this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
493 points (96.6% liked)

Comic Strips

23536 readers
2235 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

IMDb is charitable and fairly reasonable and accurate compared to Rotten Tomatoes.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Most people don't understand how Rotten Tomato's grades movies.

If the score is 91%, that doesn't mean the average viewer gave the movie a score of 91%, it means that 91% of the people who rated the movie, rated it >60%

Here's another way of thinking about it:

If a movie is rated by three people, 62%, 72%, 67%, then the movie will receive a RT score of 100%.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That means that Rotten Tomatoes rating system even shittier than I had thought it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CyanideShotInjection@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Rotten Tomatoes is a review aggregator. They don't decide what score the movie will have. The critics submit their reviews and the score is the percentage of critics who's own score is at or above 60%. It also shows the average rating. I think having hese two metrics is a great way to actually see if a movie is worth watching.

I also check out IMDb scores but it shows that it's mostly generated by regular users. And the average user doesn't know jack about cinema. Just looking at the top 250 : how is Shawshank the best movie of all time ? It's a great movie, but come on... just in general there are so many average movies that rank way too high while actual masterpieces are under the 100th position. It's not a ranking of the best movies OAT, it's a ranking of the most agreeable movies OAT.

Edit : The score is calculated on if a review is positive or negative. It does not specify what score is considered a positive review, I guess it is up to the critic submitting it. They also removed last year the average calculator which is sad...

[–] kip@piefed.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Shawshank was an innocent bystander in the battle between batman and godfather fans (doesn't explain why it was that high up in the first place though)

https://forums.superherohype.com/threads/imdb-watch-are-dark-knight-fanboys-burying-the-godfather.308540/

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I can't think of many examples so my comment is worthless, but for years I had this experience with Rotten Tomatoes and hated the site/community for it. Some of the most artistic and impactful films I had seen would get a 30% or something, and I'd be like how?!

I guess one more recent example that I do have was The Northman while it was still playing in theatres. It scored well enough on Rotten Tomatoes over time, but initial reviews were trash and I was hard-pressed to find a single person online who enjoyed it. Just endless shitting all over it. Comments sections full of folks calling it the worst/dumbest thing they've ever wasted their money on.

My wife and I went into it blind and were honestly blown away. It was like John Wick with Norse mythology. From the very beginning where Willem Dafoe is howling and going into a crazy shamanistic fire trance to the big otherworldly climax at the end, we were floored by how fucking cool that movie was. A genuine piece of art. Got us both playing Valheim again soon after.

Not sure what changed, but despite the 90% Tomatometer, the 64% Popcornmeter still shows that audiences were fairly divided. But that spread was way worse a few years ago. The part that perplexed me most is that most people's criticisms of the movie could just as easily be applied to Mad Max: Fury Road (which I ironically thought was hot garbage).

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I grew up listening to ICP so I have a lot of practice discounting other people’s opinions on things that I enjoy. Also if you’re seeking out interesting, challenging, non mainstream fare, opinions are inherently going to be mixed and reviews are going to have a lot of idiots who don’t get the piece of art, saying the art is bad.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago

We don't have to agree always. There where movies I liked, and people where saying otherwise.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 8 hours ago

Over time I learned to distinguish marketing hype from "it's actually a good movie/show" hype. The ratings are mostly meaningless. Highest grossing movies are usually shit and get good ratings because most people like watching something they are already familiar with or because they fall for the hype and just like something because everyone likes it. Same with "bad" movies. People will give low ratings to movies they don't understand or are too original for them. I learned to pick up movies and shows that are mentioned organically from time to time and ignore the ones everyone starts talking about suddenly. One thing indicates there's actually something interesting there, the other just good marketing.

[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

I usually use metacritic. Not as harsh as IMDB and not as easy going as RT.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I have that problem with steam sometimes. Some games are rated "overwhelmingly positive", but are aimed at a young adult audience, younger than me. Some games are then also fun for me, others are not. It would be great to know what people of my age think about a game, rather than just its target group.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 0 points 7 hours ago
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί