this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Comic Strips

23513 readers
1806 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules

  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.

  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.

  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.

  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!

  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/

  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.

  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]

  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dohpaz42@lemmy.world
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
Harvey656@lemmy.world
slazer2au@lemmy.world
otter@lemmy.ca
cannedtuna@lemmy.world
18107@aussie.zone
otter@lemmy.world
0
[Meta] Posting comics from transphobic artists? (multiverse.soulism.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Grail@multiverse.soulism.net to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Now that this community has mods, I think we should come to something approaching a consensus on whether there should be a rule against posting "nice" comics from transphobic and other kinds of bigoted artists. People like Stonetoss and Jago who have a lot of innocent-looking relatable comics, but also post the most mean, bigoted propaganda.

And I'd like to present a third option besides yes and no: one might post comics from bigoted artists after removing the artist credit, if the mods think that's a good compromise.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hi! As of right now, here is my take on the situation: as long as the comics (and posters posting them) do not break the rules, they are allowed. If we were to ban content based on its creators, there probably would be a lot of content people would miss out on. Take for example Harry Potter. In my personal opinion, the author is a trash person, and I personally will no longer invest my time, effort, or money into their franchise. However, the stories and lore and fan base are still good. There is an actor who had a recurring (and popular) role in Star Trek: TNG (and a few episodes of Voyageur) who turned out to be a trash person. But, the memes and other content being posted about their roles are still funny and entertaining.

I guess what I am trying to say is that I feel that the content is not always a direct reflection of the bad values that their creators/portrayers may have. But, if the community as a whole wants to band together and downvote said content or petition for a new rule that includes a common identifier (i.e., artist name) in the title so it can be keyword filtered by individuals, I would certainly support those efforts. I am definitely not on the side of removing artist credit, even if the artist is not someone I like for whatever reason. They still deserve credit for their work; if anything, so as to ensure other people know who they are and what kind of work they produce.

And if you have other ideas for how we can address these types of situations, please keep them coming.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Take for example Harry Potter. In my personal opinion, the author is a trash person, and I personally will no longer invest my time, effort, or money into their franchise. However, the stories and lore and fan base are still good. There is an actor who had a recurring (and popular) role in Star Trek: TNG (and a few episodes of Voyageur) who turned out to be a trash person. But, the memes and other content being posted about their roles are still funny and entertaining.

The difference is the creators in question aren't the ones making that content. A webcomic about the world of Harry Potter created by someone else has levels of separation from the source material, but if JK started a webcomic, I would object to it being posted and promoted here.

[–] wolfrasin@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Bigotry belongs in the bin. Denial of platform is nice too. Banned creator list feels appropriate

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Now that this community has mods

Oh hey. Was Beep banned? Once it became clear they were just trolling and not simply an eccentric internet person I blocked them.

As for the question: If the comics themselves are not hateful or dog whistles for hate, I don't see a problem with posting the comic by itself. Just don't link to the artist's personal sites to give them traffic and maybe include a note about them in the body of the post.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are many comics in the world. Banning a handful of horrible creators won't starve the community for content. It will create space for non-horrible artists.

Allowing the "nice" comics by horrible people just creates a funnel for people to click though and be exposed to hateful ideas.

If in several months the ban list has grown monstrous in size, we could revisit, but that seems unlikely.

It's not book burning or censorship. The horrible creators remain entitled to host their own websites or their own instances.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can you explain to me how censorship of problematic artists is not really censorship?

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because a comics sub on Lemmy is not the government or a church or any other powerful organisation that has any reach beyond itself

It's a small community of people who are allowed to decide not to welcome bigotry

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ohhhhh so when its just a few people its okay to ignore things they dont like. Quick, hid that info from billion dollar fossil fuel advocates! They must never know the power of ignoring inconvenient reality. Imagine how well they'd sleep at night

[–] mlc894@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

β€œIf we don’t flood the front page with Nazi stuff, we’re as bad as the Nazis” was always my least favorite argument.

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If I step into your group of friends one evening and start an unprompted 4 hour lecture on 17th Century Agriculture, would it be censorship if you asked me to leave?

Small communities are allowed to curate themselves. It's not censorship without that power dynamic, and on some level you yourself must understand this since your go-to comparison was 'billion dollar fossil fuel advocates'

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Curating would require active moderation. This isnt a proposal for increased moderation, but a content based ban decided by which artists are or are not haram to your leftist sensibilities at any given time. Why should the lemmy.world instance of comicstrips be censored when you can make a new instance like "safestripsforgoodboysandgirls" instead of fucking over the larger community?

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Why should the lemmy.world instance of comicstrips be censored when you can make a new instance like "safestripsforgoodboysandgirls" instead of fucking over the larger community?

If most people here are in favour of it, then that's why.

And then you can leave and make a new instance with your preferred amount of bigotry

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Will you write "I'm an idiot" on your forehead for me? If not, am I being censored? Why or why not? Should you be obligated to carry my message anywhere I desire?

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody should be obligated to parrot your mouth diarrhea, no. But that does not mean its okay for an entire community to discourage your mouth diarrhea simply for being distasteful.

That's censorship, just in case you were having trouble identifying the concept we are discussing.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody is obligated but the community is obligated?

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Personal preference is not censorship. Banning an artist from an artistic community because the community can't regulate their own emotions is censorship.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So the individuals running a forum cannot moderate the forum. It must be open to any and all content. Otherwise that is censorship, and bad.

Well, I infer from your tone you think censorship is always bad. Maybe you're just splitting a hair about how in a sense content moderation is censorship.

because the community can’t regulate their own emotions is censorship.

The biggest eyeroll

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My big problem with censorship is that it dulls the mind. Safe spaces do the same thing. If your thoughts and beliefs are never questioned, you can never grow as a person. Echo chambers are breeding grounds for ignorance. Our world is not tolerant of ignorance. Being unable to react appropriately to emotionally inflammatory bait makes us all weaker on an emotional level.

If you want to coddle yourself, make a safe space to do so. Don't take an open forum and limit it to suit your preferences. The internet is infinite. Make a new space with your own rules.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Make a new space with your own rules

That's what's happening here and you're whining about it. Follow your own advice.

My big problem with censorship is that it dulls the mind. Safe spaces do the same thing. If your thoughts and beliefs are never questioned, you can never grow as a person. Echo chambers are breeding grounds for ignorance. Our world is not tolerant of ignorance. Being unable to react appropriately to emotionally inflammatory bait makes us all weaker on an emotional level.

Also this is nonsense. Some topics don't need to be relitigated. No one benefits from giving "maybe {racist trope} is real" a platform and legitimacy.

Furthermore, allowing stuff like Nazi ideas is corrosive to the community. Like the anecdote about the Nazi bar posted elsewhere, if you let that stuff in then you end up with all the other people leaving.

You are wrong and your ideas are counter productive for maintaining a vibrant community. Many left wing spaces ban Nazi apologia, and have no shortage of debate and competing thought.

Claiming your opponents are just emotionally weak is also laughable. You sound like a real sad sack neo-nazi incel projecting his own shortcomings.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

You aren't making a new space. You're fucking up an existing space, and that's very different.

Instead of making "safehappytimecomicstrips" as an instance, youre dictating what a larger, already established instance is going to do in the future. You're taking the general board and turning it into a niche community to suit your own personal interests, and that's not okay.

What if some billionaire bought up a newspaper because they were tired of seeing articles about wealth inequality and only wanted content that exclusively promoted their own viewpoint?

Oh wait....

That's you. You're the Jeff Bezos of internet discussion. Hooray! You did it. You showed those bigots how REAL bigotry is done. Good for you. Im glad your censorship is such an ideological win for you.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No thank you to censorship.

[–] spud@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you can leave

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Thank you for your constructive input on this discussion

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hate this book burning mentality. It's not because the person is bad that the content is nessarly bad. Like, if war and peas's author turned out to be transphobic, would that automatically turn all of their comics bad?

Although it doesn't mean that hate and bigoted comics shouldn't be banned. That part is the actual offensive part.

And removing credits is actually scummier than posting bigoted comics imo

For reference, this is not to shill those persons. I'm literally trans and bi. I'm actually concerned with what those are artists are against.

[–] ImUsuallyMoreClever@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This isn't book burning. This is more like we're refusing to print and distribute more copies of their books for them.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no. I have a block button if I don't like how a person submits. why would I want this type of thing done at the community level? Ultimately its the federation so it won't matter as there are other comic communities.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

why would I want this type of thing done at the community level?

I have an RSS feed for my unfiltered comics.

I read here for the community.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't use rss but I agree im here for community engagement but not for community censorship.

[–] SkaraBrae@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I would prefer that the content is not censored by someone else's moral compass. If it's content by a transphobic or otherwise bigoted artist then let us know in the comments. Book burning is bad, no matter who is doing the burning. I would prefer to be educated than have someone else determine what is appropriate for me to view.

TL:DR I'm an adult: I'd rather choose for myself.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Banning comics from bigots in a lemmy community is not remotely similar to book burning.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And as an trans adult I would rather not be exposed to it at all.

I don’t want a community that’s like 4Chan, I want some where that’s respectful and takes into consideration the wellbeing of its users without platforming hate artists.

[–] SkaraBrae@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can respect that. I would suggest blocking the users that post the stuff you don't want to see. I would prefer, though, that you educate me about why and how these artists are offensive to you. I can be a better ally if I understand. You gain nothing if I'm kept ignorant just because you say so. I also understand that you're probably tired of having to defend yourself and explain yourself over and over again. I would guess that there's an existential fatigue just trying to live in a society that seems to be offended by your very existence. I'm sorry. I try to call it out when I see it, but I don't see it as often as I should and I think that hiding it, even comic strips, doesn't help me to understand better. I need you, with lived experience, to point it out to me so I know what to look for.

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It isn't their job to educate you, in fact requesting that is putting that additional burden on someone who is already burdened by this bigotry.

It is really unfair to ask them to explain it so that you can be a better ally. If you want to be a better ally it is worth looking into it yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yAbQ-CaJXs

That is a good primer, but it is just one person's perspective. If you search "stonetoss Nazi" or "stonetoss bigot" you will get tonnes of people explaining it in more detail.

Just to be super duper clear, I'm not dragging you here. I'm not saying "you suck for not knowing, you should know, and asking is just you being a bad person". That would be silly and short sighted. I am saying that as a person who is not trans you are not experiencing the horror of anti trans bigotry all day every day and so you aren't worn down by it. You surely have your own problems and they are real and hard, and so do trans people. It makes sense to listen when they speak about it and hear what they are saying, but asking them to spend their energy on your understanding is a different thing. You can spend your own energy on figuring it out and make yourself a better ally.