Any individual with a net worth of more than 500 million should have their assets seized by any state that has a desire to survive. This will run them off, which is a win-win for the state, as they use infrastructure magnitudes more than normal people and give back less than nothing - being as they are laser-focused on sucking up every resource in their vicinity. This will give any such state a distinct competitive advantage over states that allow themselves to be exploited.
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
122 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
4476 readers
791 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, especially considering that the ultra-wealthy don’t generally collect income. They use assets as collateral for low/zero interest loans and may even claim negative income as a result. We need a wealth tax and banking regulation that prevents the loan trick from working.
honestly at this point we should just compost them and cut our losses
Grass looking for compost.... Not sus at all.
thats why you seize thier accounts, in those shady banks like swiss , and deustche.
I'm interested in the debate between wealth taxes versus closing other loopholes (like using untaxed assets as loan collateral).
What are the arguments for both sides?
If you tax income then the ultra wealthy can find some financial construction to ensure that they have zero income. Of course, this is also true for wealth (see: the Gates Foundation), so maybe there is no good solution. 😅
If magazines like Forbes can make up a system to measure the wealth of the richest, then there is a way to tax them.