this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
170 points (97.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31541 readers
1224 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's have a lunch and learn!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyhavesome@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

Think out of the box

I still hate "leverage" used as a synonym for "use." "We leverage technologies" yeah sure, when was the last time you had your asshole leveraged?

[–] MissingInteger@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

quiet quitting

How dare you not overachieve for your corporate overlords!

[–] interested_party@lemmy.org 0 points 24 minutes ago

"It is what it is".

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 10 points 3 hours ago

Here at Lemmy, we are steadfastly committed to leveraging our core competencies in order to drive strategic alignment across all functional units. Our focus remains unwavering on fostering a culture of continuous innovation and optimizing synergies that propel us towards achieving scalable growth and value creation for our stakeholders. By embracing agile methodologies and harnessing cutting-edge technologies, we endeavor to stay ahead of the curve, ensuring robust ROI while maintaining unparalleled customer-centricity in every facet of our operations.

Should you have any further inquiries or require additional insights into our visionary pursuits, please do not hesitate to connect with us. Together, let’s pioneer new paradigms and redefine excellence!

[–] Fidgetting@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Effectuate

I'm going to effectuate this pole right up the ass of the next person to use that word.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I can't think of a sentence in which it doesn't sound heavy handed.

Please effectuate the reports. Accounting will effectuate the invoice. HR has effectuated the hire.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

War room

You're a Karen and you're going to talk to Pete from accounting about what gift to buy for Sally's birthday

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago

You can’t fight here, this is the war room

[–] prosthetiknow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

“Cross-pollinate”

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

“Learnings” - you’re not fucking Borat!

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"double click" to mean "focus on" or "explore in more depth"

[–] tronx4002@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

It always sounds so deliberate.

[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I had a manager who at the end of every meeting (and I mean EVERY meeting) said "go team!" It was especially annoying since he wasn't actually present in 99.9% of those meetings.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Sometimes I say this in a glib or sarcastic or ironic kind of way. It's not an "every meeting" kind of thing.

I'm not a manager but maybe a supervisor I guess.

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Unrelated but I only recently realised that when someone says they believe in family values it means they want to impose their definition of "family" on everyone else.

From an employer I guess when they refer to family they're really referring to a bond beyond work, which basically means they're expecting more from you than you're paid for?

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 22 minutes ago

I've found from employers it tends to mean "we should be valued and given time at least on par, but we'll push for more, than your actual family. Work will call you at any time of day or night and you should be ready to drop everything and get in on no notice."

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

"It doesn't scale", meaning the company might have to (shudder) hire people if our business doubles.

[–] iamnotme@feddit.uk 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This phrase is currently running riot at my work. Leadership have just created a new "North Star" so that they can Kingdom Build and leave their mark; years of progress on other projects are being thrown on a mini-bonfire of the vanities.

[–] iamnotme@feddit.uk 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It’s just a bullshit saying for something they’ll never achieve.

I’ve even heard people say it’s never achievable but we should use that as our direction. I can’t stand corporate fucking bullshit.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I've never heard it in a corporate context, but I had thought in a personal context it's not necessarily something to be achieved but what is meaningful or what has value for you.

For example...

Uh..

Yeah actually IDK what my north star is. Maybe enough internet for me.

[–] sevan@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
  • Holistic
  • Double Click
  • Table Stakes
  • Jump Ball
  • Blocking & Tackling
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That they treat you like "family"

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago

They do, the family just happens to be dysfunctional and abusive.

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Ping: emailing someone

Revert: emailing someone

[Topic] came up on diary: I'm emailing someone

Signs you work in a bullshit email job.

[–] A_Porcupine@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

One company I worked for decided it was a good idea to name a bunch of firings due to performance "Project Panda" 🤦

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 hours ago

For me its more of a lack of understanding of a specific word's definition. The word? "Systematically"

"There's a problem systematically, so IT is gonna have to look at that."

They literally mean there is a problem with a computer or software and not anything related to a systematic process.

This drives me right up the wall. Everyone in management says it like a buzzword.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah, but actually streamlining things is something I like. I work on helicoptersn so example:

Aircraft is broken because of a faulty component. So the maintainer has to go and sign on to our grossly over-bloated computer (which can take anywhere from 5 to 45 minutes to start up), look up the relevant illustrated parts breakdown and download it (because they've moved everything to the cloud from our previous local servers) which runs through our exceptionally bottle-necked security system (seriously, usually ~50-100kbps download on a 100Mbps connection), find the part, log into a different system to get the national standard number and see what type it is to find what system to look in to see if we have it, look up the part location. Look up the maintenance procedure card (which is not classified) from the same place as the manual, download it at 100kbps, figure out the operational check for the replaced component is not in the card but in a separate maintenance manual, go back into that system and download that manual, find the ops check. Try to print out both the card and the ops check from whatever printer wants to work today. Fill out a requisition form, grab the part, and now you can start the job. Basically, add approximately an hour of work to any task for this nonsense.

Streamlined: Have a standalone computer that is not connected to the internet, is regularly updated via approved external hard drive with the latest Maintenance Procedure Cards and manuals, pre-filled requisition forms (with locations) for parts, lists of consumable components (like gaskets) for each repair, connected to a standalone printer hardwired to the standalone computer. Pull up card, manual, form, and ops check and print in 5 minutes.

Finding time wasters that only serve to frustrate workers and finding ways to cut those time wasters out makes the workers and the managers happy, assuming the people doing the job want to do the job well and quickly (we all want to be here, so that describes our hangar deck).

I'm a fan of streamlining.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Like many buzzwords it's both a legitimate good idea and a concept a lot of people with no idea what's going on get a bug up their asses about and use to mean "shake stuff up that had been working fine on a hunch"

load more comments
view more: next ›