this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

77769 readers
2742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And this is why I'll never connect my working printer to the internet.

Taking a USB stick to it to print is annoying, but fuck this shit.

They're all horrible companies

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's stopping you from connecting it to the local network but denying internet access? E.g. via a firewall rule or separate VLAN?

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh FFS. Not Brother as well. I used to recommend them to everyone. Who is left with unshittified printers?

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Epson inkjets with refillable tanks probably.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Depending on the frequency of your printing, they can suck as well. Chronically clogged nozzles are maddening.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Buy an Epson EcoTank printer. My family owns three. You pay more for the printer but just dump in bottles of ink when they need refilling.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just make sure you schedule a test print every couple off weeks to prevent clogs, is a little wasteful but if you get aftermarket ink it's cheap enough that is worth it, otherwise a new head will run you down around 50 bucks.

TIL EDIT: you can get continuous tank mods for most printers on AliExpress! I might give it a try with mine!

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

I suggest whoever has old firmware files to upload them to the Internet Archive (if they allow those).

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In case anyone was thinking this applies only to inkjet printers: no, it ONLY seems to apply to laser printers -- the thing that Brother used to be known for. Where the article says "ink", they mean "toner". There is no ink in a laser printer.

[–] mlemiputty@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Could this be anything related to government printer tracking requirements?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I believe that only applies to ink jet. You can hardly make secret dots in B&W.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is something similar for B&W laser printing. Text is never 100% black, but rastered. You can digitally hide a whole lot of information in microraster on a page of printed text.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Text is never 100% black, but rastered.

Does “rastered” mean the image is mapped onto a very fine grid and each square is given a 0-100 value for intensity of ink? I looked it up, and it seemed like the squares are given a binary value, but this is nowhere near my wheelhouse and I’m honestly not sure I understood the Wikipedia page, let alone the references

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It is actually quite easy: "Black" print does not mean that 100% of all pixels are actually set. Print pixels are never perfect squares, so even if the printer only prints half of the dots, the print is still dark enough. If not, it could print 70% or 80%, but lets stick to 50% for ease of argument.

So instead of

XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX

it would print

X X X X
 X X X X
X X X X

For you, it would still be a "roughly black" spot (keep in mind these 8x3 pixel are 0.032mm wide and 0.012mm high on good laser printer).

Would you notice if the pattern was slightly different, like

X X X X
 X XX  X
X X X X

Make a bonanza of those small changes nobody can see, and you can hide thosands of bytes of data in those patterns on any printed page.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So… when there is some controversy over an article in Lemmy it gets the strike though? How did this evolve?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you read the article:

We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines.

So there’s no reason to leave an inflammatory and likely wrong title unchanged or otherwise without notation. The title is completely readable. I’m all for wrong information being flagged, and a strikethrough is a fine method of doing so.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Totally agree. Just the first time I have seen the notation.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 9 months ago

Drag thought Brother were supposed to be the makers of user friendly printers. Are they enshittifying?