this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
651 points (99.7% liked)

politics

23406 readers
2763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration’s tariff scheme appears less and less likely to bring manufacturing jobs back to U.S. shores.

Businesses across the country are crunching the numbers and realizing that, despite Donald Trump’s insistence, they can’t balance out his tariff hikes across the supply chain.

“Some manufacturers who had plans to open factories in the country say the new duties are only adding to the significant obstacles they already faced,” Bloomberg reported Friday.

That’s because the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there, requiring companies to import raw materials and factory equipment—which Trump’s tariffs have made unaffordable—from abroad.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The world has no appetite for his big beautiful luxury goods store.

USA used to be the managers and leaders of these factories, now he wants them to be the grunt workers and for some reason people are all for it.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Before Reaganomics and globalism the middle class was strong and built on the shoulders of blue collars, why do you think they forced globalism down our throat? So they could make stuff cheaply and could eradicate the middle class. I hate Trump and what he stands for, but globalism was something the left was fighting against back in the day because the left realized the consequences of losing manufacturing jobs in first world countries.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

What made those jobs available was economic opportunity, investment, building a greater whole over time. You don’t win a game of checkers by knocking over the board or a race to the bottom to become the next third world poverty labor. You win with a focussed strategy to push one checker to the other side and “king” it.

Biden was taking the right approach with the chips act , infrastructure spending, and renewable energy investments. Maybe it wasn’t flashy or loud or immediate, but would have actually built a dominant position in new technologies, including us supply chain and lots of us jobs. The biggest flaw was we needed to stick to the plan for a decade or two, but that’s what you gotta do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago

they also saw reagan was a easy to manipulate stooge, especially after his alzheimers starting to affect him, they took even greater advantage of him.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

All socialist ideologies are globalist.

"Workers of the world unite" ring any bells? "All war is class war?" Globalist rhetoric. The idea that artificial divisions like nations are weapons against the people.

You are, ironically, using the word the way Reagan and his kind used it, as an ill-defined nationalist slur to protect local profit margins.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There's a difference between fighting together against capitalism and being pro economic globalization. Economic globalization has actually hurt the workers of the world and you know full well that's what I'm talking about, you just want to argue for the sake of arguing.

https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=umiclr

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because only white Europeans deserve to have the benefits of an industrial or post industrial economy, obviously.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Go tell a kid making Nike shoes that he's benefiting

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

The way I see, ~~Trump's~~ the Trump Administration's motives are:

(1) Plunder the government of anything of value.

(2) Cause a recession so rich can buy everything up on the market.

(3) Sabotage America geopolitically on behalf of foreign adversaries, most notably Russia.

(4) Cement power in their control and go after any rivals.

Edit: For clarification, I don't think it really matters what part of this is Trump himself versus the people he surrounds himself with and permits as the executive to do what they're doing in their own personal agendas that align with one or more of these 4 points.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nah.

These are definitely someone's motives but not Trump's.

He's old and tired and petty. All he cares about is his ego, which he supports with power, revenge, and attention.

Trump doesn't have any kind of plan other than waking up every day and stroking his ego.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Why Greenland?

It destroyed the Baltic alliances that are a PITA for Russia

Why kill academics?

Our economic dominance is a PITA for Russians

Why destroy the dollar?

Ibid

Why kill NATO?

Ibid

Seems like a lot of work for a lazy old man who’s not in fear from Russian mobsters

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly, it's like thinking he had a plan the whole time to bankrupt his casinos or any of his other many failed ventures. He is just bad at leadership because his narcissism constantly self-sabotages, like with his casinos he constantly made terrible and expensive changes and his ego wouldn't allow any one working for him to challenge him, so he'd blame everyone, stiff contractors, fire competent staff who could actually turn the situation around and the next thing you know the casino is failing despite it being basically a sure bet for profit in that time and place.

It's the same here, the country will collapse because he isn't just a bad leader, he is a collection of toxic qualities that almost guarantee bad organizational outcomes even given very positive starting conditions.

[–] 100@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

doesnt help that half the voting population seems to be just as narcist and ready to go down with the ship if certain groups get fucked harder

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah that is fair and I should've elaborated this as the Trump Administration. As in, Trump doesn't care because he both successfully ran from prison, and is now able to golf pretty much all he wants. If anything he probably resents America for refusing to vote for him in 2020. So now all the pilot fish surrounding Trump who helped get him elected for their own end are reaping their end of the bargain.

So naturally you've got the Russian assets (Gabbard, Flynn, Trump himself), the zealots like Mike Johnson and Stephen Miller, the corporate oligarchical opportunists like Musk. The power-hungry (like Trump's sons, JDV, etc.), and so on. It's a big fuck-you to America and it ultimately matters little to me whether it's Trump or the broader Republican party. As far as I'm concerned they all made this; they all enabled it. They are criminal cartel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never listen to the reason they claim to be doing something, look only to what they are doing. And that, quite clearly, day after day indicates that they are doing everything they can to destroy the USA, as quickly as possible. Once one has determined what they are doing, then ask who does this benefit.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The thing is, it doesn't really benefit anyone. If you're Russia, for instance, it would be better to destroy the entire democratic world than just the United States, and Trump could have done that if he'd just moved more slowly on some of his actions (for instance, if he'd remained quiet about Canada until after our election then we'd be in a very different situation now.) Trump's just an idiot, plain and simple, and the people he surrounds himself with are either idiots themselves or too cowardly to call the idiots out on their idiocy.

It's a mistake to think that either he or his handlers have some kind of master plan and that everything Trump does is the result of expert manoeuvring that just looks like stupidity. That promotes defeatism and gets people to surrender prematurely. As long as people stand up to Trump, he will lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

You mean that this plan was not fully thought out and is just another reactionary policy that will do more harm than good? Shocking!

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So how come the people in MANUFACTURING couldn't see his proposal in MANUFACTURING was a big crock of shit?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Because the people writing him checks aren't the people doing all the actual work.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there

This is what everyone has been saying ad-nauseum since this whole shit show started.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

BRB, setting up my backyard forge after years of not smooshing any metal. Looks like it's up to people like me to make all this complicated tool&die

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

But they'll be able to build big beautiful factories with huge tarriffs on all the building supplies and equipment right?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›