ShortN0te

that in theory is correct but in practice a sentence or few lines of code don't let me fight for them in court.

Pls dont bother to answer if you do not have a proof that a simple sentence or a simple line of code has any meaning for copyright in the court. And no i dont mean the few sentences that are actually copyrighted since they are catchphrases to specifics. No i mean a general sentence, or line of code.

Try to copyright "i = i + 1". Then we can continue this talk.

When i write a sentence then do i have a copyright upon it which i can defend in law? No. Yes copyright is nothing you get, that in theory is correct but in practice a sentence or few lines of code don't let me fight for them in court.

The current models are all trained with data which at least some larger creator (book writer or whatever) does not want a model to be trained on. So the discussion is a complete other, not how ppl will be compensated on their unlawful use of their data but on how the payment works in the future and here comes my first comment back.

The current models are under the current law unsustainable. And more and more courts rule in this direction.

Ah ha! You see, that's the problem.

No. Meaningful in the sense of copyright. Data you get copyright

There you got your distinction.

Class action lawsuits. How would something like this work for anything else? Like Netflix subscription violations?

And we are talking about meaningful data not your shitpost, like licensed code or a book you wrote and anthropic pirated.

I don't think it's really possible to do this.

Why not? Both parties have to figure out how much they want to pay or to get payed. Similar like it works for any other license like on Netflix or Spotify. It is not the AI companies job to determine how much they will get payed but how much the data is worth to them and the data creator how much they want.

If i am at a bakery and the bread they offer does not look like its for that much to me then i have not to buy it.

Ah ok. Was confused. Cause that would have made the community edition mostly useless.

Maybe you mixed that up with the Tenant System in the enterprise Edition?

I do not think that this is correct. Otherwise multiple permission features that are part of the community branch would not make sense. Like "impersonate".

Do you have a link to the part in the documentation?

As of now, i keep them basically for ever, but granularity gets less over time. (restic forget)

Before you go nuts about files you want to exculde the "churn" as you said it, go ahead and actually check how much space this actually takes up. Text and especially logs are highly compressible and will most likely end up taking up almost no space.

Be sure you backup everything you actually need, rather backup a file more then a file too less.

Lock in is more about open standards and protocols then it is about an opinionated implementation. Yes there is not simple "export to whatever" and an alternative service that dies an "import from home assistant"

But you cannot blame a service for not having any valid alternative or other options.

Its either 20 different vendor logins and apps or home assistant.

Personally? No. Since i am not dumb enough to torrent without at least some kind of protection.

But there are law firms that are specialized on this topic, like for example FROMMER-LEGAL.

When you search for then online, you will find many users who have received Abmahnungen.

Thats not correct. Abmahnungen need to be actively dealt with. Ignoring them is not enough. While you do not necessarily need an attorney it is highly adviced to let someone write the letter for you.

Some random source for some infos: https://anwalts-atlas.de/was-passiert-wirklich-wenn-man-eine-abmahnung-ignorieren-sollte/

The charging cirtuit that also tries to guess the battery percentage can be the problem. The 'guessed percentage' will depending on the chip and programming go down even if you solder in a dc power supply. When it hits the 0% it will shutdown.

Thats the case for some smart phones.