this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
331 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48342 readers
296 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 days ago

I want this bill dead not compromised.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How about instead the parents decide? I can let me kid use the computer for as long or as little as I want. Cars have no age verification. Simply driving as a minor is not allowed. I get to train my kid to drive or go to driving school. Thus a computer simply needs me to be root and for I to establish my own control and destructions. If the law says you can't be on the internet as a minor, then fine I can restrict the internet access. Otherwise a computer is just a fancy calculator.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t that how the proposed law was going to work?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, they want everyone, including the household admin to identify themselves. Might as well serve my balls fried on a silver platter to any scammer looking for a fun time.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Is this different from the California law? Do you support that one?

[–] super_user_do@feddit.it 4 points 6 days ago

No shit finally good news

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 90 points 1 week ago

This just proves the entire bill is fucking stupid if they can do this.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago

This is good news. Better news would be dropping the bill, but at least this won't hurt FOSS.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I worry that if we get lots of diff jurisdictions with diff laws, it may be easiest for an OS to comply iwth the most strict of them.

Lax ones don't require age verification, but also don't forbid it. Strict ones require it. You can comply with both at once.

Maybe doesn't matter if you can easily bypass the age check. Which is true at the present time. But things like this, they often slip-slope into more KYC style of hard to get around. All it takes is a horrible event all over the headlines. If it "could have been stopped" with stricter measures, they'll come. Once you have a hammer, all problems are nails.

[–] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

I would love to see a country go the other way and put IDs and biometric data in a special category where companies are either banned from collecting it or required to be held liable for damages if it's stolen or misused. It'll never happen though

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How in the fuck can they restrict software download? This is impossible to do. This law is bullshit cloaking the fact that the technogarchs want this and are fully in control.

Europe won’t save us. Their leaders are either in on it or so fucking stupid they keep building moats for these software companies. All these European laws, and everything just gets worse. These companies are more powerful now, not less. Now they want your iris and to decide if you’re fit to drive your own car.

All under the guise of saving the children that they all want to record to figure out which ones to rape. Brought to you by the global billionaire class. A country isn’t doing this to anyone. That’s another distraction from the fucking class war. These billionaires are the globalists. They answer to no nation state. The only true sovereigns left. And they are clearly winning.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Europe won’t save us.

I agree. But that wasn't what I meant. I meant it in the other direction. That we may slowly get forced into more and more requirements to give a real world identity, to use the internet. Some nations are moving that way. Even if they aren't all the way there yet, they would love to.

Maybe it'll never get that far, I don't know. I agree big tech companies are more powerful now than ever. It's a huge damn problem.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

How in the fuck can they restrict software download? This is impossible to do.

This is possible if the government continues its path

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I worry that if we get lots of diff jurisdictions with diff laws, it may be easiest for an OS to comply iwth the most strict of them.

i used to work for an online gaming company and the rules that we applied for the europe were set by gdpr because they were the strictest at the time.

[–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The amendment is here, page 6.

With the wording of "without restriction", the GPL could be arguably "too restrictive". Well, probably for a court to decide. I guess 9front is safe regardless...