this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4174 readers
853 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This rapid deterioration of Medicare’s financial solvency represents a stark drop from the CBO’s previous estimate, which was published just last year, in March 2025. The dramatically shortened timeline means future retirees could face significant cuts to vital health care services far sooner than previously anticipated. As required by the Deficit Control Act, CBO Director Phillip Swagel noted the projections reflect the assumption benefits would be paid as scheduled even after the HI trust fund was exhausted.

The primary culprit for this accelerated depletion is a sharp reduction in the fund’s projected income, heavily driven by legislation passed over the last year. Specifically, the 2025 reconciliation act (Public Law 119-21, more commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) significantly reduced the revenues the trust fund normally receives from taxing Social Security benefits. This legislation lowered tax rates and established a temporary deduction for taxpayers age 65 or older. Consequently, this major policy shift enacted during the Trump administration has directly contributed to starving the Medicare safety net of critical future funding.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Taxing SS benefits seems like a bad idea. Maybe there are a few people out there that aren’t being taxed enough that could help fund it again?

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

No “maybe” about it, the time for soft language is long past. Billionaires need to be taxed to the hilt to pay for the aggregate needs of the populace and national infrastructure. They don’t pay their share and they leverage their wealth to continually increase their wealth and influence while not contributing to the commonwealth.

There’s no reason for these people to have more money than god, and we’ve seen them have exponentially disproportionate power and levels of influence in politics and life in general, influencing all aspects of society as their levels of wealth have dramatically increased over the last decade and change.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, taxing retirement pay to pay for retirement Healthcare sounds a little circuitous.

Not good that they didn't identify a way to replace that funding when changing things (as is the republican way), but can understand the argument of not taxing Social Security.