this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
9 points (63.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

5079 readers
357 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely unnecessary, why is his stance becoming weaker after being mayor? Standing up against Zionism unapologetically was hugely beneficial for him during the primary, going on the defensive makes no sense

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Legitimately a betrayal of his own wife, how do people think he’ll stand with them when he can’t even stand with the one person who he should stand with unconditionally.

“I’m running the largest city in the country, and you’re asking me about a tweet. Not even one that I made, nor my wife, but some third party. You are pathetic and petty people, let’s focus on helping New Yorkers.”

It’s all it would have taken.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is there a full clip or article? Tried looking myselfz everything I'm finding is saying Mamdani is "pro hamas"

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Reading the article; it looks like he was trying to say he disagreed with antisemitism more than denounce support for Palestine. The article presents it such that his wife was trying to cope with the attacks on Palestine and liked posts that others deemed antisemitic. From what ive seen I dont feel they are antiemetic, but if Mamdani wants to heir on the side of caution regarding this administration threatening to imprison anyone who is an "antisemite" (theyre word for anti-zionist) I can see why he would say what he said.

then again, I could be completely missing crucial context because I have not seen the full press release, nor the art made, nor most of the social media posts.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Who deemed it antisemitic, the ADL? Are you actually falling for this in 2026?

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The people who saw the post and artwork deemed it antisemitic. I can not and will not cast a judgment call unless I see it for myself. The article you linked does not contain either of them.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

She called Israelis parasites

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

rama is amazing and the entire issue is just a smear from ny post; shameful of zohran for this and for throwing trans kids under the bus

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 7 months ago

Did we watch the same clip?
Making a commission for someone you don't know doesn't mean you support the commissioner. I can be commissioned to draw big tiddies on all of Zohran’s footage appearances, that doesn't mean I approve of Zohran having tiddies. That's the commissioner’s job to answer, not mines.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 months ago

Ziohran Obamandani strikes again