The Deprogram

1843 readers

90 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985

International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.

Rules:

No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.

Resources:

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

airbusairnet@lemmygrad.ml

Ancient_Egg_57@lemmygrad.ml

I'll protect her with my life (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by ComradeCircuit@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

She is the seventh head of Communism, after Marx-Engels-Luxemburg-Lenin-Stalin-Thunberg.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Malkhodr@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 month ago

The zionist smear campaign against this woman are utterly despicable.

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Long live Marxism-Leninisn-Rachelism!

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Marxism-Leninism-Ms. Rachel Thought

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

who is she?

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

US content creator who makes content for little children. Her stuff would fit perfectly on TV but as far as I know it's all self-produced and published online instead of traditional networks. She also does in-person shows and other things.

She became prominent because she is vocal about her support for Palestine (though she doesn't always have the right take), at a cost in her personal life, and she has a big audience. Random news piece about her, should provide some preliminary details: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/04/ms-rachel-gaza-children

I think one reason she became this prominent is because she seems genuine and her content is appropriate for children, like I said the kind of stuff you'd find on public TV. But -- and this may come as a surprise to some -- I am not a toddler at this time so I've never really delved deeper.

[+] rentasintorn@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Ms Rachel is pretty much a gold standard imo. I'm a parent who is very anal about screen time, don't forbid it but it's extremely curated and controlled, and because I enjoy researching I've consumed a lot of toddler content.

She comes to play, dawg. She beats out all the other toddler slop (even sesame street) because the vast majority of her catalogue is shit you should be doing, just recorded on a screen. She's educated and employing methods that, if you pay attention and pick up, will genuinely help your kid along. There's a dozen 'Ms X' channels out there and if they're worth anything at all it's because they're almost a 1:1 copy of Ms Rachel's content. The rest are slop. Cocomelon is slop. Paw Patrol is slop. Seriously, none of them compare to the actual value of an hour of Ms Rachel.

I say all this because my read of her has been that she's an extremely professional and ethical person. I was watching her with my kid before she came out about Gaza and while I was chuffed in a very parasocial way, I wasn't surprised at all. Dedicated children's educators always carry a huge amount of empathy as they must teach it.

She's filling a niche in the new media toddler landscape that almost everyone else has decided to exploit with pure brainrotting slop. Got me typing up paragraphs with no point just because I want to express her sheer basedness. If Ms Rachel has no fans then I'm dead.

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Thank you, and for providing that article.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

are you planning on becoming a toddler at a later date?

[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Probably next time they need to seduce a billionaire.

[–] 6kb_@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But – and this may come as a surprise to some – I am not a toddler at this time so I’ve never really delved deeper.

ffuck… how will my parasocial relationship with you survive with this revelation (i am jesting idk u as a user)