this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
999 points (99.3% liked)

World News

46331 readers
3225 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 15 points 1 day ago

Labour in the UK is looking so fucking stupid right now

[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm glad our fuck up in the US is inspiring others to step back from the edge. It's at least a silver lining I can console myself with while everything crumbles around me.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Man the fact that we're at the stage of posting an image with a caption within a frame on a wall within a picture within a comment within a forum is kind of fucking with me just a little bit.

Somebody screencap this whole situation and post it on Mastodon and Bluesky, then take a screenshot of that and post it back here on Lemmy.

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's not very typical.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

🇨🇦🤝🇦🇺

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 130 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This forward progress to the human race is brought to you by the color ORANGE.

We proudly demonstrated to the world the proper direction to go.

Our loss is your gain.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It must be stated that the Labor party here are anything but progressive. They are centre-right by the most recent assessment of their values and support a variety of cunts in toxic industries who fund their campaigns.

The libs (our very right wing major party) ran an exceptionally incompetent campaign, with Dutton as a key soulless idiot who can’t admit to mistakes when it hits him in the face. They had a bit of headwind from the global anti Trump sentiment, but it wasn’t like we were in the same situation like Canada.

Regionally we already ARE the 51st state of the USA, because we provide them with much needed Southern Hemisphere intelligence bases which Australians have no right to visit, and they are our protector against any major military threat in the region.

It’s a minor victory for any progressive minded person, as any mention of action on the climate emergency was stupifyingly absent from the entire campaign.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

It must be stated that the Labor party here are anything but progressive

I'm not sure how any of these things scream right wing:

  • Nine out of 10 GP visits to be bulk-billed
  • A rebate on household and small business power bills of $150
  • First home buyers access to 5 per cent mortgage deposits
  • Cutting a further 20 per cent off all student loans
  • Delivering two "modest" tax cuts on July 1, 2026

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-28/election-2025-key-promises-labor-coalition/104717394

I'm not sure how support for universal healthcare, renewables and the party having a gender quota is 'anything but progressive' but sure, they're centre right if your definition of right wing is anything right of the greens

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Happy to have a bit of a debate over that. You can put them dead centre if that makes you feel better.

They certainly have some positives for the general public, and more so than the $.25 rebate promised by LNP. However, the majority of stuff they offer are stopgaps, instead of fixing the real underlying issues. High power bills aren’t going to go down with one off rebates. First home buyers 5% isn’t fixing the housing supply, or over demand, nor is it a solution to anyone over 40 who still hasn’t been able to buy, because a 5% deposit means you’ll pay for forever and then some. Same with tax cuts. Also Tax Cuts are right wing, though they are usually for the wealthy.

They are still all for really terrible corporate developments, they are still cosy with the coal lobby, they’re just smart enough to not bring a big beautiful lump of coal into parliament anymore. They won’t tax mega corporations fairly, they won’t do anything for the climate emergency, just boost green energy, without any serious international commitments or plans to reduce or go net zero in this term of this new government. None of that anywhere.

They tried one terribly worded referendum which probably blew the Aboriginal community a chance at some form of reconciliation for the next half a century, and there’s no more follow up. They have no solid plan for the housing crisis, just a few hand outs.

It’s not screaming right wing, and I didn’t say it was, and it certainly isn’t Trumpism, and our democracy is bar none one of the best and most secure in the world, but it isn’t progressive or left at all. It is fairly competent centrism, maintaining the status quo for corporate Australia, while minimally appeasing the plebeians, because thank fuck, it could have been so much worse. it is a shameful far cry from what we needed in order to really respond to the situation we’re in on the global timeline.

[–] brgo@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a kiwi, so I only hear about Australia's most significant developments, but even then, some of the claims you're making are wrong.

the majority of stuff they offer are stopgaps, instead of fixing the real underlying issues.

They're probably putting in stopgaps to make it less painful while the fixes to the underlying issues gain steam.

High power bills [...]

This will probably be solved (or stop getting worse) as a side effect of Future Made in Australia investing in the Australian manufacture of renewable energy technologies, as Australian made versions are likely to be cheaper than global competitors (at least in Australia). It's also important to note that rising energy prices is not just an Australian problem, considering NZ's wholesale electricity price has risen >30% despite 80% of our electricity coming from renewables (and doesn't have variable running costs).

[...] housing supply, or over demand, [...]

This will probably be mitigated by the Housing Australia Future Fund as it is set up to be able to spend $500 million per year on housing in perpetuity without any additional funding. This means they could technically "sell" something like 2000 houses a year for free forever. On a more realistic note they could take a $50k loss on 10000 houses per year to help mitigate the housing supply problem.

[..] tax cuts.

It is technically possible to have tax cuts that benefit only those who are not already rolling in it, but those kinds of tax cuts are so uncommon you're likely to see a unicorn before they happen. The tax cuts are probably going to be something like the tax cuts we saw over here where the only ones that benefit are the already very wealthy.

[...] they are still cosy with the coal lobby, [...]

I was under the impression that they were majorly funded by the unions. Considering this winge piece complains about the mining industry paying 5x more in tax than they used to and makes the misleading insinuation that it is paying the majority of Australia's tax share, I'd say that they're probably not funded by the mining lobby. (Values from the Australian Treasury suggest that they're paying <10% of the total tax income)

[...] they won’t do anything for the climate emergency [and they don't have any] plans to reduce or go net zero in this term of this new government.

They appear to have this net zero plan I found on a .gov.au website? I notice it doesn't target net zero within the next 3 years because that's simply impossible. The climate action tracker suggests that Australia is doing better than NZ in terms of climate policy, especially considering our action is considered "highly insufficient."

You make the claim that it isn't progressive, but over here it certainly would be. Either way, we can still celebrate that it isn't Trumpism.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

ty mate, amazing response

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 17 points 1 day ago

The ALP are hardly Whitlam-style socialists, but they’re somewhat more progressive than UK Labour, in that they at least purport to be progressive, rather than banking their capital, rewarding donors and distracting the public with culture wars inherited from the Tories.

Mind you, they do most of that when the Greens hold their feet to the fire. With Labor having a lower house majority, it will depend on the Senate to force them to do the right thing.

[–] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah yes that old chestnut. The ALP isn’t perfect so we shouldn’t vote at all. You do realise that we have to vote here in Australia so vibe based voter suppression techniques don’t really work here. The perfect shouldn’t be the enemy of the good.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Easy tiger. I voted yesterday. Pipe it down a notch.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 107 points 1 day ago

A very nice change of recent trends across the world

[–] caveman8000@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (7 children)

WWIII teams are forming up

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's going to be so weird helping the Germans defeat Nazi America

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Same here (said the American)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Remember that the ultimate enemy are the Sociopathic Oligarchs, and their Corporations. They have nearly unlimited finances, so they have to be resisted in other ways.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Foreign elections being won based on real opposition to Trump and those that style themselves after him. Democrats can do this, but it means they would have to stop trying to make deals with nazis.

Congratulations Australians!

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so good to hear. At least some good is coming out of my country being completely fucking destroyed.

Hell yeah who's next? I need some more good news. Getting a literal ulcer over here...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Majority Labor and Potato lost his seat, blessed be the aussies.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost the exact playbook as in Canada. Except it's a close minority here. But the Maple Maggot, after losing his own seat, has decided to take over another MP's seat in a by-election.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I know the chances are very, very slim, but I'd love to see the people of Battle-River-Crowfoot vote ABC and make that little weiner lose again.

There are so many hilarious opportunities with this by-election.

-91 candidates run and he comes in 91st

-Trudeau also runs there and wins

-He runs, loses, and repeats the process until the Liberals have a majority

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

He runs, loses, and repeats the process until the Liberals have a majority

No repetition necessary. The Liberals are one seat away from a majority.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The riding he's chosen to run in is one of the most conservative in the country. The guy who's stepping down won something like 80% of the vote.

But, the Liberals should run someone who actually lives in that riding and keeps reminding the voters there that Poilievre doesn't live there and doesn't know anything about his new riding. It won't be enough to keep him from winning this time, but there's a chance that over time it will start to matter to voters that their MP doesn't live there and knows nothing about their riding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] opus86@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Well done. The the rest of the world has learned from the Trump catastrophe in the US.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (26 children)

The Canadian cons didn't actually boot Polievre, instead they're giving him an easy to win riding and a brand new seat in parliament so he can stay on. Which probably means he'll stick around and win the next election. I hate it.

Edit: autocorrect

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The good news is that the riding he has to run in is incredibly rural. He's going to hate it.

Poilievre is a city boy. He grew up in the Calgary suburbs. Then he moved to Ottawa to become an MP. The only job he's ever had involving physical exertion is when he was a paperboy as a kid. Now he's going to have to spend some time in his new riding surrounded by farmers. The biggest "city" there has a population under 20k. Everything else is towns, villages and hamlets. Assuming he buys a house in Camrose, if he wants Thai food, he'll have to drive over an hour to get to Edmonton.

Maybe because the conservatives have such an overwhelming majority in Battle River - Crowfoot, they won't care that he's a carpetbagger and he won't have to put much effort in there. But, I think eventually he'll have to spend some time in his riding, and it will be a major culture clash.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Shootingstarrz17@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good!! Some hope for this world is left.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Good for the Australians.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›