this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
444 points (98.9% liked)

News

29277 readers
20 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 123 points 6 days ago

Turns out the current administration is not huge on accountability. I'm shocked.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 105 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 71 points 6 days ago (3 children)

And find a way to have it automatically sync to the cloud, with automatic release if certain reporting in parameters aren’t met

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

~~the ACLU Mobile Justice app does this~~

Holy shit they shut it down a month after dorito stain took office what the fuck

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Bad timing, but I'm guessing they ran out of funding to continue app development, since now they have so much legal battles to do. The app was already broken, buggy, and barely functional for the past 5 years.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. The current best option is probably a regular video + cloud sync like Google Photos.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Or YouTube live

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Hopefully they don't start carrying something that jams signals to disable the ability for something to sync to a cloud.

If that ends up being the case, "evidence" of crimes isn't going to help anyone being victimized much. 😓

[–] ActuallyGoingCrazy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They've already had devices to capture cellular connections for a while now, I'd imagine jamming bands would be even easier.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago

Signal jammers are available for purchase online and depending on purpose are affordable and compact.

That said; often they are illegal for civilians.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We need a contraption where a cable is connecting your body cam to a friend following you, and the recording is synched through the cable to a storage device they hold. Then if SHTF, the friend can run with the footage they have and give it a reputable journalist or ACLU.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I feel like if you found a way to do a mesh net (ive been really into Meshtastic as of late, but the data throughput of LoRA would not cut it), and have other members of the mesh sync the file (encrypted and compressed) that would work. Share the unlock code with a friend or a small group, that way you always have backups on other people's devices.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

I also, too, find lora Radio to be interesting. I think it has many applications to deal with tyranny. I could see them outlawing it at least for civilians.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yea but the comment I replied to was talking about jamming, they'd probably be able to detect what frequency you are trasmitting on and jam those too. Only a hard-wired cable is immune to jamming.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

All wireless technology would be a game of cat&mouse anyway, they cant jam everything, the product would just have to be developed to take advantage of multiple open or common parts of the spectrum, like the 2.4 or 5 ghz ranges used by wi-fi.

All hypothetical, im not a product designer nor an engineer who would be able to design the specifics.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago

It was just so inconvenient having to remember to cut them off before flagrantly breaking the law

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 66 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"There's no corruption here", said the corrupt regime.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 18 points 6 days ago

What do you mean? They obviously have nothing to hide…

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

Mob rule. And not the angry crowd of people type. The Organized Crime type.

America is going to resemble every 1990s russian gangster's wet dream in half the time.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 6 days ago

With them being able to turn it off at any time they felt like it anyway, it's not like body cameras were fulfilling their (dishonestly) stated purpose of improved transparency.

Still a very bad sign that they no longer feel the need to even PRETEND to care, though..

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Losers. I guess the citizens should just record them at all times. For record sake.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You should've anyway. Redundancy is best.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Especially since they regularly refuse to release body cam footage.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 days ago

I don't need my computer to refuse to provide data before backups are a good idea.

[–] Flemmy@lemm.ee 42 points 6 days ago

Turns out it shows more evidence of corruption.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 40 points 6 days ago

A reminder to all that if there is no body cam footage when there should be, that is reasonable doubt. You have to assume the officers did the worst actions possible, and did so maliciously.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 19 points 6 days ago

If asked about how DEA agents died, people will say "Dunno", and there will be no camera to say otherwise.

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 22 points 6 days ago

Well yeah, now they can plant evidence against people opposing the ruling administrations policies.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago

It’s so you won’t see them sprinkle crack on the dead black man like Salt Bae.

In darkness freedom dies.

[–] whaleiam@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

“Dea says crime is warranted for stopping more crime”

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Body cams were never a solution to anything. I remember multiple police murders recorded on body cams were the officer was acquitted by the jury. Police murder is basically legal in US*. Recording it doesn't change anything. As for police brutality in general they simply learned to shout "stop resisting" when beating people up. Without basic accountability the recording are useless.

*It's enough if police officer thinks he is in danger to make killing legal. Pretty much if he's scared he can shoot. Body cams can't prove he wasn't scared.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Body cams aren't the solution, but they do help a lot. When cops have zero oversight, they commit way more atrocities, on average.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 6 days ago

You should read this: https://prismreports.org/2024/07/16/complex-troubling-history-police-body-cameras/

"Long before body cameras were introduced to the public and found themselves in mainstream conversations about police reform, they were first peddled to police departments by tech companies and major corporations.

With body cameras, law enforcement agencies could expand their surveillance capacity, mitigate police brutality lawsuits, create “highly controllable evidence” against the largely poor, largely Black citizens of whom police often seek to capture footage, and quell social unrest by creating “comprehensive digital archives” of attendees at protests for social change"

"It was the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, that would forever change the public conversation around police accountability and allow body cameras to take center stage. Almost immediately, body cameras were no longer being pitched behind closed doors to police departments, but were rather presented to the public as an invaluable tool for police “reform” and increased “transparency.”"

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's a reason some cops turn off their body cams before certain encounters, it's because some places do hold them accountable. At least there's a public record

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 6 days ago

There's always a small chance police officer will be held accountable but in vast majority of cases the system simply doesn't work. Body cameras are part of that system. They are used to create evidence the police can control and use in their favor. In most cases they simply hide the recordings (https://www.propublica.org/article/how-police-undermined-promise-body-cameras?c_src=33685809.57194).

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Civilians are never guilty. Police are always corrupt. Sure.