this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

3904 readers
957 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

This was from another article about it:

About a year later, Chomsky reached out to Bannon and expressed his and Valeria’s disappointment for “having missed you the other night”.

“Jeffrey … gave me your address,” Chomsky wrote. “Hope that we can arrange something else before too long. Lots to talk about.”

Bannon had been out of Trump’s first administration for about a year at that point. “Agree. Would love to connect,” he wrote back, before saying his brother lived in Tucson, Arizona, where Chomsky had started working as a university professor.

Maybe he’s just a horrible person?

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, this raises so many questions and just downright confuses me.

  • Noam Chomsky is a critic of modern capitalism, and just generally on the left. Why in the hell would be want to spend time with Epstein?

  • He seems to believe in Epstein's innocence, even though he had long before been proven guilty. Chomsky is, as far as I can tell, quite the intellectual - did he not know, and if, how could he not know?

  • It legitimately sounds like Chomsky is speaking from the experience of being falsely accused. I mean, he has been arrested a couple of times for his activism, but that's a completely different story than being accused of raping someone or similar. Maybe his experience being on Reagan's list, but still, that would seem like something different to me. Maybe I'm off.

  • Assuming there's nothing more sinister going on with Chomsky (and I really don't know what to think there), what does that tell us about the world and the people around Epstein? I find it odd to have some of the greatest minds with a positive influence but also some of the most disgusting people in the same circle.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Epstein apparently fancied himself an intellectual and cultivated contacts in the sciences for their own sake—he was also a major donor to the Santa Fe Institute and seems to have made a favorable impression there.

I think we underestimate the ability of predators like Epstein to appear as something other than they are when it suits them.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That Hiltzik guy in the email is conveniently now the "crisis manager" for the ex-Microsoft executive who was exposed in the Epstein files for using Epstein to extract a $14 million dollar golden parachute out of Microsoft when he got fired for Windows 8 sucking. It's incredible how interconnected the Epstein class is, it's a small world for them.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Holy shit, that’s wild.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

Epstein’s rizz must have been off the scale. The way this reads, Chomsky didn’t know about the Trump-Epstein child rape blackmail operation and just genuinely thought of Epstein as a trusted friend unfairly targeted by MeToo. Damn.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Is there any chance he didn’t know?

I mean - that reads like he feels bad Jeffy’s going through this as if - as if he doesn’t know. Is that even possible?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Chomsky’s Wikipedia article has a section on his friendship with Epstein. It mentions Chomsky wanting to take his wife to visit Epstein in the Caribbean, which seems an unlikely thing to do if he believed the allegations. But it also sounds like he was was way too dismissive of sexual misconduct allegations in general.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Epstein was first convicted for sexual abuse of children in 2008 (11 years prior to this exchange). I, personally, will not extent the benefit of the doubt to Chomsky, (especially considering the age of his wife), but if you did, it would seem, to me at least, that you would have to conclude either that he was a phenomenally bad judge of character, and naive to a childlike degree; or so enamored with the level of access to people like the former prime minister of Israel which Epstein had that he was willing to not think about it too hard.

Parenti's books were always better anyway...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, it’s just kind of baffling and none of it good. I think the latter might be the conclusion I’m landing on.

[–] itsaphoque@moist.catsweat.com -1 points 3 hours ago

I will be so happy to read his obituary.