FooBarrington

joined 2 years ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Great initiative. I really feel like people over 60 believe everything they read online - age limits should really help protect them from misinformation.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you think they'll finally announce Silksong?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And some percentage of those 95% should consider trying a real prison, because the frequency of minors being sexualized - even in mainstream animes - is disgusting. Yet some people keep putting that shit in, and some people keep liking it.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Supercalifragilisticmegalopolis?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

With a broken containment field, the reaction will simply stop. Fusion is hard because at small scales everything has to be perfect.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Oh, it's actually 0-click (though a couple dozen key presses)

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The only true man cat is Idris Elba in Cats

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's IMO also so much clearer regarding data types. You can't accidentally write a boolean when you want a string.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't tell that from one text exchange. Yes, it's possible, but it's also possible that they're just trying to motivate their son to try something new.

It's only being controlling if there's a pattern and you acquiesce. We don't know that's the case.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You could maybe describe it that way, but unfortunately that doesn't work in collaborative projects.

But I'd also disagree - if "his ways" require him to regularly and publicly shit on the work of other people & to misrepresent issues others have with him, he's arrogant and a dick.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, if you don't go because someone set it up for you, you're still letting yourself be controlled.

If you go because you want to go, you're not being controlled.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (10 children)

This isn't "being controlled". Yes, the dad should have asked first, but it's just a date for someone who seems to want to go on dates. That's just being helpful in the wrong way.

view more: next ›