Canadians love Cuba from my experience.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
I'm interested to hear what they come up with!
11th province, baby! Trump already hates us both - let’s team up! How nice would it be to have year-round beaches in Canada? Plus, they already have healthcare.
(Joking, obviously)
Someone getting in the way of trump inflicting generalized misery will not go over well. It’s the last joy he has!
excuse me I was told we were a vassal state
I mean this is the exception that proves the rule more than anything given that Canada hadn't done anything about the embargo in the 87 years since its imposition.
And what about the Iraq war, and abortion, and universal healthcare, and legalized weed, are they also exceptions that prove the rule? Where are the regularities that prove the rule?
How Canada treats its own citizens is irrelevant to its relationship with America, so of these only the Iraq war is relevant, and... uh... yeah.
Where are the regularities that prove the rule?
Good thing you asked. Off the top of my head: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_in_the_War_in_Afghanistan, https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/sanctions/iran.aspx?lang=eng, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada%E2%80%93Israel_relations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi-led_intervention_in_the_Yemeni_civil_war (CTRL+F Canada). And that's before we get into Carney's string of capitulations since his election. If anything can you name three instances of US regime change that Canada meaningfully opposed? Any instance of Canada following a foreign policy counter to US interests?
How Canada treats its own citizens is irrelevant to its relationship with America
Really? You don't think America cares that Canada is a big shining example right on their border that fully legalized abortion and universal healthcare works perfectly fine?
Good thing you asked. Off the top of my head:
Could you be a bit more specific than linking the entire wikipedia article on "Canada in the war in Afghanistan" and then saying "ctrl f Canada"?
If anything can you name three instances of US regime change that Canada meaningfully opposed?
All of them? Unless by "meaningfully" you mean "militarily" or "economically", and then my next question would be... how?
Any instance of Canada following a foreign policy counter to US interests?
Right now, we're making deals with China in response to their tariffs.
Are you sure it isn't just Russian and Chinese propaganda that has led you to believe that any nation who doesn't automatically take their side on every issue is somehow an "American vassal state"?
You don't think America cares that Canada is a big shining example right on their border that fully legalized abortion and universal healthcare works perfectly fine?
Evidently they (as in the ruling elites) don't. Got any examples (that aren't MAGA, those guys are an anomaly) of that not being the case? Either way Europe tends to be brought up as an example more than Canada regarding these things, so Canada's absence wouldn't really change much.
Could you be a bit more specific than linking the entire wikipedia article on "Canada in the war in Afghanistan" and then saying "ctrl f Canada"?
Oh no, I'm asking you to read/skim the first three articles and CTRL+F Canada in the fourth article because unfortunately there's no "Canadian participation in the Saudi-led intervention in the Yemeni civil war" article. Here we have Canada participating in four (five counting the Iraq war) American foreign escapades literally on the opposite side of the world that are only relevant to it because of America. I could go on about how Canada participates in America's weaponization of international recognition and acts as an extension of American soft power, or about how Canadian capital is even more subservient to America than the Canadian state due to its vulnerability to secondary sanctions, but I believe I've made my point; this is pretty much the 21st century equivalent of a vassal state sending troops when its masters go to war.
All of them? Unless by "meaningfully" you mean "militarily" or "economically", and then my next question would be... how?
I mean as I learned just now Canada has been remarkably independent in its stance towards Cuba even before the current crisis, so clearly it's possible, but also: Militarily is obviously a no-go (vassal state moment*), but economically and diplomatically is very much possible. One reason getting on America's bad side is so bad for third world countries is that "allies" like Canada immediately follow suit, cutting off diplomatic recognition and trade. There's nothing forcing Canada to sanction Iran or recognize American-installed governments in the third world (thinking of Yemen, but there are others), and the Canadian list of foreign terrorist organizations doesn't have to just be a list of non-state entities America doesn't like. And just to anticipate likely responses:
"We have to so America doesn't get mad at us" -> um yeah that's what a vassal state is.
"These decisions are based on human rights" -> y'all sell weapons to Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE; human rights have nothing to do with this.
*The fact that Canada couldn't plausibly participate in a proxy war on the opposite side of America is just more evidence of its subservience to American interests.
Right now, we're making deals with China in response to their tariffs.
While tariffing Chinese EVs (and only Chinese EVs) ostensibly to protect Canada's nonexistent EV industry. While Canada has become marginally more independent in this respect, its actions are for the most part still party line despite the violations of and direct threats to its sovereignty.
Are you sure it isn't just Russian and Chinese propaganda that has led you to believe that any nation who doesn't automatically take their side on every issue is somehow an "American vassal state"?
Nope, I also hate Russia and China, but automatically taking the US's side on almost every issue is a sign of being a vassal state.