this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

9111 readers
1846 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

On the plus side, kids under 15 should be taught not to give their names, ages, locations, or any other personal data on the internet. Avoiding the bans that providers would have to enforce against them instills long-term privacy consciousness, making them better netizens in the future.

On the minus, the kid is now violating the law when they get online. They are going to conceal their online activities from the responsible adults in their lives. Groomers and other predators are going to have a field day.

What the ban absolutely won't do is reduce screen time or keep kids off social media.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

Also without further education - congrats, now you're fifteen. Here's your free unfiltered access to propaganda, AI slop, sponsored posts (and occasionally post from your friends)

VPN use is gonna skyrocket. If kids want on the internet, they WILL find a way. They're a lot more technologically adept than these dinosaurs in power.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Itβ€˜s the laziest way to deal with that issue and therefore the least effective. It can only backfire in my opinion. Minors need education not bans.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Also on the minus, now everyone has to provide ID in some way to legally access social media.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a good way to kill social media. Anti-social media will thrive in such an environment.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On the plus side, kids under 15 should be taught not to give their names, ages, locations, or any other personal data on the internet

Yeah, but this ban won't achieve any of this, but it'll undermine everyone's privacy and security.

Social media fuck up people of all ages. These bans don't fix the underlying problem.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure it will. To bypass the ban, kids will be forced to conceal their identities. If they expose themselves, the platforms will be compelled to close their accounts. The consequence of failure to maintain privacy is the inconvenience of opening a new account.

This ban would teach kids to lie better. To conceal their identities online.

That certainly isn't the objective of the ban, but it would be a positive consequence.

Unfortunately, the negative consequences almost certainly outweigh the positive.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago

I still am kind of shocked how this is going:

  • Kids unter 15 can't afford their own smartphones or computers. Parents are buying those. Parents are also providing the internet access as no provider accept you if you're that underage. So parents are giving their kids unsupervised internet access without monitoring what they are doing?
  • There's no way to enforce this without rolling out ID requirements for everybody. So parents not parenting their kids are leading to me having to upload my ID to fucking Facebook or even Lemmy? That is not ok and not a good way to do this
  • If those kids are getting 15, they are free to post on Elon Musk child porn-generating platform X? Why not force those companies to provide a safe space for everyone without a child-porn generator, without predators grooming children and without those platforms causing depression and suicides? Why should that be ok for 16 year old kids or even adults?
[–] Kastael@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I think it would be better just to ban smart phones from kids. If they absolutely need to use social media, they have to do it on a desktop computer.