Gotta protect that illegal, anticompetitive trust at all costs.
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
165 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
69867 readers
3215 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Die apple. All your innovation and vision died with Steve Jobs, now you're a shambling corpse infecting everything you touch. Just die, it's time...
Steve Jobs was an old quack business man. he didn't invent shit.
Sure, he wasn't an engineer, so no, Jobs never personally "invented" anything. But Jobs at least knew what was good and what was shit when he saw it. Under Tim Cook, Apple just keeps putting out shitty unimaginative products, Cook is allowing Apple to stagnate, a dangerous thing to do when they have under 10% market share.
Apple’s ARM SoC’s were some of their best work yet in my view.
Yep crApple is the one pushing for the shorter SSL certificate length too. Their just adding headaches to everyone's lives for no good reason.
Shorter SSL certificate length means more security
Even Mozilla's pushing it
Yeah and having a 512 character password is more secure than 52.
This isn't some big exploit vector they're fixing, they're trying to make it more annoying to automate a IoT stack without the cloud.
Do you have a link to an explanation of this? I am curious to learn more
I'm going on what I heard from Security Now but it is my understanding that apple was the only one pushing for this and the others just voted to approve even though apple was never able to present a convincing argument for why it needed to be shortened.
However, this U.S. court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards
This is terrible writing. The court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards? No. The court ruled that Apple's business practices were illegal.
USA's press has a corporate bias, because you know, we need to care about the corporations, as if they had feelings, and not the exploitive entities that they are.
This doesn't seem to be the mainstream press, but a small tech blog. Mainstream American news outlets have been far more straightforward in their coverage of this case.
Furthermore, this case was a fight between two large corporations; there's no little guy here. Smaller developers may benefit from the outcome though.
I will never support Apple because of their anti-consuner practices.
The sissy billionaire slap fight continues.
Fight back deez nuts.