FooBarrington

Can you link what you're talking about? Because I'm not aware of any animation system that's purely mathematically derived AND that can generate aesthetically pleasing animations for arbitrary body shapes.

There are certain techniques like Inverse Kinematics that might vaguely fit your description, but that's a tiny piece of the puzzle - it might get you 5-10% of the way, but given arbitrary body shapes it's gonna look horrible in most cases, and it doesn't give you actual animations since you'd still need to purposefully move the creature's extremities.

Could you expand on some of these challenges? We haven't had these issues in any companies I've worked at, but those were mostly on the smaller side.

As a passionate Golang hater, I can gladly explain!

• It's not just the repeated if err != nil, even though that's already bad enough. But the really fucked up part is the := bullshit. It makes moving code around unnecessarily annoying, and it's telling that few other languages share Golang's approach.
• The lowercase/uppercase rules for private/public stuff is theoretically not a horrible idea, but it makes the code look much more inconsistent. I find _ much easier to read, and this leaves upper/lower to signal other details. But I see that this is mostly personal preference.
• Fairly basic operations take much, much more code than they should (e.g. deserializing JSON while handling extra args, or basic functional operations - though that should change sooner rather than later with the new generic methods, right?)
• The decision to initialize every non-pointer primitive with the "bottom value" (or whatever it's called again) makes sense in isolation, but it's really unfortunate that they don't support additive types, because this means a bunch of common tasks need to use pointers, and unfortunately the type system is worthless when it comes to preventing segfaults caused by bugs with pointers.
• I find that most Go libraries have basically no documentation, if you're lucky you get an example that might vaguely be related to whatever you want to know. I've had much better experiences in other languages.

All in all IMO most Go code is 5x longer than necessary to actually express itself in a readable manner, all because the language still doesn't have proper error handling or generic support (until recently at least). At the same time it's fairly inflexible, the type system is still shallow and basic, and it's still way too easy to shoot yourself in the foot.

The only good thing Go has going is the single file deployments, but I'll gladly spend one hour of every remaining day of my life setting up containers, if it means I never have to touch anything Go again.

I love the movement etc. in Prototype 2! 100%ed it more than once, it's just too fun. Surely we'll get the sequel any day now 🥲

A lion does not concern himself with the opinions of sheep.

So please don't be mean, sheep, or the lion will start crying.

Weird question to ask through radio, over.

But that would drastically change the message, no? People should choose to leave the Matrix because the reward is living in reality, even if it's harder and there's no other reward.

Hm, I think it does make the message stronger. If a single event (development of sentient machines) leads to our downfall, it's easy to shrug it off as "bad luck", because who could have foreseen it back then?

But if we had multiple chances to correct course and we kept fucking up, it removes any doubt that it's a human flaw, which means "humanity must reflect and change, or this is the inevitable conclusion".

AI could be useful if it could orchestrate more complex tasks that the relevant apps don't natively support. But of course that's not what we're getting.

I use lots and lots of timers every day to structure my chores and work. For example, I'd sometimes love to be able to start one timer, and have another one set to automatically start as soon as I stop the ringing from the first (which might take a few minutes).

Very simple requirements, but specialized enough that I'd have to write it myself. But I can't see phone AIs supporting something like this in this decade.

That's good! But I'd still prefer if I and the other 44% could at least say "please stop producing and sending us trash".

They should really make mailed advertisements opt-in, but of course the industry won't do that. And this what makes it cancerous IMO: they never give up trying to inject ads into people's lives.

OTOH, it seems like ~44% of junk mail gets thrown away without ever being opened: https://zerojunkmail.org/environmental-impact

That's a bunch of environmental destruction and personal annoyances caused, so the label "cancer" seems fair to me.

Yes, it's pretty common knowledge that this is how many fashion trends were set. Unless you're educated in the field and know that pop sci is wrong on this, there are less condescending ways to ask this.