this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
378 points (99.2% liked)

Europe

9111 readers
1846 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The safety organisation VeiligheidNL estimates that 5,000 fatbike riders are treated in A&E [ i.e Accident & Emergency] departments each year, on the basis of a recent sample of hospitals. “And we also see that especially these young people aged from 12 to 15 have the most accidents,” said the spokesperson Tom de Beus.

Now Amsterdam’s head of transport, Melanie van der Horst, has said “unorthodox measures” are needed and has announced that she will ban these heavy electric bikes from city parks, starting in the Vondelpark. Like the city of Enschede, which is also drawing up a city centre ban, she is acting on a stream of requests “begging me to ban the fatbikes”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Makes sense that they would cause issues when there are so many bicycles and pedestrians around.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Make it so they have to be licensed, insured and are legal on the roads. But then allow for the bikes to have speed increases.

Basically a really cheap electric motorcycle.

[–] xuakzon@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

seen this in CH. (my first lemmy comment 🖖)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (8 children)

These are not fatbikes. Fatbikes are normal pedal bikes with big tires that are good in snow.

These are Fat Tire e-bikes. You should always be calling them ebikes when discussing them in English. Perhaps this is a mis translation.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

e-bike is also horribly misused. It's everything from a bike with a little battery that kicks in a bit when you pedal, to what can only be described as an electric powered motorbike.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (9 children)

It's in the first par. of the article.

" .. thick-tyred electric bikes.. the Dutch call “fatbikes”

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

human powered locomotion (foot, bike, skate, etc) and mobility assist devices, should be completely separate from motorized vehicles (electric bike, scooter, cars, combustion,etc). simple as.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

That is sort of true. Electric bikes are allowed because they provide assistance only when humans are riding (pedal assist), never autonomously. The initial idea was to help elderly people cycle. The category has been abused over the years in such a way that we now have bikes that compete with motorized vehicles and unsafe import that is easy to tweak, pushing bikes way beyond their legally intended limits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 101 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (24 children)

That was sadly exactly what I was expecting from the electric motorization of bicycles. It is a history that has repeated itself many times in the last 70 or 80 years since the first combustion engine mopeds.

The fact is that the human-powered bike is at a sweet spot of efficiency and safety. Once you go faster, you need a helmet, a heavier frame, wider tyres, better brakes, wider lanes, protective clothing, protection against cold, a heavier motor for propelling all the extra weight, and so on. The energy input from you the human dwindles.

It is not any more a bicycle.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 3 days ago (37 children)

You need a helmet on purely muscle-powered bicycles, too. A helmet saved both mine and my father's life in accidents that would not had happened were we not riding bikes that moment.
A majority of bicycle accident fatalities could have been prevented with helmets.
Wear helmets. There are cool models, too, don't try that excuse.

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Oh man I got a concussion while wearing a bike helmet I probably would have died if I wasnt wearing it. And we were just kids makings jumps in the driveway...

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The annoying part is having to carry the helmet around with you when bike is parked.

load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] JackBinimbul@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why are 12 year olds even allowed to drive what is essentially a motorbike?

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

A question the Dutch government won't answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Let's give motorcycles with insane torque to children, What could go wrong?

Most of those even don't need you to pedal (which where I live is a prerequisite for e-bikes).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who knew that reinventing the motorcycle for like the third time was going to have the exact same result.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ian@feddit.uk 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think the laws where I am in Germany are stricter than the Netherlands. But it's always worth trying more granular rules. Such as age limit, helmets for kids, fines for increasing performance, speed limit or ban in parks. This is fairer, but much harder to police than an outright ban. But big enough fines should be a deterrent. And might be preferred by fat bikers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The second I saw the first fat bike I knew it was a bad idea

It's literally a worst of all worlds type vehicle, why are they so popular anyway? Is it just the "cool" factor?

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

they can go around 45 kph with minimal pedaling and doesn't require a moped license.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They should require a license...

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Exactly, they're misclassified mopeds (which do require a license, helmet, and rider age at least 16)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Yes, these bikes can be dangerous. I've seen, and almost be hit by people riding them top speed on a shared pathway.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›