this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55668 readers
2923 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An internal Pentagon email outlines options for the United States to ​punish NATO allies it believes failed to support U.S. operations in the war with Iran, including suspending Spain from the alliance and reviewing the U.S. position on Britain's claim to the Falkland Islands, a U.S. official ‌told Reuters.

The policy options are detailed in a note expressing frustration at some allies' perceived reluctance or refusal to grant the United States access, basing and overflight rights - known as ABO - for the Iran war, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the email.

The email stated that ABO is "just the absolute baseline for NATO," according to the official, who added that the options were circulating at high levels in the Pentagon.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago) (1 children)

Afaik there’s no mechanism within the nato charter or any of its founding documents or principles that would allow this. So the US doing this would probably only hasten NATO falling apart, and lead to the forming of a new iteration of it without the US.

Edit: and, uh, NATO itself agrees with that first part

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 16 points 36 minutes ago (3 children)

Without the US? How the North American Treaty Organization exists without US?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

Lmfao NYT coming in hot with the AI slop 🤪

Honestly though, that’s a hilariously bad and super obvious fuck-up

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 2 points 32 minutes ago
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 minutes ago

Also, even if NATO stood for that, Canada is in NATO, so it’s still North American. The US does not own the Americas.

[–] hellequin67@lemmy.zip 10 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm sure Spain wouldn't mind. At the same time they can leave all their bases in Spain. Frankly at this point NATO would be better off without the US.

It's time Europe stood in it's own, but for US that means leaving all bases in Europe and Europe no longer sharing intelligence or purchasing US military hardware.

Good luck being a pariah state.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

EU is also reducing and disconnecting financial systems, infrastructure, software, critical trade and a bunch of other dependencies. The US and their businesses are less happy about that part.

[–] kablez@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

I pity any country that is slugged with buying food from the US. For a country obsessed with meat, they sure are bad at producing any worth a damn.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 16 minutes ago

Well, that's because you seem to think the same thing makes good "meat" regardless of the cut or even animal...

American beef is shit for steaks, but is the best hamburger meat. Most of our beef that's exported is ground to be mixed with "local" beef in other countries for hamburgers due to the higher fat content in American beef.

Anyways, it was just weird to see someone mention all those big issues, and then someone to chime in with something that really doesn't matter and they clearly don't understand

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 minutes ago

NATO is a defensive treaty. No NATO member was attacked by Iran. As usual, Trump is full of shit.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 3 points 17 minutes ago

Isn't NATO a defensive organization? Crybaby taco Trump is acting like they're his personal army and if they don't attack who he says to attack then they should be punished....

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

All the more reason for the EU to leave NATO as a united bloc.

What value does a defense alliance have when the most influential country in its ranks is ruled by a psychopath who openly threatens its members with a war of aggression and commits the most heinous war crimes elsewhere in the world?

We simply have to be realistic: The U.S. is now the enemy of the free world. Nothing will ever change that, because the American people will never rise up against their own downfall.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

They might wish to learn more of what it takes to float tankers through a particular strait rather than dumb ideas.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml -2 points 19 minutes ago

NATO is already dead. Nobody believes that the.participating nations will act to protect one another.