We can mobilize tens of thousands of ICE officers to get day laborers, but can't afford a few hundred detectives to hunt down these eminently findable clearnet site operators.
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
62 points (95.6% liked)
Technology
84069 readers
2974 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, who would have thunk that people would suffer and pedophiles would be enjoying safe havens if we put the Epstein class in charge of the country?
In "fairness", all it takes to be an ice agent is two legs, a trigger finger and the ability to goose step with one hand raised. It takes a small amount of actual brain power to do real investigations
I wonder if the pedo-king Donald Trump has a stake in these sites, meaning they’ll never be taken down
Nope, he had a guy for that. Plus he could get someone to find him a woman like Stormy Daniels.
If these sites are known, why are they allowed to operate? AFAIK there is no country where it is legal.
In some cases they’re deliberately allowed to operate as a honey trap, allowing authorities to identify and arrest as many users as possible.
If you simply shut the site down, the users go elsewhere and you have to find them again.
OK, personally I don't think such honey traps should be legal, you can never say for sure, that a person falling for it, would use an illegal site if the honey trap didn't exist.
IMO it's immoral, and luckily in my country they are in principle illegal, although the police here is trying to push the line on that.
The honey trap could be the thing that "ignited" the interest for an individual!
It can also be the trigger for other people to make similar sites, as in if they can do it, we can do it too.
Honey traps break with the fundamentals of justice in many ways, and making them legal is a sign of a sick society IMO.
You don't just accidentally stumble upon a honey pot/illegal website, you intentionally stumble into them by going to shady websites, and then clicking links to even shadier websites.
Why would you click on the links to these shadier websites? Because the thumbnails approximate what you're looking for; barely legal teens, only not barely.
Pedophelic interest doesn't "ignite". It's not like other kinks/fetishes which require exposure to discover.
The real immorality of the issue should come from the fact that the honey pots are still using child sexual abuse material, which is almost certainly used without the adult victims consent.
This does raise an interesting ethical dilemma; if an adult consents to law enforcement using CSAM made while they were a minor for the purposes of identifying individuals with the capacity to cause harm, or contribute financially to those causing harm - is that ethical?
Is it really illegal if it’s intentionally never prosecuted?
Seems it's not illegal if you are a billionaire.
But at least in Europe it has consequences for people if they are in the Epstein files.
But in USA it seems it's just considered to be a group of friends with special interests! 🤢
Who would have thought, Trump steals another election and now pedos are making more money than ever
These strange coincidences just keep piling on, eh?
the Republicans running it fify but I guess gang fits as well
IWF is a UK organisation
They mean the website operators.