this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
171 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23406 readers
2911 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If "migrants" have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don't really have the ability to either.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

If "migrants" have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don't really have the ability to either.

"Oh he'd never do that to real Americans..."

Meanwhile, the leopards are waiting.

The leopards yearn for the faces.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago

Consider?

Pretty sure they've been doing that from the start.

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt this administration is going to stop pushing it's lawlessness unless there is push back with consequences. Throw Stephen Miller into a CIA black site and watch how fast this crazy shit stops.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago

Stephen Miller? The migrant? Yeah, sounds good. I heard he crossed the Darien Gap by eating five toddlers as rations.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

*Trying to suspend

The headline is not doing constitutional democracy and the rule of law any favors by making casual readers think they have that power, which (sorry to be all technical, NYT) they do not have.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

(sorry to be all technical, NYT)

No reason to apologize. The NYT routinely do it on purpose, especially when it comes to cops and Israel.