this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
696 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
806 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

You can always tell who does real IT work in these threads lol

[–] clif@lemmy.world 117 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Thank you for posting this. I tend to get a lot of my opensource project info from Lemmy so people who take the time to post it are awesome.

Just updated my home instance. Can confirm that 10.11.7 is available in the Debian repos and the update went perfect. I got a new kernel in the same update : D

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good thing my Jellyfin is behind Wireguard.

Consider doing the same if your usecase permits.

[–] esc@piefed.social 171 points 4 days ago (47 children)

Don't expose jellyfin to the internet is a golden rule.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 112 points 4 days ago (23 children)

Kinda defeats the purpose of a media server built to be used by multiple people

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Use a VPN, it's not ideal but it's secure.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Somehow difficult to install on a TV though.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That’s why you do it at your router or gateway and then set a route for the Jellyfin server through the VPN adapter. That way any device on your network will flow through the tunnel to the Jellyfin server including TVs

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 4 days ago

Which again implies that you have a router that allows you to do so. It's not always the case. For tech enthusiast people that's the case. But not for everyone.

I tried to do the same thing at first, but it was a pain, there were tons of issues.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh yes, the routers and gateways that most people have that are isp provided that may not actually have open VPN or wireguard support.

Those ones?

Also putting a VPN in someone else's house so that all their Network traffic goes through your gateway is pretty damn extreme.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 73 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (26 children)

That’s never made sense to me; why build an authn frontend instead of just clicking your user if the security is just an illusion anyways. “Use a VPN” is fine for a mainframe, but an active project in 2026 should aspire to be better.

Edit: or make note of that on their several pages with reverse proxy configuration.

Examples dating back over six years https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 days ago

I mean I'm sure they'd like to just ship safe code in the first place. But if that's not their expertise and they demonstrate that repeatedly, we gotta take steps ourselves. Secure is obviously best, but I'd rather have insecure Jellyfin behind a VPN than no Jellyfin at all.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It's not this or that. Security comes in layers. So while I would assume that the Jellyfin developers do their best to secure their application, I acknowledge the fact that bugs do exist and that Jellyfin is developed in and for hobbyist contexts, and thus not scrutinised and pentested for vulnerabilities in the way software meant for professional environments would be. Therefore I'll add an extra layer of security by putting it behind a VPN that only whitelisted clients can access. If a vulnerability is detected, I can be sure it hasn't already been exploited to compromise my server because we're all "among friends" there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] catlover@sh.itjust.works 56 points 4 days ago

I forgot that it's April first, and was wondering what catasthropic event had happend in order that it had to be stated in the title that its not a joke

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

please tell me it doesn't expose itself onto public web by default

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (22 children)

Is it standard practice to release the security updates on GitHub?

I am a very amateur self hoster and wouldn't go on the github of projects on my own unless I wanted to read the "read me" for install instructions. I am realizing that I got aware I needed to update my Jellyfin container ASAP only thanks to this post. I would have never checked the GitHub.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 days ago

Is it standard practice to release the security updates on GitHub?

Yes.

And then the maintainers of the package on the package repository you use will release the patch there. Completely standard operation.

I recommend younto read up on package repositories on Linux and package maintainers etc.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Wonder if it's the Axios one. Sounds like it isn't from their description though hmm

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think so, the previous release 10.11.6 is a few months old and the axios supply chain attack happened yesterday.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Pretty flawless update from the apt repo on my end.

Server version 10.11.7  
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There is a good reason I only have Jellyfin and other services accessible via valid Client Certificate.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›