this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
32 points (97.1% liked)

Europe

10113 readers
1090 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 4 points 1 hour ago

She said: β€œI think further integration will require further alignment. But I’m up for that. My Government, Keir’s Government, is up for that, and we are keen to go through a sectoral level of what areas we think we could have deeper alignment in. And some of that could be unilateral and some of it could be negotiated, but I think there’s big opportunities there.”

I think this was called cakeism in season 3 or 4 of Brexit...?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I know I shouldn't - but I'd be lying if I said I didn't cackle.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk -5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (2 children)

Why the cackle? Our standards are higher in most areas than EU ones, we're not 'giving' anything.

We follow ISO standards in pretty much all of the areas we have competitive advantage. ISO standards are based on improving efficiency, not politics and lobbying, unlike EU regulations. Which are also created with boring, restrictive, Roman civil law.

Also...

Reeves pointed specifically to financial services as one area of opportunity, suggesting that the City of London should be a hub for the whole continent not just for Britain.

London is still the hub for the whole continent, the EU failed miserably to take any markets from the UK.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Our standards are higher in most areas than EU ones[...]

Which was also true as EU members. Nothing stopped a member from having higher standards.

ISO standards are based on improving efficiency, not politics and lobbying[...]

Oh my sweet summer child.

London is still the hub for the whole continent[...]

Very true, however brexit hasn't fully happened yet. There are still a lot of deadlines waiting to happen. I doubt that the EU will be happy with its financial center on the outside of the bloc.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 0 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

Deadlines for what?

London clears 900 trillion euro a year in derivatives alone. You need us more than we need EU, not Europe, we are part of Europe, just apart from. We still have the biggest navy and unfortunately we are entering a time where might is right.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

We have the biggest individual navy in Europe (excluding Russia, but... well we've seen how that has been faring), but we do not have a bigger navy than the EU together. If there is some naval threat that the EU cannot handle, we are in an even worse position to try to face it alone. If we're operating on might is right logic then we absolutely need the EU, because we aren't competing with heavyweights like the US and China alone

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

That's not my point at all. We are allies. We don't want to outsource our lawmaking is all. We can make our own rules, common law is more flexible for innovation, our risk appetite is higher than continental Europe.

We are devolving power in the UK, not centralising it somewhere else.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Good job, old chap.

If you really need an explanation why this is funny: Brexit was about how unfair and nasty the EU was being towards GB. And now they realised that, oh wait, actually, there were quite a few benefits, can we please have those back? And we'll even make do without the special treatment, like we got while we were in the EU!

That's a bit funny to me, if I'm being brutally honest.

To be clear: I'd be all for the UK rejoining the EU (you can even keep your currency, my treat). Would be better for both sides. I'm not laughing at the British people, I'm laughing at the political class.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

No one said there were no benefits. What a facile argument. Do better.

agriculture policy for example

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/eu-agrees-relax-green-rules-farming-subsidy-reform-2025-11-11/

EU is winning the race to the bottom. Pretty fucking ironic.