this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
91 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

6556 readers
268 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As major news outlets cut off the Wayback Machine, journalists and advocacy groups are rallying to protect the Internet Archive’s vast collection of web pages.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260413111431/https://www.wired.com/story/the-internets-most-powerful-archiving-tool-is-in-mortal-peril/

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I certainly hope that the Wayback machine is setting up a number of independent proxies.

These “independent journalist agencies” or whatever forget that once you put something on the Internet, it’s there forever. Getting something off of the Internet is like trying to get pee out of a pool. Or, more like trying to get pee out of the ocean.

They have had, literally, decades to whine and cry about whatever copyright bullshit claims they have. And they have. They have been repeatedly adjudicated in national and international courts all over the globe, and they have repeatedly been repudiated. Now, they simply don’t want to be held accountable for the horrible things they publish, because they want to be able to take down and edit articles they publish which are no longer truthful. Far beyond their claims of copyright infringement.

And there are no legalistic frameworks to sue against archiving those sorts of publishing malfeasance.

Sadly, for them, once you put it online, it can be archived by anyone, and the Internet archive and the way back machine simply need to make very simple adjustments to their archival methods to continue what they do.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago

It's all about the benjamins:

A number of other major journalism organizations have also recently moved to restrict the Wayback Machine from archiving their stories, including The New York Times. According to analysis by the artificial-intelligence-detection startup Originality AI, 23 major news sites are currently blocking ia_archiverbot, the web crawler commonly used by the Internet Archive for the Wayback project. The social platform Reddit is too. Other outlets are limiting the project in different ways: The Guardian does not block the crawler, but it excludes its content from the Internet Archive API and filters out articles from the Wayback Machine interface, which makes it harder for regular people to access archived versions of its articles.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I couldn't even read this all because "I have already read my last free article...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago

What’s up with that anyways?

If you go in with no cookies you still get that. Bitch you don’t s know what I’ve read! Maybe I’ve never read wired even offline. Then your statement is false.

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 6 points 3 hours ago

I take it as a threat. Come at me, wired!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 hours ago

Journalism is already dead if journalists cannot defend the archive service for their journalism from the pointless wrath of their own employers.

shrugs I mean I look forward to one day rebuilding these things when we finally have a chance but this is the end of the road for traditional news organizations on the internet.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

truth will die if there is no independent archive.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

IMO all things on the clearnet will eventually succumb to near constant corporate influence. I2P will be the main way people actually use the internet in the future I think, though ofc I only have a surface level knowledge of what it is.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I2p has some serious issues

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

I don't doubt it.