this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
542 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21227 readers
2592 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck is going on with the UK?

Isn’t incest not even a crime?

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Meanwhile, incest is legal in France, for example

Weird world we live in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_incest

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Ah yes, because fictional scenarios of incest relations might as well be engaging in the real thing. If even the Epstein class says it then surely it must be true.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's the UK government, their digital crimes division is basically 2 men in a shed

This is basically a rule that will not get policed unless they wanna find an excuse to fuck over a dissident that they can't find any other excuse to put in prison

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You heard 'em!

I don't know why we have a giant "incest porn" machine, but I suppose every dog has his day.

flips switch

to overdrive

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 days ago

I'm just imagining the millions of taxpayer money that they are going to waste running around trying to enforce this. 🤣

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Political virtue signaling.

"We're not pedos!"

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago

Us: Then go after the pedos?

Them: No

[–] madjo@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kier wants to fuck his stepmom? Or does he prefer the nanny(state)?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoohoohoot@fedinsfw.app 5 points 2 days ago

How about we pray that the person who introduced that law and people who made it official, die in a horrible fire?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

While it's odd to me that incest porn took off so much these last 15 years, the government doesn't have the right to do such a thing.

I remember browsing porn a long time ago, 15 years or more maybe, and finding otherwise good porn that was under the incest, stepmom kind of thing, it was mostly russian then if I recall, but now it's everywhere. I hardly watch porn now but when I do browse it, it's everywhere now.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

My theory is they relabel the same porn to catch different low effort fetishes. I have seen the same porn labled or titled such that it suggests different scenarios. brother/sister, dad/daughter, husband/wife, husbandbestfriend/wife, etc.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

12-step programs in shambles

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

10% of me expected the announcement about naughtiness to turn into an adult movie at the end.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›