this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
249 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23488 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In testimony on Capitol Hill on Tuesday and Wednesday, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins confirmed that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is now looking to fill critical positions, after agreeing to pay more than 15,000 employees' salaries and benefits through September in exchange for their resignations.

"We are actively looking and recruiting to fill those positions that are integral to the efforts and the key frontlines," Rollins told members of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.

But the need to fill positions so soon after letting people go has raised questions, including from Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

"So you let people go and you're looking for new people to fill the positions that they had experience in?" Murray asked.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 99 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Reminder that you should be forcing republicans to the margins of society using all means available to you.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 46 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I will as soon as I can find a Republican. For now, I'll just marginalize fascists pretending to be Republican.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It should be obvious to everyone at this point that this is what the Republican party has always been.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Yup. They’ve been setting this up since Reagan. Im old enough to remember Jerry Falwell and the ‘Moral’ Majority - we are living in their plan come to fruition.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago

It's disingenuous, at this point, to pretend there is a distinction.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I wish I could. The only maga hat wearing fascist in my job site acts too nice and friendly so I'll look like a raging hysterical idiot if I openly act like a dick to him. People around me either don't care or only want to keep the peace in their immediate area. Every day we get more awful news from the administration, hear about how ICE abducts random people, and see how much we've alienated ourselves in the international community. Despite all this we still collectively act like everything's fine. It's maddening.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Lol, no.

You should totes bring it up.

"Hey, I know you are a nice person-- did you vote for American children undergoing cancer treatment being deported? Are you okay with this?"

[–] martinb@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 days ago

Either be silent and accept your fate when they run out of others, or keep fighting

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 59 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Paying a premium for ridding yourself of institutional knowledge and existing experience, then paying again to fill the gap with ignorant novices, then paying yet again to train them to former levels of productivity while paying for the difference in the interrim: That's government efficiency, baby!

I mean, why pay for one thing once, when paying for the thing you already had before you threw it out four times over is clearly four times as good - just like how a double standard is twice as good as a boring singular standard. As Big Balls from DOGE would no doubt say: "That's math".

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s even worse. That institutional knowledge and loyalty was purchased with a reputation for employer stability.

Now you have neither and you can’t buy back that trust.

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

That's a very good point.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

They don't want experienced people in regulator positions. They want their people in regulator positions. I would be surprised if a majority of new hires did not have ties to Christian Nationalism.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

They said they were going to run government like a business. Businesses do this shit all the time.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

Project 2025.

Word for word.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The entertaining question would be: what do the salaries of the new employees look like, compared to the old ones? I'd suspect that the administration is thinking they can fire a well experienced, but expensive employee and hire on a cheap replacement. However, I also suspect many of those positions are fairly specialized and they are going to end up paying to get rid of all that experience and then end up paying a premiums to hire someone with the needed experience for the position.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm a contractor, and I can't express it enough how much a competent Govie makes a difference on project success. My last Govie was amazing, unfortunately he got promoted. He got replaced with 2 new govies that were formally contractors, and they are the worst, they are dumb micro managers that don't even understand how our program operates. One of them litterally sends us emails of his Gemini questions and responses with highlights. The other leads and I are very competent and have all worked for 10+ years on our project, and he sends us fucking AI responses about shit he doesn't understand about shit we do understand. Our morale has been absolutely crushed, and I have a running chat with my other leads which is just a non stop bitch fest about how fucking useless they are.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I’m curious to see how many of those 15,000 get hired back on as consultants with corresponding inflated rate, then again we are being taken over by Nazis who have no qualms about deporting cancer ridden children so maybe they’ll just fold and let the market sort it out like supply side Jesus always preaches

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Only a fool would take a government job unless they had no choice. Even if I were considering it, I would insist in negotiations for pay upfront or some kind of severance agreement.

For many years, the status quo was that you underpaid and provided an extremely stable position but in exchange received more loyal and often more experienced employees that knew how to work with the complex bureaucratic systems. Now, there’s no reason to take those jobs.

There’s no reason to take these jobs, not without a significant pay bump or other equalizing factor.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

My friend works for USDA. She says her supervisor left, and had a team of 11. Now it’s only 4 of them.. and her work has doubled.