FooBarrington

No, that's not true. All current models use output from previous models as part of their training data. You can't solely rely on it, but that's not strictly necessary.

It missed the final sentence

I think I can help you with that 😏 though I can't get much airtime, sorry.

I mean, if you insist...

The information you use is only related to the last object the light interacted with, not the light itself (with the small exception being the “brightness” - that has nothing to do with the object).

This is obviously false, otherwise all objects would look the same under any color of light - yet they don't. This example actually shows that it is only the light itself that matters, because it has the information of the objects it interacted with during its lifetime!

No one claims to hear the air in their ears rather than the violin that is being played nearby. That’s just not what the word “hear” means.

But everyone would agree that we're hearing the sound waves produced by the violin. Again, a great example counter to your point, as the equivalent to a sound wave is the photon.

Ah yes, that's famously why screens literally build tiny versions of the world inside them. We don't see the light, we see the objects!

Ah, then it goes through a server, since it synchronizes the information. In that case a subscription makes sense, but I don't need that, so hopefully there's something cheaper.

Thanks, will do! Since you have stuff assigned to multiple names, I'm assuming you use a cloud integration, right?

Yeah, but I don't want to pay a subscription fee for something like this, a flat fee should be enough. Someone else mentioned a lifetime subscription for another app costing 30€, but that's again way too expensive.

I'd love to try something like this, but I don't see a reason to pay a subscription, or 30€ or more. Does anyone know a good one that's at most 10€? Don't need cloud.

I'm only making assumptions, but I'd guess that 300nm is the range of frequencies it can amplify. AFAIK fibre cables are used with multiple "channels" by sending data with different frequencies at once. Say your signal range is centered around 850nm, this amplifier could amplify in the range of 700-1000nm.

But I might be totally off, just guessing.

Yes, the first example does the same thing, but there's still less to mentally parse. Ideally you should just use if len(my list) == 0:.