this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
54 points (98.2% liked)

World News

55643 readers
2745 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 29 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (6 children)

What the fuck is "half a pickup truck" for a measure

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 21 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Americans will use anything other than the metric system.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 45 minutes ago (2 children)

As an american, I am 100% onboard on switching entirely to measuring things in terms of pickup trucks.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 4 points 28 minutes ago
  1. Preheat oven to 1 pickup truck
  2. Bake for 1 pickup truck
[–] gnate@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

But the reference objects keep getting bigger!

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago

It's like a cubit, it changes depending on who's in charge.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Two of them is roughly the size of a pickup truck...

Like, it's volume, they could say X gallons, but it would be hard for people to visualize. So people use an example most readers would be familiar with.

Have you honestly never wondered why journalists use random things? Or has no one taken the time to answer before?

It's been common literally for centuries before either of us were born, but most likely all of human existence. Just with animals like buffalo instead of pickup trucks.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

The problem is he’s Unfortunately, short, so he has a hard time on visualizing things like the size of pick up, which are quite large

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 minutes ago

but how many hamburgers is it?!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Americans will use literally anything except the metric system 😔

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 38 minutes ago

You posted a minute earlier, but the other guy got the upvotes. Or maybe the timing is based on instance?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Half of the standard passenger vehicle around here.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 37 minutes ago

Probably 1.25x the size of a washing machine

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 51 minutes ago (2 children)

As was always the plan for these satellites.

The article raises a vague concern about Kessler syndrome. This is exactly why these satellites are designed to deorbit once their useful lifespan is finished. I don't see what the point of this article is at all.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

They probably burn up also

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 30 minutes ago

Yeah, they actually design them with reentry in mind to maximize the burn-up and ensure no pieces hit the ground. I recall they had a bit of difficulty when they first introduced laser data links to the design because the lenses the satellites used were large pieces of glass that would make it to the ground on reentry, they had to redesign them to fragment more easily.

[–] gnate@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

Part of the plan, sure, but that doesn't mean it's a good plan. They don't have control of where the debris lands, and Starlink doesn't take responsibility for cleanup when it lands on others' property.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 minutes ago

The debris will be microscopic. It won't "land" anywhere noticeable.

The fine particulate matter may not be great for the ozone layer, but it's actually pretty negligible compared to all of the other pollution that we're not addressing either. That doesn't justify the pollution, but hopefully it helps contextualize it.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 2 points 23 minutes ago

and, is that half an F150 or half a Ranger?

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I yearn for the day Kessler Syndrome finally locks us on this rock with the billionaires that have ruined this planet for personal gains.

Their hastily built escape rockets coming face to face with chunks of debris travelling at orbital velocity, would truly be poetic justice.

Heralding the beginning of an actual civilised society, one without the people that spend their lives manipulating world governments and public opinion through lobbying and mass media.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The syndrome is kind of already in effect it's just in very early cycles. It was a few months ago the ISS made emergency maneuvers to avoid debris and a few weeks ago some telecom satellite lost comms and they assume from debris. Won't be long as more debris multiplies that it becomes unmanageable and untraceable so bad that your scenario starts happening.

Although realistically with the strides we've made in orbital liftoff weights they'll probably start armoring shit.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Given that they left the shuttle booster unpainted to save on weight, I doubt we'll be able to launch anything with armour that can stop anything but the smallest shards from doing damage, we also already amrour everything to protect against the constant bombardment of space debris, where even a spec of dust can create a 2mm hole

https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Hypervelocity_impacts_and_protecting_spacecraft

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Depending on trajectory, space debris in orbit can hit you with up to 10x the velocity of an armor-piercing sabot round (which is just a metal dart). So even tanks on earth aren't armored nearly enough to survive space debris.