Post deepfake porn of them and their wives or husbands on X.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago

That’s…actually a pretty good idea.

[–] Leonardo_da_Vinci@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

More views, more ads. Go ahead make them richer.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Time to find out if they are into sph.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Sometimes I have the impression X is doing everything to be removed to the App Store so Musk can sue and get rid of the guidelines. And as we can see here we can do even CSAM on his social network and no one do anything, this should be a matter of law, not a private company like Google or Apple.

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago

It appears to demonstrate that it's very much profit over principles and values.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I mean Grok is literally being used to make CSAM so it should not only be taken down but the law should get involved in any reasonable country.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's just crazy dude. Give pedos an opportunity, and they WILL take advantage of it. You could be making an image hosting app for frickin octogenarians and they'll somehow discover it and use it as their spank bank. I hate that shit.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 18 hours ago

how many times do we have to say it

the law is optional for corporations and the rich

the law is for oppressing the poor and justifying it

[–] Bunbury@feddit.nl 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way? At least some countries might need a law change first before tackling this.

Edit: I checked the local law where I’m located and it’s “images or videos depicting a minor during a sexual act”. I’d argue these AI generated images aren’t of minors because they don’t exist. We probably need new laws first unless it’s provable that the images represent a specific real life minor.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way?

Legally, yes. The law in the UK also includes images of children that are drawn or computer generated.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I had kind of assumed this was the case in a lot of countries with one of the more prominent exception being Japan (we have a lot of fucked up manga/anime).

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

Japan had legal Child Porn until disconcertingly recently.

[–] Bunbury@feddit.nl 2 points 16 hours ago

Good. I also read a bit more into it and while I’m not located in the UK apparently there is a specific extension to the law that also includes drawings and “collage” type edits. It doesn’t mention AI yet but surely this should count.

RIP my search history. But I’m glad we don’t need to wait for the law to catch up (in some places). Now all we have to do is scream from the rooftops that the laws need to be applied. Or even better: sue someone.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they are indeed cowards.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

"Coward" implies that they want to do good, but are too scared to do so. There's no reason to think that, and indeed we shouldn't. They want money and Elon makes them money; that's all there is to it. If ethics mattered to them at all, they wouldn't have been able to climb to the position of CEO of a major corporation in the first place.

[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They pulled Tumblr over cartoon porn, but using AI to sexually abuse actual women and children is all good, apparently.

It's because they fear what Musk might do.

Twitter should be banned for making CSAM.

[–] sigh@lemmy.world 164 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this is actually a pretty wild headline to appear on the verge frontpage

good on them

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I see a lot of people hate The Verge and I don’t understand why. Is it perfect? No. But, I think they have a pretty solid ethics policy and they call out bullshit.

I like 404 better but Verge is by no means bad.

Maybe there was an issue with them that I don’t know about? Idk!

[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

An eon ago they made a PC building guide that was riddled with mistakes and had to pull it down again and I think that's still where most of that comes from.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck Tim Apple and Sundar Google.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If you have an Apple account take a min to report it.

https://reportaproblem.apple.com/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are not cowards, they don't give a single shit about it. There isn't enough backlash to effect Google so Google doesn't care. That is how corporations deal with every subject. They don't treat child porn differently becuase it's one of the more henious offenses; it's simply another rule broken and it is delt woth the same way as anyother broken law or rule: ignore it or throw money at it and admit no wrong doing.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

It’s the opposite. They are cowards. Any move to do the right thing makes you a target for oh dear leader (who is also a pedophile). So they ignore it because it’s more profitable to avoid falling out with the administration. The only value a corporation has is greed.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Money and mutually assured destruction (blackmail-able info).

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Not just blackmail, if either had the balls to ban twitter I don't imagine the large orange fascist would keep his mouth shut and not retaliate. So it's also extortion!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Everyone watched as Tim Apple bowed and kissed the ring. 'Coward' was already his namesake.

[–] xep@discuss.online 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

More proof that rules and guidelines only apply to those without power or privilege.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago

Because billionaires like to stick together because they think that they're better than all of us combined.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because billionaires like these two, and the corporations that they run, believe they’re largely not accountable to the law nor cultural pressure. They exist in a cloud of privilege that never holds them to account for truth, justice nor anyone’s wellbeing as long as the investors get paid. They are sociopaths.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›