this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
244 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

21196 readers
1544 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 93 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

tackling this vile content will make our country a safer place for women

Doubt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gigachad@piefed.social 87 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I never understood this whole step porn thing, but this is ridiculous lol

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 42 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah.

I don’t get it, it’s weird, but is it 5 years in jail weird? No.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

it's taboo. that's all there is to get.

taboos are sexy.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 29 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

It cheap to make. The "story" is simple but explains why these two people live in the same house without it being incest.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 hours ago

It's also really efficient, setting up the entire relationship with just the word "step-bro". Plus, it's taboo enough for the characters to say "we shouldn't", but not SO taboo that the viewer thinks they actually shouldn't.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's also probably relatable to a significant portion of the audience. I wager a fair number of people have experienced a relationship or wanted a relationship stemming from that situation.

Through no choice of yours or theirs, suddenly you are spending a lot of time with someone. From some perspective 'relatives', but pratically speaking you have a stranger who is your age move in and you are both 15 to 17 and things happen.

I had a not-blood relation suddenly happen when we were both sixteen, and we ended up dating for a bit. A bit more removed than 'siblings', but close enough to spend a lot of time together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I think a subset of people like it, and the rest tolerate it. So, if you label every porn video as step-someone with step-other, you serve both audiences.

What I have a hard time wrapping my head around are scenarios where step-dad, step-mom, step-sis, and step-bro are all going at it in the same scene. Under what circumstances do these four people live together?

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

it's porn. it's not supposed to make any sense anymore than Marvel movies are. it's fantasy

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago

I think I understand what you're saying. I hadn't considered that the steps may be from different multiverses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's my understanding of why it's so common too.

Though I suppose there's some reason for concern, if you're really opposed to the concept of it. I view it sorta on the same spectrum as things like 'facials' and how wildly popular those have seemingly become -- a filming norm from a long time ago that mostly aimed to show/prove that the guy had cum, turns into something people do regularly because they'd seen it so much in porn. Same for things like anal, or many of the more mainstream fetishes/content -- it becomes largely normalized by its prevalence in porn.

Sorta like how that Dingus guy, Mayor in Ohio, got caught sniffing his step daughters panties. Dude prolly thought it'd be the start of a raunchy good time, where she catches him and then admits her lust for his old flabby limp dick dad bod.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 48 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The Ministry of Justice said that possessing and publishing porn showing incest between family members and sex between step or foster relatives where one person pretends to be under-18 would be a crime.

This reads like its only banned if someone also pretends to be under 18?

IDK but I thought porn depicting minors was generally banned in most countries?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

don't know if porn depicting an adult pretending to be a minor actually qualifies, but that feels like an extremely thorny topic.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Eventually a line needs to be drawn. I think that publishing porn of any sort that flirts with cp is not acceptable, step or not. Same for loli anime content or the whole doll bullshit : if it looks like a kid just don’t.

All the rest if fine as long as it’s consensual.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 62 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

You guys in the UK better burn any copies of Game of Thrones you might have around. The show wasn't that good as to be worth the jail time.

On a side note, is the UK alright?

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 26 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

No, the UK is not alright. They've been banning a lot of stuff lately. And I mean a lot. It's comparable to even the Deep South of the US, and that's hardly an exaggeration. The worst part is that most of it seems to truly be a bipartisan effort.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

It's "bipartisan" because we live in capitalist dictatorships, and the fascist oligarchy have given their marching orders to the politicians they own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

No, the UK is not alright. They are worse off than the US, less the blowhard leadership. As of yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I remember reading a while ago that, because you can't have full incest in porn, the Game of Thrones porn parody (or, at least, one of them) was LESS explicit than the show.

And no. No we're not. I doubt many places are.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wait... Are you implying that incest is actually banned in porn, and that's why it's always step-relations? I thought it was just because the majority are disgusted by incest... I don't think actual incest is even illegal in most places...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 32 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thou doth protest too much 😏

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What are you doing back there, step-government?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The royal family is a product of actual incest.

[–] coalie@piefed.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if "royal" porn will be a thing after this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The UK truly is one of the biggest jokes of a country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 13 points 8 hours ago

I'm glad politicians are spending their time solving the biggest problems we are facing.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I've noticed over the years, that the british legislators seem to be overly obsessed about porn.

Obligatory Dan Bull: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTeENEQkBKE

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago

The moral police that funded and pushed the anti trans narrative weren't going to stop at being anti trans.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

Hey, what a valuable initiative. I mean, it’s not like there are any real problems in the world...

...if there really were, that would just be a distraction...

...and that can’t possibly be the case...

/s

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 7 hours ago

What are you doing, Step-MP?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›