this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

10957 readers
734 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I KNEW HE WAS GOING TO BE A PAIN IN THE ASS!

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He's a боль in the ass.

From a stateist perspective with the broadly know state of the Polish army rejecting any source of finance for it is borderline treason. And his sode basically claims the problem is that we have to necesarly buy american equipment. Which they did when in goverment underminding long term programs and getting less for more, so now we have unarmed helicopters and tanks we cant roll through half of the local land features.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do right wingers vote for globalists?

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 1 points 1 month ago

Even if it's a rhetorical question; in this case the official line is about trusted partnership, and problems with strategic dependence on neighbors with problematic history. Dog whistle being "Trump right wing good, Brussels green-gays bad", and that gets political points, gotta oppose whatever the other party supports. In reality pretty sure it's easier to be corrupt in dealings with Trump than with EU (when not well established with EU elites). Or just being Russian pawns and using all this to subvert defensive capabilities and alliances. We got well established precedences in our own history.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and tanks we cant roll through half of the local land features.

The German and American tanks? Wasn't it a conscious decision to have stronger tanks where possible?

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is about Abrams spefically. A lot of oir infrastructure is not adjusted to their size and weight, and they might not be the best option for the local marches, swamps and thick forrests which is all of Polands east (plus some mountines to the south). Its a tank for open plains.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

My interpretation was that they are an insurance against another German attack. It sounds a bit unreasonable but I think it allows them to focus on the east.

[–] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PiSsing all over europes strategy

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

As usual. People have forgotten how much of a pain in the butt Poland can be to deal with for the EU when PiS has a say. This is a first reminder of many and itβ€˜s important to note that poles voted for this.

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

here we go again. Another trouble in paradise..

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

People seem to be confused. This is not Poland blocking EU defense funding. This is Polish president blocking access to EU money for Poland. It's a internal thing affecting only Poland. There's more money in the defense fund and other countries will access it without issues. The 40B was assigned to Poland which was supposed to be the biggest recipient but because of this veto they will most probably receive less. And it's not a gift. EU is borrowing money and lending it to individual countries on preferential terms.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks. I was confused

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 1 week ago

Still pretty bad for the whole of EU with Poland so close to the frontlines.

[–] androidul@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] harcesz@szmer.info 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont think this delays anything outside of Poland. Also;

Tusk previously vowed that in the event of a presidential veto, he would implement a "Plan B" to make use of the European funds regardless of the president. On Thursday, he called an extraordinary cabinet meeting on Friday at 9:00 am (0800 GMT) in response to the veto.

[–] Pip@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] harcesz@szmer.info 1 points 1 month ago

A the same time his party disbanded the anti-corruption agency, which was dodgy, but the optics aint exactly good...

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 month ago

Cut the money tap, Poland gets "gifted" ~4% net of its annual budget every year since accession. That sounds like the dependency that this POSPiS gentleman so fears.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aaand Poland starts to throw tantrums again. Time to cut their funding.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 1 month ago

What? This is Poland making it more difficult for Poland to access preferential loans for defense from EU. This in any way affect EU or any other country. It can actually mean more money for other countries. Why would EU cut their funding over this?