this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
176 points (100.0% liked)

World News

53476 readers
2640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

still 55,000 too many but outstanding compared to what i feared

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Compare that to the Russian casualties. Reminds me of the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know the casualties number is not "dead" per se, but even if you go by estimated dead at something like 325k the difference is staggering. More than an order of magnitude more deaths on their side. That's the cost of meat wave tactics versus a modern military.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but he's probably lying, so it's hard to tell how much better Ukraine are doing.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're being downvoted, but honestly, who can really say either way.

During war, we should expect everything officially stated by both sides to be propaganda. Sometimes it's true, sometimes exaggerated, sometimes a lie, either to deceive the enemy, or others.

I want to believe the positive statistics of course, but I take it all with a grain of salt.

Even a good, moral leader would be stupid to always tell the unvarnished truth during wartime.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Russia actually had the manpower and hardware to overwhelm Ukraine and achieve their objectives, they would ahave done so years before now. They are stalling. The west could end this whole conflict relatively quickly if they wanted to. Simply sever all diplomatic AND economic ties with Russia and with any country that doesn't do exactly the same. China and India would fall in line almost instantly and Putin's efforts would collapse like a house of cards.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the main problem I have with western support of Ukraine, it all feels like just enough to take advantage of rebuilding after the war.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

the us is a total trump show now but back before it all started the us agreed along with russia to guarantee their safety and the us really blew off that obligation. I mean japan should really have started building up its military at that point.

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

If I’m understanding what you mean correctly, then that is the point that Japan started building up its military again. The war in Ukraine was a shock to the system for many countries, and Japan was no exception. Their subsequent 2023 force design white paper outlined a whole host of ways that they intended to expand and modernize the force in order to better handle a potential fight if the “rules-based international order” (their words) were to continue its trajectory of instability.

Still, your point stands, as to my understanding, they remain deeply dependent on INDOPACOM for coordination a lot of the time. For example: South Korea is by far one of their best options as regional allies go, but those two haven’t really been able to put aside the hate for each other very effectively. They’re explicitly allied, but most Asia Pacific training operations involving Korea and Japan are configured with the US as the glue holding them together. I, for one, wouldn’t trust that glue to keep holding.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

With friends like the US who needs enemies...

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So, about 5% of the number of Russian conscript casualties?

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 7 points 22 hours ago

The bbc listed 160k confirmed Russian deaths at the end of 2025, with estimates of the actual total between 248 and 325k. So probably around 5-1 which is high for attackers vs defenders (I think historically this is estimated at a 3-1 disadvantage, so 1 defender dies for every 3 attackers).

Meaning Ukraine is doing a pretty good job and Russia a terrible one. Nothing new there

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Contract soldiers, not conscripts.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Casualty doesn't mean death.

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

So it's reached genocidal levels?!