this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
680 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83094 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What's the play here? Something isn't making sense.

With the Trump administration, the only thing you can be sure of is that the stated reason isn't the real reason. Somebody's got to be getting a payday from this.

[–] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Starlink devices are currently the only approved ones.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago

It’s a money grab. About the only networking companies that build in the us are like Cisco and juniper. Which odds are, you aren’t running at home. This is without a doubt a money grab. Google and Amazon will gladly pay the exemption fee. Some others will as well. This isn’t about security or “pay American”. It’s a money grab.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Same play as always. Bullies countries and corps to get what he wants. As long as it serves him that's all he cares about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tarambor@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The only slight problem with this is that there are no routers made in the USA.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Well, you can run your own router on your own hardware but other than that, agreed.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that hardware also made in the US ><

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My point was mostly that the concept of a router can be executed by any computer with more than one NIC.

Trump isn’t disallowing computers from outside the US, surely, only stuff that looks like routers. They’ll have a hard time defining what a router is.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I wonder how the dumbasses licking his boots will feel about brands like Qotom/etc making high interface mini pcs- whether they consider them "routers" under this. I hope we don't have to go back to what I did 10 years ago- cheap intel desktops with 3-4 nics.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The next step is government approved routers with NSA backdoors.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 155 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just to spell out what many comments already hint at:

There are no US-made routers. "Made" here refers to companies, not where the stuff is actually made. Even if the plastic housing happened to be made in the US for one or two products, the components are still from far away.

Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

This is corruption pure and simple.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And also I'm SURE there will be no backdoors installed in these routers. This was a mutual deal to control information, not just a financial one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Could not be happier to have a UDM pro right now.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 102 points 3 days ago

The rent for your ISP provided hardware is about to go up by x10. Also you will get a letter saying you don't have an approved router installed.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 96 points 3 days ago (6 children)

So consumer grade routers are a security risk, but not ISP switches or server routers? That's the opposite of what a state level actor would look for.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 48 points 3 days ago

Brother it is class war so

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Cisco is made in China. Ubiquiti, Vietnam or Thailand I think.

How is this going to work?

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don't, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

We've seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can install router software on any computer

https://opnsense.org/

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

On Linux you can just turn the kernel into a router with a few commands. Its actually very cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

For anyone looking into this, I recommend picking up a “network appliance” PC. They’re low-spec, often fanless, and come with 4 Ethernet ports. You can often get them for roughly the same price as a router. You will need to provide your own WiFi AP with this method.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 93 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Be ready to get shut out of the global internet and only use Trumpernet.

Seriously though, they'll block yalls internet access in a few years.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Great Firewall of ~~China~~ FREEDOM

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 129 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Are there actually any US-made consumer network routers on the market? All the brands I can think of are pretty much made in Asia these days.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ubiquiti is an American company, not sure if the tech is really MADE here though, seems like that'd be weird considering the components are all made outside the US anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 104 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's incredible how every day in this country continues to be unimaginably dumber than the last.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's really amazing how this country just ran on word and vibes up to this point. Turns out you could just do whatever and nobody would have the cajones to stop you

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

All the thrift stores here throw them away. I've got dozens of them, variety of all types piled up in the closet because why the fuck the not? Fucking knew they'd come after them eventually.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So at what point do they ban all new computers not made domestically?

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 23 points 3 days ago

So at what point do they ban all new computers ~~not made domestically~~?

FTFY. It's the same thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So... all network routers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Something is happening, first the age verification and now this. They're setting up to verify identities online I presume?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

The fascists always attack free speech, and our first amendment rights have been under attack from many directions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

designating all consumer routers manufactured outside the U.S. as a security risk

So this is horseshit, right?

First of all, ALL routers from ANY country are a security risk? Every single other nation is trying to make Spyware for the average American consumer? Doubt.

Second, they are extremely concerned with all consumers' security from foreign actors to the point it needs an outright ban on hardware to protect us. God forbid I buy an AVM router from Germany and open up my home networking to German Spies. What if they find out I sometimes visit porn websites and yourube!?

Third, that the US government, themselves, are trustworthy and wont force backdoors into systems to allow them unfettered access into private networks, something that they HAVE TRIED TO AND SUCCEEDED TO DO IN THE PAST. And also something that they are very clearly opening the door for with all of these legal pushes toward requiring age verification software and OS's. They want to ban foreign routers so that you have to buy routers from companies that they can control. They can ask, coerce and force them to give them access behind the scenes for some bullshit excuse ("protect the kiddies", "law enforcement", "national security", "terrorism"), force them to not tell the public, and then "secretly" monitor every device in the entire country. They are almost certainly already doing this with a significant number of US manufacturers and software developers.

Fuck these fascists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’m so glad they’re focusing on this instead of how shitty and expensive our home internet is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 66 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Great, so zero network products can be sold, and we have to dispose of any existing ones in a couple years.

I guess the US won't have any Internet anymore.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

lmfao. apparently the way this was originally written would have prevented non-exempt routers from getting security updates. you know, the alleged reason this ruling even exists. somebody at the FCC office of engineering and technology must have noticed because they issued a temporary waiver (PDF file).

Applying the revised 47 CFR §§ 2.932(b) and 2.1043(b) to the newly added Covered Routers would have the effect of prohibiting permissive changes to Covered Routers even if they were authorized prior to the March 23, 2026, Covered List addition. This prohibition would be in effect even for Class I permissive changes—such as software and firmware security updates that mitigate harm to U.S. consumers—because previously-authorized Routers are now covered equipment. ............... Therefore, OET concludes that a limited waiver until March 1, 2027, is warranted and in the public interest. March 1, 2027, is convenient because it is the date until which the recent DoW determination excepts certain otherwise Covered Routers. Prior to March 1, 2027, the OET will re-evaluate whether to further extend applicability.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From another article about this topic:

This leads to the question of what exactly the FCC means by consumer-grade routers.

In September 2024, NIST submitted proposals to strengthen the – undeniably modest – IT security of routers (NIST IR 8425A). It states: “Routers forward data packets, most commonly Internet Protocol (IP) packets, between networked systems.”

This encompasses a wide range of devices, from WLAN repeaters to smartphones

So new smartphones are banned too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Land of the free? Freedom just keeps slipping away.....

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think you guy are forgetting Occam Razor… the most likely scenario (least assumptions) here is that some inept appointee from the orange pedo thought this would be a good idea and pushed it with the research, planning and preparation we all put at farting after eating Taco Bell

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Protectionism at its finest! What should the rest of the world make of US consumer routers? All good? No backdoors letting friendly people in?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll stick with my pfsense... Just rebuilt it yesterday to upgrade it a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This is a good time to remind everyone to avoid any of the major manufacturers. Get pre-built OPEN boxes and install OpenWRT. You performance and capabilities will beat the shit out of any of the other stuff anyway.

Sadly, there were a few great foreign-made manufacturers who had great hardware for this. Technically they aren't "network routers" and just blank hardware, so probably don't fall into the idiotic language put forth here.

[–] classic@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

any recommended resources to learn more? Is this a lay person accessible option?

You can still get GL.inet routers even on Amazon as of right now, and they're on sale (for obvious reasons).

There's the OpenWRT One router that is basically just a Banana Pi board.

There's lots. Just search around.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is so stupid that I can barely even think of a nefarious reason to do it.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 53 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's so they can more reliably distribute their own backdoors.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›