this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4957 readers
168 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

In a statement, Responsible Wagering Australia - the peak body for betting agencies - said the new measures are "draconian" and set a "dangerous precedent".

So a step in the right direction.

"Today it's gambling advertising, tomorrow it's alcohol, then it's sugary drinks, fast food, critical minerals and who knows what else comes next," chief executive Kai Cantwell said.

Yes. Please yes.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well bugger me I thought they were going to present the downsides

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I know right?

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell yeah. Love when they squirm and try and create fear.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Where were their "draconian" virtue signals when the government colluded with surveillance capitalist techno-fascists to force Australians to hand over their identity to big brother to use social media?

Oh, that's right. They only exist for greed and exploitation; they only believe what they're paid to believe.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ahh, the ol' "slippery slope" logical fallacy. You can dismiss statements like those. You don't even need to debate it.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

fIrSt ThEy CaMe FoR tHe FrAcKiNg CoMpAnIeS…

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I am sure they made the same arguments back when tobacco was being targeted.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'd be happy with getting rid of all advertising tbh.

[–] ProbablyNotAnExpert@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed! I'm struggling to see what the problem is with less maccas and coke adds

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't the gambling industry behind pushing the whole 'no kids on social media' thing. Kicking off I'd verification everywhere and now they still can't run ads but the internet is worse off. Wild.

[–] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It comes from many sources. Governments want age-verification for surveillance, advertisers want it to target people and ensure those people are real, social media companies want it for similar reasons, hackers want it so they have more IDs to steal, and (some) voters want it because they're idiots

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago