this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
204 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

83220 readers
3946 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the time the companies say the layoffs are because AI is doing people jobs, but the reality is that making things that use AI is just a lot more expensive. And enabling employees to use AI more than the free tier is really expensive too. So, they need to cut cost elsewhere to balance it out.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 13 minutes ago

Another company slowly shutting themselves down.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of the human mind.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

Clay Magouyrk (CEO):
Larry, in order to pay for these datacenters we might need to cut up to 20,000 jobs.

Larry Ellison:
Cut 30,000.

Clay Magouyrk:
But Larry, 20,000 would be more than...

Larry Ellison:

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 52 minutes ago

As long as we're going with Gary Oldman:

"Fire everyone."

"What do you mean everyone?"

"EVERYONE!!!"

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

"Zorg, you're a monster."

"........I know."

[–] homes@piefed.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I’m going to watch this movie, right now, but the RiffTrax version

[–] Foni@piefed.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

A really good reference

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Tens of thousands of employees and not one of them knows how to make a good error message

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 40 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I was once told by Oracle engineers that it would take 18-24 months to add a drop down with auto complete to their ticketing system.

They don’t have good engineers because Oracle is a law firm pretending to be a tech company.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Engineer? Definitely not "neer" Oracle.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Not sure the engineers are entirely at fault for how long things take there. I'm guessing they must have some insane review and release processes with significant bottlenecks and it's all because of their structure

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I recall reading an ex oracle engineer say that the code base is basically spaghetti. Not only that, but you basically have to be lucky to get your pr in, as due to said spaghetti, there is a high chance that it will be broken by the pr merged before yours.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

I worked with a guy that used to work at Oracle and he pretty much said the same thing. Essentially if you sneezed anywhere within a 10km radius of Oracles code base (and it didn't matter which product) you ran the risk of it all crashing down. dudes spent more time talking about how to theoretically fix something as opposed to actually fixing it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Which code base? All of them? They have a lot of products.

But of course it could also be all of them

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 1 points 34 minutes ago

Not sure if this is it, but this sounds similar to what I remember: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18442941

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

These guys were blown away when I showed them the same feature in a competitor’s product.

The company I worked for had just been bought by Oracle and we were under a directive to switch to all Oracle software, so I guess they weren’t motivated because there wasn’t extra money in it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Okay, yikes. I didn't think it could be THAT bad, but I guess Oracle never fails to surprise.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

The worst part is that it was all down to our existing system being owned by Salesforce, and Larry Ellison hating the CEO of Salesforce.

We could still use Amazon and Microsoft products but nothing from Saleforce because Uncle Larry was butthurt.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they should consider spinning off Paramount or not buying WB instead firing people.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What, the only parts of the company that actually produce anything of value?

[–] reddfugee@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

Bbbbut, they also sell a payroll & HR system that is somehow even worse than SAP's! The main goal of all their Fusion Cloud junk seems to be producing consulting fees, because it's impossible to get anything to work without them.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

What do AI and toilet paper have in common? I wipe my ass with both.

Fuck AI.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Oracle Employment Numbers Trend (Approximate) 2025: 162,000 2024: 159,000 2023: 164,000 2022: 143,000 2021: 132,000 2020: 135,000 2015: 132,000 2011: 108,000

[–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

And enabling employees to use AI more than the free tier is really expensive too.

The cost is upfront for training the LLM, then they have to sell the end product to us (to recuperate costs, start training the next 500B model, etc.), so giving their employees access to a higher tier of LLM is relatively minimal cost, inference isn't exactly cheap, but I think they could afford to give their employees access to higher models.

But, this is Oracle I guess.