this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
113 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
3205 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

There's a Lovecraft story about this exact thing. It doesn't end well.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

So Octarine, basically.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 63 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh, a new color dropped before GTA 6??

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

It's GTA 6 the new HL 3?

[–] majiks@lemm.ee 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Intertesting research, but it is not a colour. It is a human's visual sensation created by giving the brain unusual inputs. If you take the same light and measure it spectrum, it is not new.

[–] ianonavy@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago

Color is mostly a biological sensation. In low light, humans lose color acuity because rods are activated more than cones. Objects reflect the same wavelengths, but our cones can’t activate due to low energy. Does this mean color fades in low light? It depends on the physiology of the perceiver.

Humans have three color receptors peak-sensitive to red, green, and blue. Dogs have only two: yellow and blue. This means they can’t distinguish certain wavelengths. To dogs and colorblind humans, red and green look the same because their receptors are activated similarly. Color isn’t just a property of light; it’s a biological perceptual experience.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You say that, but Magenta is similar. It's a unique reaction in our perception to two different wavelengths of light combining. Magenta is not in the rainbow.

[–] majiks@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

The whole point was that there is physical combination of wavelengths that induces pink sensation but there is none for this new olo, this is why i think it is not a property of light but purely a human sensation.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Ok but it's a new experience that no one has had before. The only reason why the set of electromagnetic wavelengths is special is because it's part of the human experience. So seeing something outside of that normal perception is arguably seeing a new color.

[–] wkk@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Did you know we only experience pink as our red and blue cell receptors being stimulated at the same time? There is no pink wavelength.

[–] majiks@lemm.ee 0 points 1 hour ago

The whole point was that there is physical combination of wavelengths that induces pink sensation but there is none for this new olo, this is why i think it is not a property of light but purely a human sensation.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Captain Obvious would like to chime in: (sorry 😅)

Every color that we see is created by different types of receptors being stimulated together. A linear combination of three of these types. Arguably there isn't really a wavelength that only stimulates one type of receptor exclusively as their absorbtion areas overlap - so it isn't even that precise to call one receptor the "green" receptor as it sees a continuum of wavelength (of which a lot are also detected by the (so-called) "red" receptor.

It's a little egg-and-hen-problem with the naming here.a way out of it would be to only speak about spectra if it's in the physical realm and color of its in the percetral realm.

[–] wkk@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I saw the following meme the other day on that topic which I found amazing:

shrimps have more cones because they're dumb

On the other hand I hope my point was clear about pink being perceived as a color when it doesn't exist as a singular wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum: something the person I was responding to was seemingly arguing that it then invalidates what we might call a "color". By his logic "pink" shouldn't be considered a color, which I disagree with!

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I wonder if it's quite like anti-red

Stare at the center of a bright red circle for like 30 seconds,

Then look away at a white surface.

It looks like what those people in the article describe, especially in the "holy shit I've never seen that before" feeling.

[–] aubertlone@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago

Wow quite a super interesting read.

The doors of perception can be opened to many different avenues.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if this will be more available in my lifetime.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Valve not releasing HL3, I was half asleep and I suck please ignore

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Happens to the best of us.

[–] Quintus@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

I'm so jealous.