this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
58 points (98.3% liked)

World News

55500 readers
2650 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

State media said on Saturday that the army took over the northern city of Tabqa and its adjacent dam, as well as the major Freedom dam, formerly known as the Baath, west of the Syrian city of Raqaa. It came despite US calls to halt the advance.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What passed according to the article: Syrian government troops were supposed to take a batch of land on the western side of Euphrates, but launched a larger offensive, forced Kurdish troops to retreat and crossed the river at two points at major dams.

Personal opinion: the president's decree, while it looked friendly to Kurds, was most likely a simple feint, and being a decree (not a law, elections haven't been held and there is no new parliament) can be taken back and isn't worth the paper it's written on.

For some reason I'm not fully aware of, January is the typical time of wars and offensive operations starting in Syria. At this time, the Syrian central government cannot be trusted for more than 60 seconds. Sadly, the SDF is not what it used to be, and has likewise worn down its trust among people. It is not a very effective fighting force.

Against the much larger Syrian army, Kurds are going to lose, unless they retake their riverside at the dams + find a channel for obtaining drones and antidrone tech (getting more artillery is likely an unattainable goal for them). At this point, I don't think they can retake those points or obtain sufficient technology.

They likely know they're in danger, as they proceeded with blowing up some bridges across the Euphrates. The problem is: this still leaves them holding some Arab-majority areas which the Syrian governement definitely wants.

French and US diplomats and military are trying to calm down the conflict without participating in it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

Free Kurdistan!

[–] speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish it weren’t so, but you’re hitting all sorts of nails on the heads. Long live Rojava. Down with jihadis, and so long as the so-called Syrian army is headed by a jihadist, down with them.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

P.S.

Allegedly (but I trust that BBC checks its sources well) there is a cease-fire agreement. It looks extremely unfavourable to the Kurds, and promises to al-Sharaa that he'll get almost everything.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gwk37ewvwo

However, when I checked out what's being written on "Kurdish Front News" (telegram channel, not news outlet, content warning, some videos depict death and violence, source ) I found a contradicting claim:

"It is important to note that, as of the time of writing, neither the SDF, Mazloum Abdi, the Autonomous Administration, nor any of their officials or media offices have announced acceptance of this agreement."

However, al-Sharaa is pictured presenting a document with signatures (which I can't verify) so I sort of expect that the ceasefire was signed by both sides, and a statement by the AANES / SDF will follow.

I think it will be confirmed in the following days that there has been heavy fighting for Raqqa (north / east of Euphrates, 500 000 inhabitants by the last count, largest city in previously Kurdish-held area, with an Arab majority population) between SDF and HTS (government troops backed by militias of some Arab tribes). According to ABC News, SDF has lost the town to Syrian government. source This would make it clear that the river can't work as a borderline between forces any more.

In short, it looks bad.

It could be that the autonomy of North-East Syria is over really soon, SDF will try to save its people by integrating with the Syrian army, and those who don't want that will hide their weapons and go underground to wait. If the Syrian central government proves central enough and not democratic enough (currently it's an oligarchy of former terrorists, now called government officials)... I predict that soon enough, quite numerous Syrian Kurds will want to leave their homeland.

[–] speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

“oligarchy of former terrorists”

Perfectly stated.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where is the tankie that was saying the New Syrian Regime is good actually yesterday?

What a piece of shit and/or rube earning the fell for it again award!

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think it would be better if we didn't judge other posters based on off-mark opinions.

That poster seemed like a reasonable person in some other matters. But their opinion on this topic seemed far too optimistic, given that troop movements and military activity were increasing at the same time. :(