this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
88 points (95.8% liked)

The Deprogram

1806 readers
235 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
  6. Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.

Resources:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Damn already so many replies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 70 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (36 children)

Racist fuckers pretty much asking the Chinese to risk death and nuclear WWIII while they are too incompetent to do fuck all in their own countries (^most lenient scenario. actual scenario - they partake in the benefits of imperialism).

It is left-liberals (whatever the fuck they want to call themselves or even decide to drape themselves in sickle and hammer aesthetics or that annoying fucking A) who effectively prevent the underclasses from overthrowing the government of whatever Western country or vassal state they are in (you take your pick of reasons why including socdem apologism), and thereby nullify the option that if the Chinese do decide to risk a hot war that there would be any real chance of material solidarity and not have to then face retribution of whatever fascists and liberals leftover hellbent on revenge.

It is pretty much these "leftists" who prevent any real hope of Chinese intervention.

Put it this way, if so-called communists cannot see the self-evident truths above then what chance is there with rest of them. The only fucking country that has managed to build a socialist fortress and the rest of you all have the gall to fucking lecture.

/rant over

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Read some history books nerds, Palestine wouldn't even likely still be an alive entity without the historic support China provided. Like the PLO with arms, mediation support and money.

This position has allowed them to exert massive diplomatic force in the present day - look at the 2024 Beijing Declaration.

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 51 points 2 weeks ago

Racist fuckers pretty much asking the Chinese to risk death and nuclear WWIII while they are too incompetent to do fuck all in their own countries (^most lenient scenario. actual scenario - they partake in the benefits of imperialism).

So kind of like this

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 65 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I have plenty of criticism when it comes to China's foreign policy, but BadEmpanada is the last person I'd want to hear it from.

Any valid criticism he may have is completely tarnished by him routinely spreading flat out misinformation on China using US state department talking points like the "Uyghur genocide".

I don't understand how any self-respecting communist and anti-imperialist can still take this guy seriously.

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 59 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe he figures if he posts hard enough, China will give up on the plans it puts into place years in advance and rapidly shift gears into an adventurist world liberation military campaign.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

More like 'Westerners when you ask them to do anything'.

Servility in the imperial core is very special. We express it by complaining loudly until someone takes notice, and if they don't, it's their fault for not hearing us. Learned helplessness from centuries of liberalism.

Complaining on the internet about a country that does not even speak your language will not shame them into acting the way you want them to. All it will do is create more anti-communists and give arguments for color revolution. Of which 3 attempts have been made in China in just the past 8 years, and more are brewing.

Like most of his audience is statistically Statesians. He should be telling them ways of organizing shipments for Cuba instead of trying to get a dunk in for the twitter likes. There are routinely convoys that organize shipments to Cuba, mostly food medication and basic goods. Did he post about them? I did.

People like him do this very deliberately. Their hatred of AES outdoes their irritation at US imperialism. I mean what else do you call it when you have all these accounts posting endlessly about China trying to influence public opinion? They never mention that 38% of Cuba's daytime electricity is produced by Chinese-provided solar farms, for example. They want China to do everything everywhere all at once when that is precisely a factor that led to the dismantling of the soviet union.

Some of them are even the same people that will say Cuba was a 'sugar colony' of the USSR.

Beware: going down this path of always finding fault within things you can't act upon will only lead you to ultra-leftism. He's the living proof.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well said, I think we really ought to evaluate our own excuses for inaction before looking to the other hemisphere.

To me Empanada's opinion is one that follows the "President Xi, fire when ready" meme.

And I'm not criticizing the meme, but there seems to be this trend amongst us in the western "left" to expect China to swoop in and take care of all our problems in a style akin only to the nostalgic "memories" we've developed of the Soviets.

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I’m not criticizing the meme, but there seems to be this trend amongst us in the western “left” to expect China to swoop in and take care of all our problems in a style akin only to the nostalgic “memories” we’ve developed of the Soviets.

This is an interesting point because the key here is the USSR doesn't exist anymore. And for quite a few of us in these spaces, it probably never existed while we were alive (or not while we were cogent adult beings). The USSR as a world savior simply never existed. As impact beyond itself goes, the USSR made a huge difference in defeating Nazi Germany and being the first to establish a socialist state project, but it also took massive losses in the process of fighting Nazi Germany and was stretched thin from that and its international efforts. Meanwhile, the US was positioned really well after WWII to steamroll over the planet, utilizing pre-existing colonial and imperial tendrils to make it all the easier to do so.

In other words, what I'm trying to say is that although the USSR did great things for people, it was still heavily limited by its material conditions. And if it was still around today, it would be getting criticized by ultra-leftists in similar ways to how China is criticized now. Because it wouldn't be making all of the most plainly "moral" decisions, it would not be saving the world but instead acting in a complex way that tries to move the international and local cause of liberation forward, and the western empire propaganda machine would be telling people from day one to despise everything it stands for.

Here the Christian culture that Jones Manoel talks of rears its head again. Now that the USSR is no more, we can freely romanticize what it was, in a form unmarred by complex and uncomfortable realities. We can wallow in the comfort of the idea untouched and untainted by good will having to work within circumstances full of cruelty and neglect. It's reassuring in a way to hide in the purity of the idea, if one believes that acting within a cruel world, rather than rejecting it with the most swift and bridge-burning measures, has an inevitable corrupting influence that destroys otherwise good efforts or damns one (if not the whole world) to depravity.

Likewise with praise of China. It is dangerous (to their comfort) for the purist to sincerely learn about China in detail because the ideal will be shattered in favor of the material realities. The Christian-influenced conclusion will lead to the belief that it has been "corrupted". It is then knocked down from the pedestal that it never asked to be on, where it can be spat upon like a fallen angel who seeks to lead lost souls astray.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The USSR has made a number of mistakes in foreign policy:

  • wanting to apply their own methods of revolution to China rigidly (both in organization and warfare),
  • urging China to wait for a more opportune moment for revolution,
  • urging the same of DPRK,
  • overly funding communist parties to the point they had no reason to try and find other avenues of funding. When funds stopped, all of these parties almost died and most of them turned eurocommunist to retain dues and membership.
  • pushing of a soviet theoretical line, which had the effect of teaching only one method of revolution/marxist thought.
  • getting pulled into "proxy" conflicts (I don't really like the implications of 'proxy' but I digress), which opened the way for color revolutions to take hold.

As the first successful socialist experiment we could argue, and I do argue that, that it's not like there was a lot of textbooks to pull from. They applied what they knew that worked and everything else was still to be determined, and they did a lot of things right too. Furthermore I also think the world situation around that time was very different; Asia was freeing itself following the defeat of Japan in ww2, there were a number of socialist revolutions all around the same time in the 50s, then in the 60s Africa struggled for independence.

And yet we see that all of this was not enough to defeat the imperial hegemony, so what went wrong? And why repeat the mistakes of the past? We see that it wasn't always correct to 'just' follow the USSR. These mistakes are not entirely the USSR's fault, they're just dialectical. They exist in contradiction and as one element grows the other grows as well. And likewise not everything was of their own making, they were after all constantly under siege from the United States.

Probably nobody thought the USSR would ever be able to be dismantled. And yet it was, and it wreaked havoc in the soviet republics, the DPRK, Cuba. If the PRC were ever to fall, what would remain of world socialism? Are we today in a situation where it would not lead to the post-1991 periods other countries saw? I think so yes, because the PRC has picked a different direction from the USSR in that regard, but I'm presenting the question.

And yet with these mistakes, so to speak, I still support the USSR and would never speak ill of it publicly. My criticisms of their policies are to notice the pothole and mark it clearly so people coming after me can avoid it. Capitalism itself was not established overnight; it took decades of struggle and centuries overall to reach the level it has. Even today there are some countries that have retained their royal family after compromise with the feudal lords.

People like empanada are "neither washington nor beijing" today (he has called China imperialist and 'communist in name only') and would have been "neither washington nor moscow" back in the 60s no matter what they might say they think of the USSR today with hindsight. But where do these words lead new comrades? Imagine just starting to read Marx and your group tells you there is no such thing as a socialist country today and everything sucks, what are you even struggling for at that point? To be right? To flex? To teach newcomers that communism has been thoroughly defeated in the 90s, and we have reached the end of history?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] puppygirlpets@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like most of his audience is statistically Statesians. He should be telling them ways of organizing shipments for Cuba instead of trying to get a dunk in for the twitter likes. There are routinely convoys that organize shipments to Cuba, mostly food medication and basic goods. Did he post about them? I did.

not to defend the annoying prick but he did in fact do exactly that in a recent video

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago

that's good of him at least!

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 46 points 2 weeks ago

BadEmpanada wants China to intervene because he wants to stop a genocide.

Posadists want China to intervene because we want nuclear war.

we-are-not-the-same We are not the same.

[–] ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 2 weeks ago

I remember like 2 yrs ago I was telling people on Deprogram subreddit “hey this guy is an abrasive asshole that only gives hot takes for views” and like 80% of them were like “lmk when you admit you’re a Zionist” or like “stfu, he’s done more for the global left than you”. Fine. Nowadays it’s obvious that he’s at least a lil transphobic (that tweet about trans people using their gender identity as an excuse?? for not having their political takes be criticized, it didn’t make sense so I don’t know how to even word it, my bad) and admitted himself that he isn’t a Marxist/communist. Fuck Israel and the USA, but seriously we can’t act like everyone who comes to those 2 VERY OBVIOUS leftist conclusions is a good person or even a smart person. The day I don’t have to hear about Bad Empanada again will be a very welcome one, can’t wait until his ass shuts up. Not to mention that he doxxed or helped to Doxx BayArea415, a great fount of info on PRC history and politics, as well as DPRK stuff

[–] NikkiB@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago (27 children)

You ask these people what they’re doing to fight Zionism and they’ll just insist that they’re posting and fighting in the information war, meanwhile this is what they post.

It’s just incredible how western leftists will expect real revolutionaries and real leaders of real communist societies to imperil their many hundreds of millions of citizens and their thriving socialist projects to clean up messes borne of our own sins. Yes, Palestinian genocide is evil and it must be stopped, but how is that China’s burden to bear? As if we haven’t foisted enough burdens directly onto them already…

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Богданова@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago

He should read: Left-Wing childishness and petty-bourgeoise mentality.

This is precisely the case with our “Left Communists”, who in words (and of course in their deepest convictions) are merciless enemies of the petty bourgeoisie, while in deeds they help only the petty bourgeoisie, serve only this section of the population and express only its point of view by fighting—in April 1918!!—against . . . “state capitalism”. They are wide of the mark!

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some really impressive and well written takes in this post, I'm really happy to see the engagement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I mean, yeah, they do kinda do that.

[–] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (53 children)

Not really. They are not exactly relaxing when it comes to western imperialism and opposing it.

There just is not exactly much to do against it if they don't want to jeopardise their own people, their goal of a multipolar world and the idea of socialism in the world.

We are talking about nuclear powers and china is not that well liked yet in the west. They also don't want to make it seem like they are behind the Palestinian struggle and therefore give an excuse for the genocide because the evil and powerful CCP is behind it and not normal people that wanted to live in peace and are violently resisting due to being attacked.

To paint china as simply relaxing on this issue is a huge insult imo and we should trust our comrades conducting one of the most successful socialist experiments a little bit more. Especially when we consider that the USSR might have spread itself a bit thin by helping around the globe before securing themselves

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They do but BE is doing that annoying idealist shit Lenin, Parenti, et al have roasted where nothing China does is ever good enough for Leftists because they're not a super wholesome big chungus perfect real communist society in our time that has no flaws and is a utopia for everyone.

He could be calling out the countries actually backing the genocide but he's choosing to attack China instead. Like, really? Priorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Yeah I feel like, BE's takes on China are pretty shit on the regular but honestly I would be lying if I said I didn't feel like this sometimes. Most leftists on this site have agreed at one point or another that China's international policies have a history of being.... Not the best, but the second you criticize the lack of any real support for Palestine, all of a sudden you get a 10 pages essay about why their strategy of inaction is 10D chess and how they have to keep doing business with Israel and having their politicians literally praise trade deals with them in order to somehow eventually prevent the single last Palestinian child from being murdered.

Like we get it, they can't really do shit because the west, and none of us is ready to die in nuclear hellfire. It's the simple truth, but damn if they don't make it come off like they really just don't give a single shit about stopping it.

As bleak as it is, in my personal opinion, Palestine is doomed. The world will fail to do anything till it's too late for them. The only powers that CAN stop it, have all but blatantly admitted they won't. I know this will piss a lot of people off, and we should all still support them to the last, but I just don't see this genocide being stopped in time.

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

but the second you criticize the lack of any real support for Palestine, all of a sudden you get a 10 pages essay about why their strategy of inaction is 10D chess and how they have to keep doing business with Israel and having their politicians literally praise trade deals with them in order to somehow eventually prevent the single last Palestinian child from being murdered.

This is just bad faith nonsense. People have really got to stop believing negative stuff they read about an AES project just because it aligns with what they already suppose is happening.

I can't seem to find it in my bookmarks at the moment so maybe I didn't bookmark it, but there was a thing just recently about a company that was having problems because of China having blocked new investments in israel and marked it as high risk since 2023. I could not figure out from that one story whether the blocking new investments part was recent or if that was also since 2023, but this is part of the problem. Most sources English-speaking people will come across about China organically are not sources coming directly from China about what China is doing.

I use this as an example because it demonstrates how it already isn't as simple as "they are doing business with israel as normal".

Another recent example, about Venezuela, was some people falling for an imperialist headline that claimed Venezuela was sending oil to israel and they took this as evidence of Delcy Rodriguez being a sellout. But official Venezuelan sourcing corrected this claim.

As for the stuff about "10D chess", I can only assume you're referring to analyses that delve into the situation China found itself in after the USSR got destroyed and why it has taken the path it has. It's not 10D chess, it's dialectical and historical materialism, which can probably sound convoluted sometimes, but that's because 1) taking on a hegemonic global capitalist empire is complicated and 2) we're largely trying to explain it from the outside in without having grown up in the Chinese context and being privy to how it all went down.

You're welcome to challenge the analyses and do your own, but dismissing it as 10 page essays of excuses is not helping anyone. It's pretty low effort to fling shit at people who are trying to understand the world and shout some moralist proclamations. It takes more effort to contribute to that understanding, but more importantly, it can require real sacrifice to take moral stands that have consequences for doing so that can result in a painful end.

And if the people of Palestine can be steadfast throughout the decades of torture and genocide they've faced, what is your excuse for proclaiming them doomed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The burden for China to have to do something against the wests genocide when they have nothing to do with Palestine, even historically is weird. Despite that the diplomatic perspective of China has always been one of contesting the Golan heights, supporting North Korea and historic support of the PLO when it was a marxist entity.

To say they are not anti-colonial is wrong, they are also pro-trade and diplomancy - im not going to get mad at them for mirroring what the US does which is just bomb them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›