this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1229 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4146 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] razen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How will they be able tackle the play integrity checks and all those things?

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I remember my original Moto G. It was a good phone for the time. I will follow Graphene wherever they go until a Linux phone is ready.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Hello Moto!

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

This is crazy big news.

[–] HaustierElch@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

Very interesting, I'll keep an eye on Motorola phones. Not that I need a new one anytime soon, but still that's the kind of thing that could be refreshing to read news about.

[–] usernameusername@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 hours ago

W Moto ❤️‍🩹

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Let's see if it gets released before GrapheneOS and unlockable bootloader get outlawed

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point, right? Google is trying to lock down Android even more, and third party vendors can see the increasing risk. If they fork now, they can maybe undercut the increasing monopoly efforts.

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 8 points 5 hours ago

I am sure they are also seeing a growing demand for more privacy, the only reason own a pixel is because of GrapheneOS. If I could buy a phone with the OS pre installed I would, don't know if they are going to do that. Also, by patterning with GrapheneOS they don't has the development cost and they can trade on Graphenes name

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago

OEM, they can lock the bootloader. So at least there's that

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What's the likelihood that Motorola will eventually lock down GrapheneOS though? Imho it'd be a bad move if they did. The FOSS mobile OS community has matured to the point that we don't need to rely on for-profit monoliths any more. Motorola would be smart to lead the way to where the mobile device economy will be.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 6 points 2 hours ago

matured to the point that we don't need to rely on for-profit monoliths any more

Which phones are we using for Graphene OS at the moment? Ah, yeah… Google… well known for its non-profit behaviour… I say: Give me alternatives which we aren't to try to get rid of in the first place.

[–] j2k4@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

Jesus dude let them get compatibility before you bring out the assumptions.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I always thought Pixel was the platform to have for fucking around with the OS and stuff. Of fucking course I was an idiot.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Don't be too hard on yourself, they definitely put money and effort into influencing opinions in all the subversive ways they can manage. But also, let this be a lesson to always check alternatives and their reason for existing. I consider it part of best practices.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

"Embrace, Extend, Extinguish". When have they ever done otherwise.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Point of order: That was Microsoft rather than Google.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I'm aware that Microsoft coined that phrase, but Google seems to be doing something quite similar.

Google embraced the creation of an open-sourced Android project, extended its capabilities with centralized software distribution, and is now extinguishing by forcing developers to comply with its new requirements and banning third-party app stores.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 29 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

My biggest concern is the life cycle of the device. I almost went with Motorola for my last phone, but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates. Is that likely to be better on GrapheneOS? If so, that is a huge win imo. If not, it still isn't ideal because I don't want to have to buy a new phone every 2 years...

[–] Willdrick@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Thats the trick, when a company supports romming, you can extend the support for however long you want!

[–] huggingstars@programming.dev 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

GrapheneOS was claiming 5-year support IIRC. Apple level support is infeasible. Not sure how affordable longer firmware support from Qualcomm is.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 43 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Well, fuck. I really hoped they would pick FairPhone. Motorola is... Okay. I guess they made the Nexus 5 ; which was one of the best phones ever.

I hope they make a SMALL one, I am so tired of this GIGANTIC pixel 9.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 39 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fairphone isn’t available everywhere while Motorola is. It’s pretty easy to understand why they chose them.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's not the reason, the real reason is Fairphone doesn't take security seriously. The GrapheneOS devs have called them out numerous times on that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›