this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
39 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

83631 readers
4017 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why is there a can of salmon in the picture??

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 47 minutes ago

It’s a finger under heavy magnification, if you’re not joking.

If you are, it’s because they wanted to demonstrate how e-fish-ient their new technology is.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I always assumed nanoscale robots would need to be lithography-based. Seems that was right. On the other hand, I assumed a MEMS actuator… their solid state propulsion is very interesting.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Article is locked for me, but I'm assuming piezo crystals?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The robot’s electrokinetic propulsion exploits microscale physics. Platinum electrodes drive fluid flow with no moving parts at around 60 nanoamperes. Four electrodes enable translation, rotation, and arcing. They currently operate at 1 volt, but could reach 10 times faster speeds near water’s electrolysis limit.

Electric field propulsion, apparently

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I can only see the picture but from the scale they seem to be too big to be nanobots. They seem to be about 3 or 4 mm so they're not going in your blood vessels that's for sure.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

Haha that picture shows one on a finger. It’s literally half the size of a single ridge of your fingerprint. Like a speck of dust.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Yay! Who had Grey Goo apocalypse for April?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 hour ago

It's alright they'll be out competed by the 5G nanobots.

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Nah, it won't be an apocalypse. Just more of the dystopia we're all completely accustomed to. You'll get ads based on the content of your blood. Police will show up at your door minutes after you ingest any illegal drug. And you know that thing where LinkedIn and dating apps are like "we may or may not have found you a match, pay us to find out!" You'll get notifications like that about cancer.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

We getting the nanos from 17776?